Standardization of Clinician Outcomes for Croup Using a Clinical Pathway.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Pediatric emergency care Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000003385
Yongtian T Tan, Emily A Hartford, Dwight Barry, Lori E Rutman, Russell T Migita
{"title":"Standardization of Clinician Outcomes for Croup Using a Clinical Pathway.","authors":"Yongtian T Tan, Emily A Hartford, Dwight Barry, Lori E Rutman, Russell T Migita","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Croup management varies significantly between hospitals and clinicians. We assessed the level of clinician variation with a clinical croup pathway in the pediatric emergency department (PED) and the impact of a pathway change on admission rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of children with croup in a PED at an academic referral hospital between 2018 and 2022. Primary outcome measures were the proportion of admissions to the hospital and mean PED length of stay. The main exposures were the primary clinician and their use of racemic epinephrine. We used generalized linear mixed models to evaluate interclinician variability in outcome measures and outcomes by self-identified race, ethnicity, and language.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no variability in the use of racemic epinephrine, odds of admission, or odds of unplanned PED returns among 59 clinicians; there was variability in length of stay with a difference of ten minutes. Black patients had 87% higher odds of being admitted (Odds Ratio: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.04, 3.38), and patients identifying as \"other\" racial group had 94% higher odds of unplanned PED returns (Odds Ratio: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.53). Quarterly admit rates decreased from 7.8% to 5.1% after pathway change, with no statistical change in unplanned PED returns or intensive care unit transfers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the presence of a clinical croup pathway, there was minimal clinician variation in care. There were differences by patient race in admissions and PED return visits, but no differences by language for care. With a change in the pathway, admissions were reduced without a change in balancing measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":"554-559"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003385","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Croup management varies significantly between hospitals and clinicians. We assessed the level of clinician variation with a clinical croup pathway in the pediatric emergency department (PED) and the impact of a pathway change on admission rates.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of children with croup in a PED at an academic referral hospital between 2018 and 2022. Primary outcome measures were the proportion of admissions to the hospital and mean PED length of stay. The main exposures were the primary clinician and their use of racemic epinephrine. We used generalized linear mixed models to evaluate interclinician variability in outcome measures and outcomes by self-identified race, ethnicity, and language.

Results: There was no variability in the use of racemic epinephrine, odds of admission, or odds of unplanned PED returns among 59 clinicians; there was variability in length of stay with a difference of ten minutes. Black patients had 87% higher odds of being admitted (Odds Ratio: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.04, 3.38), and patients identifying as "other" racial group had 94% higher odds of unplanned PED returns (Odds Ratio: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.21, 1.53). Quarterly admit rates decreased from 7.8% to 5.1% after pathway change, with no statistical change in unplanned PED returns or intensive care unit transfers.

Conclusions: In the presence of a clinical croup pathway, there was minimal clinician variation in care. There were differences by patient race in admissions and PED return visits, but no differences by language for care. With a change in the pathway, admissions were reduced without a change in balancing measures.

使用临床路径的组临床结果标准化。
目的:分组管理在医院和临床医生之间存在显著差异。我们评估了儿科急诊科(PED)临床分组路径的临床医生差异水平,以及路径改变对入院率的影响。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象是2018年至2022年在一家学术转诊医院的PED患儿。主要结局指标为住院率和平均PED住院时间。主要暴露于初级临床医生及其外消旋肾上腺素的使用。我们使用广义线性混合模型来评估结果测量的临床间可变性,以及自我认同的种族、民族和语言的结果。结果:在59名临床医生中,外消旋肾上腺素的使用、入院的几率或意外PED复发的几率没有变化;停留时间长短存在差异,差异为10分钟。黑人患者入院的几率高出87%(优势比:1.87;95% CI: 1.04, 3.38),被认定为“其他”种族的患者出现计划外PED复发的几率高出94%(优势比:1.94,95% CI: 1.21, 1.53)。在路径改变后,季度入院率从7.8%下降到5.1%,计划外的PED返回或重症监护病房转移没有统计学变化。结论:在存在临床组途径的情况下,临床医生在护理方面的差异很小。患者种族在入院和PED回访方面存在差异,但在护理语言方面没有差异。随着途径的改变,在不改变平衡措施的情况下,入学人数减少了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信