Ethical and equity challenges in employment: Perspectives of international nursing graduates.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Animesh Ghimire, Yunjing Qiu
{"title":"Ethical and equity challenges in employment: Perspectives of international nursing graduates.","authors":"Animesh Ghimire, Yunjing Qiu","doi":"10.1177/09697330251333397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAustralia faces a critical shortage of nurses, yet international nursing graduates (INGs) encounter significant barriers to securing employment after graduation. Current policies often prioritize domestic graduates, creating systemic disadvantages for INGs, particularly those on temporary visas. This inequity raises ethical concerns and undermines Australia's ability to fully utilize its nursing workforce, potentially compromising the quality of healthcare services.AimThis study explores the lived experiences of INGs regarding employment challenges in Australia, critically examining the ethical and equity implications of existing practices.Research Design A qualitative study employing a combined phenomenological and exploratory approach was conducted. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis framework.Participants and Research ContextTwelve international nursing students in their final semester of the Bachelor of Nursing program at two metropolitan universities in Australia participated in semi-structured interviews.Ethical ConsiderationsEthical approval was obtained from the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (MUHREC-44400) and the University of Technology Sydney (ETH24-10028). Informed consent was obtained from all participants, who were assured of their right to confidentiality and to withdraw from the study at any time.ResultsFive overarching themes emerged: (1) Economic Disparity and Ethical Considerations, (2) Systemic Discrimination and Inequality, (3) Mental Health and Well-being, (4) Policy and Regulatory Barriers, and (5) Lack of Cultural Inclusion and a Sense of (Un)Belongingness.ConclusionsThe findings highlight urgent ethical concerns and equity challenges that demand comprehensive reforms to create a more inclusive and ethically sound environment for INGs in Australia. These reforms necessitate policy changes to address discriminatory practices and visa restrictions, enhanced institutional support to facilitate INGs' transition into the workforce, and a commitment to cultural competence and inclusion at all levels of the healthcare system. Addressing these systemic barriers is not only a matter of fairness and justice but is also crucial for ensuring a robust and ethically sustainable healthcare workforce in Australia.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"9697330251333397"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330251333397","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundAustralia faces a critical shortage of nurses, yet international nursing graduates (INGs) encounter significant barriers to securing employment after graduation. Current policies often prioritize domestic graduates, creating systemic disadvantages for INGs, particularly those on temporary visas. This inequity raises ethical concerns and undermines Australia's ability to fully utilize its nursing workforce, potentially compromising the quality of healthcare services.AimThis study explores the lived experiences of INGs regarding employment challenges in Australia, critically examining the ethical and equity implications of existing practices.Research Design A qualitative study employing a combined phenomenological and exploratory approach was conducted. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis framework.Participants and Research ContextTwelve international nursing students in their final semester of the Bachelor of Nursing program at two metropolitan universities in Australia participated in semi-structured interviews.Ethical ConsiderationsEthical approval was obtained from the Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (MUHREC-44400) and the University of Technology Sydney (ETH24-10028). Informed consent was obtained from all participants, who were assured of their right to confidentiality and to withdraw from the study at any time.ResultsFive overarching themes emerged: (1) Economic Disparity and Ethical Considerations, (2) Systemic Discrimination and Inequality, (3) Mental Health and Well-being, (4) Policy and Regulatory Barriers, and (5) Lack of Cultural Inclusion and a Sense of (Un)Belongingness.ConclusionsThe findings highlight urgent ethical concerns and equity challenges that demand comprehensive reforms to create a more inclusive and ethically sound environment for INGs in Australia. These reforms necessitate policy changes to address discriminatory practices and visa restrictions, enhanced institutional support to facilitate INGs' transition into the workforce, and a commitment to cultural competence and inclusion at all levels of the healthcare system. Addressing these systemic barriers is not only a matter of fairness and justice but is also crucial for ensuring a robust and ethically sustainable healthcare workforce in Australia.

就业中的道德和公平挑战:国际护理毕业生的视角。
澳大利亚面临着护士的严重短缺,然而国际护理毕业生(INGs)在毕业后找到工作时遇到了很大的障碍。目前的政策往往优先考虑国内毕业生,这给外国留学生,尤其是那些持有临时签证的人,造成了系统性的劣势。这种不平等引起了道德问题,并破坏了澳大利亚充分利用其护理人员的能力,潜在地损害了医疗保健服务的质量。目的本研究探讨了在澳大利亚就业挑战的生活经验,批判性地检查了现有实践的道德和公平影响。研究设计采用现象学和探索性相结合的方法进行定性研究。使用专题分析框架对数据进行分析。研究对象和研究背景12名在澳大利亚两所城市大学攻读护理学士学位的国际护理学生参加了半结构化访谈。伦理考虑获得莫纳什大学人类研究伦理委员会(muhrecc -44400)和悉尼科技大学(ETH24-10028)的伦理批准。获得了所有参与者的知情同意,并保证他们的保密权利和随时退出研究的权利。结果五大主题:(1)经济差距和伦理考量;(2)系统性歧视和不平等;(3)心理健康和福祉;(4)政策和监管障碍;(5)文化包容和归属感缺失。研究结果强调了迫切的道德问题和公平挑战,需要进行全面改革,为澳大利亚的互联网企业创造一个更具包容性和道德健全的环境。这些改革需要改变政策以解决歧视性做法和签证限制,加强制度支持以促进移民向劳动力过渡,并致力于在各级医疗保健系统中实现文化竞争力和包容性。解决这些系统性障碍不仅是公平和正义的问题,而且对于确保澳大利亚强大和道德可持续的医疗保健队伍也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信