Reflexive moralization: The crucial role of clinician moral well-being.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Clare Whitney
{"title":"Reflexive moralization: The crucial role of clinician moral well-being.","authors":"Clare Whitney","doi":"10.1177/09697330251339057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMoralization, or the application of moral value onto individuals' actions or identities, has broad impact in the context of health and healthcare. In particular, moralization may result in interpersonal and institutional consequences for certain groups of individuals such as people who use substances during pregnancy or while feeding human milk. Reflexive moralization is an underexplored phenomenon that represents the reflex-like nature of some instances of moralization. <b>Objectives:</b> The purpose of this study was to explore and explain how reflexive moralization impacts the perinatal care of substance-exposed dyads.Research DesignIn this targeted sub-analysis, dimensional analysis was used in the mode of emergent fit to analyze qualitative interviews conducted for a parent study investigating the circumstances under which clinicians bring moral considerations into the care of substance-exposed dyads.Participants and Research ContextInterviews with fifteen perinatal health clinician providing health or social care to substance-exposed dyads were included in this analysis.Ethical ConsiderationsThe X IRB determined this study exempt. All participants provided informed consent prior to enrolling in the study.ResultsFindings revealed novel dimensions of reflexive moralization, including the process of sympathization, which occurs when clinicians demoralize and transform their reflexive moralization into a tool for care. In order for the transformative process of sympathization to occur, clinician moral well-being must be assessed as sufficient, meaning clinicians must feel they have the capacity and competence to provide adequate care to patients. <b>Discussion:</b> Future research should further investigate the nature of clinician moral well-being in order to measure and develop interventions to support it.ConclusionsClinician moral well-being plays a pivotal role in clinical care delivery for substance-exposed dyads, in the context of reflexive moralization.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251339057"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251339057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundMoralization, or the application of moral value onto individuals' actions or identities, has broad impact in the context of health and healthcare. In particular, moralization may result in interpersonal and institutional consequences for certain groups of individuals such as people who use substances during pregnancy or while feeding human milk. Reflexive moralization is an underexplored phenomenon that represents the reflex-like nature of some instances of moralization. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to explore and explain how reflexive moralization impacts the perinatal care of substance-exposed dyads.Research DesignIn this targeted sub-analysis, dimensional analysis was used in the mode of emergent fit to analyze qualitative interviews conducted for a parent study investigating the circumstances under which clinicians bring moral considerations into the care of substance-exposed dyads.Participants and Research ContextInterviews with fifteen perinatal health clinician providing health or social care to substance-exposed dyads were included in this analysis.Ethical ConsiderationsThe X IRB determined this study exempt. All participants provided informed consent prior to enrolling in the study.ResultsFindings revealed novel dimensions of reflexive moralization, including the process of sympathization, which occurs when clinicians demoralize and transform their reflexive moralization into a tool for care. In order for the transformative process of sympathization to occur, clinician moral well-being must be assessed as sufficient, meaning clinicians must feel they have the capacity and competence to provide adequate care to patients. Discussion: Future research should further investigate the nature of clinician moral well-being in order to measure and develop interventions to support it.ConclusionsClinician moral well-being plays a pivotal role in clinical care delivery for substance-exposed dyads, in the context of reflexive moralization.

反身性道德化:临床医生道德福祉的关键作用。
道德化,或道德价值对个人行为或身份的应用,在健康和医疗保健的背景下具有广泛的影响。特别是,教化可能对某些群体的个人造成人际关系和制度上的后果,例如在怀孕期间或喂奶时使用药物的人。反身性道德化是一种未被充分探索的现象,它代表了某些道德化实例的反射性本质。目的:本研究的目的是探讨和解释反身性道德教育如何影响物质暴露双子体的围产期护理。研究设计在这一针对性的子分析中,维度分析采用紧急拟合模式来分析为一项父母研究进行的定性访谈,该研究调查了临床医生在护理物质暴露的二联体时考虑道德因素的情况。参与者和研究背景本分析包括对15名为物质暴露的二联体提供健康或社会护理的围产期保健临床医生的访谈。伦理考虑X审查委员会决定本研究豁免。所有参与者在参加研究前都提供了知情同意。结果研究结果揭示了反身性道德化的新维度,包括同情过程,当临床医生士气低落并将他们的反身性道德化转化为护理工具时,同情过程就会发生。为了使同情的转变过程发生,临床医生的道德福祉必须被评估为足够的,这意味着临床医生必须感到他们有能力和能力为病人提供足够的护理。讨论:未来的研究应进一步调查临床医生道德福祉的本质,以衡量和发展干预措施来支持它。结论在反身性道德化背景下,临床医生道德幸福感在物质暴露双联体的临床护理服务中起着关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信