Development and validation of the telemedicine facilitators scale: A novel measure of telemedicine facilitators and use.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jack D Watson, Alexandra L Silverman, Bridget Xia, Rea Pillai, Rajesh Balkrishnan, Bradford S Pierce, Paul B Perrin
{"title":"Development and validation of the telemedicine facilitators scale: A novel measure of telemedicine facilitators and use.","authors":"Jack D Watson, Alexandra L Silverman, Bridget Xia, Rea Pillai, Rajesh Balkrishnan, Bradford S Pierce, Paul B Perrin","doi":"10.1177/1357633X251333534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of telemedicine, with heightened rates of use persisting postpandemic. This change in use created a need for a valid and reliable scale to assess telemedicine use and facilitators impacting its uptake. The current study developed and validated the Telemedicine Facilitators Scale (TFS), a novel measure for assessing facilitators of telemedicine uptake. A sample of 228 physicians completed 13 items for the TFS along with an index of telemedicine use for convergent validity. We conducted two confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models testing a four-factor structure (Positive Attitudes, Facilitating Infrastructure, Organizational Support, and External Policies) and a bifactor model in which all items loaded onto to a single telemedicine facilitators factor and the previous four factors. Both the four-factor CFA and bifactor models demonstrated acceptable fit for χ<sup>2</sup>/degrees of freedom, comparative fit index, and incremental fit index. The correlations among subscales showed that each subscale, while related, measured independent constructs. Both the general telemedicine facilitators factor and all four subfactors were positively correlated with telemedicine use, evidencing good convergent validity. Results suggest that the TFS may be used as a four-factor scale, a unidimensional scale, or a scale composed of both an overarching construct and four subconstructs. The TFS represents a useful tool for researchers, clinicians, and healthcare administrators who wish to study, use, or facilitate the use and evolution of telemedicine.</p>","PeriodicalId":50024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","volume":" ","pages":"1357633X251333534"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X251333534","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a dramatic increase in the use of telemedicine, with heightened rates of use persisting postpandemic. This change in use created a need for a valid and reliable scale to assess telemedicine use and facilitators impacting its uptake. The current study developed and validated the Telemedicine Facilitators Scale (TFS), a novel measure for assessing facilitators of telemedicine uptake. A sample of 228 physicians completed 13 items for the TFS along with an index of telemedicine use for convergent validity. We conducted two confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) models testing a four-factor structure (Positive Attitudes, Facilitating Infrastructure, Organizational Support, and External Policies) and a bifactor model in which all items loaded onto to a single telemedicine facilitators factor and the previous four factors. Both the four-factor CFA and bifactor models demonstrated acceptable fit for χ2/degrees of freedom, comparative fit index, and incremental fit index. The correlations among subscales showed that each subscale, while related, measured independent constructs. Both the general telemedicine facilitators factor and all four subfactors were positively correlated with telemedicine use, evidencing good convergent validity. Results suggest that the TFS may be used as a four-factor scale, a unidimensional scale, or a scale composed of both an overarching construct and four subconstructs. The TFS represents a useful tool for researchers, clinicians, and healthcare administrators who wish to study, use, or facilitate the use and evolution of telemedicine.

远程医疗助理员量表的开发与验证:一种新的远程医疗助理员及其使用的测量方法。
2019冠状病毒病大流行导致远程医疗的使用急剧增加,大流行后使用率持续上升。这种使用上的变化需要一个有效和可靠的量表来评估远程医疗的使用和影响其吸收的促进因素。本研究开发并验证了远程医疗促进者量表(TFS),这是一种评估远程医疗促进者吸收的新方法。以228名医生为样本,完成了13个项目的远程医疗使用量表及会聚效度指标。我们进行了两个验证性因子分析(CFA)模型,测试了一个四因素结构(积极态度、促进基础设施、组织支持和外部政策)和一个双因素模型,其中所有项目加载到单个远程医疗促进因素和前四个因素上。四因素CFA和双因素模型的χ2/自由度、比较拟合指数和增量拟合指数均表现出可接受的拟合。子量表之间的相关性表明,每个子量表虽然相关,但测量的是独立的构念。远程医疗一般辅助因素和四个子因素均与远程医疗使用呈正相关,具有良好的收敛效度。结果表明,TFS可以作为四因子量表、一维量表或由一个总构念和四个子构念组成的量表。对于希望研究、使用或促进远程医疗的使用和发展的研究人员、临床医生和医疗保健管理人员来说,TFS是一个有用的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
10.60%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare provides excellent peer reviewed coverage of developments in telemedicine and e-health and is now widely recognised as the leading journal in its field. Contributions from around the world provide a unique perspective on how different countries and health systems are using new technology in health care. Sections within the journal include technology updates, editorials, original articles, research tutorials, educational material, review articles and reports from various telemedicine organisations. A subscription to this journal will help you to stay up-to-date in this fast moving and growing area of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信