Awareness and Attitudes Regarding Adverse Drug Events and Reporting in South Africa.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL INFORMATICS
Nokukhanya Ncube, Martha S Lubbe, Hanlie Steyn, Nkengafac V Motaze
{"title":"Awareness and Attitudes Regarding Adverse Drug Events and Reporting in South Africa.","authors":"Nokukhanya Ncube, Martha S Lubbe, Hanlie Steyn, Nkengafac V Motaze","doi":"10.1007/s43441-025-00795-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reporting of adverse drug events (ADEs), by consumers enhances medication-related risk surveillance, public awareness, and understanding of medicine safety. The aim of this study was to explore adults' awareness of ADEs, attitudes towards reporting and perceptions of their role in reporting ADEs in South Africa.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional, analytical study in which adults residing in South Africa completed an online questionnaire. The data collected was analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We received responses from 350 participants. Most participants (86.2%, n = 302; N = 350) reported having heard about ADEs and the majority of participants (94.4%, n = 301; N = 319) indicated that reporting of ADEs was important. The Med Safety App was not widely known (17.3%, n = 58; N = 336) while the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) was relatively well known (77.4%, n = 260; N = 336). Healthcare providers only educated 55.7% (n = 180; N = 323) of the participants about ADEs and only 50.5% (n = 163; N = 323) of the participants asked their healthcare providers about ADEs. Awareness regarding ADEs was significantly higher (p < 0.001) among healthcare professionals (HCPs) compared to non-healthcare professionals (non-HCP).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Most participants were aware of ADEs and agreed it was important to report ADEs although reporting tools, such as the Med Safety App, were not well known. We recommend awareness campaigns on reporting processes because this could improve consumer reporting of ADEs in South Africa.</p>","PeriodicalId":23084,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43441-025-00795-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reporting of adverse drug events (ADEs), by consumers enhances medication-related risk surveillance, public awareness, and understanding of medicine safety. The aim of this study was to explore adults' awareness of ADEs, attitudes towards reporting and perceptions of their role in reporting ADEs in South Africa.

Method: We conducted a cross-sectional, analytical study in which adults residing in South Africa completed an online questionnaire. The data collected was analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: We received responses from 350 participants. Most participants (86.2%, n = 302; N = 350) reported having heard about ADEs and the majority of participants (94.4%, n = 301; N = 319) indicated that reporting of ADEs was important. The Med Safety App was not widely known (17.3%, n = 58; N = 336) while the South African Health Products Regulatory Authority (SAHPRA) was relatively well known (77.4%, n = 260; N = 336). Healthcare providers only educated 55.7% (n = 180; N = 323) of the participants about ADEs and only 50.5% (n = 163; N = 323) of the participants asked their healthcare providers about ADEs. Awareness regarding ADEs was significantly higher (p < 0.001) among healthcare professionals (HCPs) compared to non-healthcare professionals (non-HCP).

Conclusion: Most participants were aware of ADEs and agreed it was important to report ADEs although reporting tools, such as the Med Safety App, were not well known. We recommend awareness campaigns on reporting processes because this could improve consumer reporting of ADEs in South Africa.

南非对药物不良事件和报告的认识和态度。
背景:消费者报告药物不良事件(ADEs)可以加强与药物相关的风险监测、公众意识和对药物安全的理解。本研究的目的是探讨南非成年人对不良事件的认识、对报告的态度以及他们在报告不良事件中所起作用的看法。方法:我们进行了一项横断面分析研究,其中居住在南非的成年人完成了一份在线问卷。收集的数据使用描述性和推断性统计进行分析。结果:我们收到了350名参与者的回复。大多数参与者(86.2%,n = 302;N = 350)报告听说过ade,大多数参与者(94.4%,N = 301;N = 319)表明ade的报告很重要。医疗安全App的知名度不高(17.3%,n = 58;N = 336),而南非保健品监管局(SAHPRA)相对知名(77.4%,N = 260;n = 336)。医疗保健提供者仅接受过55.7%的教育(n = 180;(N = 323),仅为50.5% (N = 163;N = 323)的参与者向他们的医疗服务提供者询问了ADEs。结论:大多数参与者意识到ade,并同意报告ade的重要性,尽管报告工具,如Med Safety App,尚不为人所知。我们建议开展关于报告程序的宣传活动,因为这可以改善南非消费者对ADEs的报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science
Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science MEDICAL INFORMATICS-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science (TIRS) is the official scientific journal of DIA that strives to advance medical product discovery, development, regulation, and use through the publication of peer-reviewed original and review articles, commentaries, and letters to the editor across the spectrum of converting biomedical science into practical solutions to advance human health. The focus areas of the journal are as follows: Biostatistics Clinical Trials Product Development and Innovation Global Perspectives Policy Regulatory Science Product Safety Special Populations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信