Parents' Perceptions of Claims on Packaged Commercial Toddler Foods: A Qualitative Study

Abstract

Commercial toddler foods (CTFs) are widely used. Many are nutritionally poor despite displaying health, nutrition or marketing claims implying healthiness. This study aimed to: (i) explore how claims on CTFs influence parents' product perceptions and preferences, and gauge support for regulatory reform to ensure CTFs are marketed responsibly; (ii) identify other factors influencing parent's and toddlers' perceptions and preferences towards CTFs and toddler feeding in general.

Six moderator-led online focus groups (N = 47) were conducted with parents of toddlers (aged 12 to < 36 months) in Victoria, Australia, using a discussion guide and mock CTFs to elicit discourse. Discussions were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analysed using exploratory content and thematic analysis.

Parents found CTFs displaying claims more appealing, despite awareness and scepticism of claims. Parents expressed frustration over industry's use of claims and supported stronger regulation of claims. Some doubted the effectiveness of regulations, concerned that industry would find ways to circumvent rules. Parents perceive visual features (especially cartoon characters) on CTFs as highly influential for toddlers. Parents support honest labelling of CTFs, reflecting a product's actual ingredients and nutritional profile, especially signposting of sugar content. Parents evaluate CTFs based on perceived healthiness and convenience, often relying on social media and brand reputation for guidance on what to feed their toddlers.

While parents are aware of, and sceptical about claims on CTFs, these claims still influence their perceptions. Findings highlight the need for stronger regulations to ensure that claims on CTFs do not create inaccurate perceptions of their healthiness.