Development and psychometric evaluation of the Japanese version of the Nurse Professional Competence Scale Short-Form.

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING
Belitung Nursing Journal Pub Date : 2025-04-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.33546/bnj.3726
Sachiko Tanabe, Mika Tanaka, Yoko Arai, Kanae Matsuo, Sigrid Nakrem, Ann Gardulf
{"title":"Development and psychometric evaluation of the Japanese version of the Nurse Professional Competence Scale Short-Form.","authors":"Sachiko Tanabe, Mika Tanaka, Yoko Arai, Kanae Matsuo, Sigrid Nakrem, Ann Gardulf","doi":"10.33546/bnj.3726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To develop high-quality human resources with the competence required for nursing, contents of undergraduate education programs must be reviewed and enhanced. Assessments of competence levels at the time of graduation can be used to evaluate nursing education programs. International comparisons using a common assessment instrument can help identify and endorse common features, as well as highlight areas that need reform in nursing education programs from a wide range of perspectives.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop the Japanese version of the Nurse Professional Competence Scale Short-Form and assess its psychometric properties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a descriptive cross-sectional design to validate an instrument, conducted at eight university schools of nursing in mainland Japan. A total of 714 graduating nursing students were invited and informed about the study in mid-February 2022, with 299 students (41.88%) responding to all questions and submitting their answers via online survey forms. After item analysis, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. Concurrent validity and internal consistency were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondent ages ranged from 21 to 51 years, with an average age of 22.4 ±1.97 years. Most of the respondents were female (97.99%). The mean score for the scale was 55.70 (±9.98), and the scores for the six competence areas ranged from 48.04 (±14.07) to 64.73 (±10.67). Item analysis revealed that all items met each criterion, except for Pearson's correlation coefficients for Items 34 and 35. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the CMIN/df value was 2.46, and the root mean square error of approximation value was 0.07. Concurrent validity analysis showed significant moderate correlations (<i>r</i> = 0.45 and 0.49, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The Cronbach's α values for the scale and six competence areas ranged from 0.75 to 0.95.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Nurse Professional Competence Scale Short-Form Japanese version, comprising 35 items across six competence areas, demonstrated reasonably acceptable validity and reliability for use with graduating nursing students in Japan. The highest- and lowest-scoring competence areas were Value-Based Nursing Care and Medical Technical Care, respectively.</p>","PeriodicalId":42002,"journal":{"name":"Belitung Nursing Journal","volume":"11 2","pages":"252-260"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12006805/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Belitung Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33546/bnj.3726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: To develop high-quality human resources with the competence required for nursing, contents of undergraduate education programs must be reviewed and enhanced. Assessments of competence levels at the time of graduation can be used to evaluate nursing education programs. International comparisons using a common assessment instrument can help identify and endorse common features, as well as highlight areas that need reform in nursing education programs from a wide range of perspectives.

Objective: To develop the Japanese version of the Nurse Professional Competence Scale Short-Form and assess its psychometric properties.

Methods: This study used a descriptive cross-sectional design to validate an instrument, conducted at eight university schools of nursing in mainland Japan. A total of 714 graduating nursing students were invited and informed about the study in mid-February 2022, with 299 students (41.88%) responding to all questions and submitting their answers via online survey forms. After item analysis, confirmatory factor analysis was conducted. Concurrent validity and internal consistency were also assessed.

Results: Respondent ages ranged from 21 to 51 years, with an average age of 22.4 ±1.97 years. Most of the respondents were female (97.99%). The mean score for the scale was 55.70 (±9.98), and the scores for the six competence areas ranged from 48.04 (±14.07) to 64.73 (±10.67). Item analysis revealed that all items met each criterion, except for Pearson's correlation coefficients for Items 34 and 35. Confirmatory factor analysis showed the CMIN/df value was 2.46, and the root mean square error of approximation value was 0.07. Concurrent validity analysis showed significant moderate correlations (r = 0.45 and 0.49, p < 0.001). The Cronbach's α values for the scale and six competence areas ranged from 0.75 to 0.95.

Conclusions: The Nurse Professional Competence Scale Short-Form Japanese version, comprising 35 items across six competence areas, demonstrated reasonably acceptable validity and reliability for use with graduating nursing students in Japan. The highest- and lowest-scoring competence areas were Value-Based Nursing Care and Medical Technical Care, respectively.

日文版护士职业能力量表简表的编制及心理测量学评价。
背景:为培养具有护理能力的高素质人力资源,必须对本科教育内容进行反思和改进。毕业时的能力水平评估可用于评估护理教育项目。使用共同的评估工具进行国际比较可以帮助识别和认可共同的特征,并从广泛的角度突出护理教育计划需要改革的领域。目的:编制日文版护士职业能力量表简表,并对其心理测量特性进行评价。方法:本研究采用描述性横断面设计来验证一种工具,在日本大陆的八所大学护理学院进行。在2022年2月中旬,共有714名即将毕业的护理专业学生被邀请并了解了这项研究,299名学生(41.88%)通过在线调查表格回答了所有问题并提交了答案。项目分析后,进行验证性因子分析。同时评估了并发效度和内部一致性。结果:受访者年龄21 ~ 51岁,平均年龄22.4±1.97岁。受访者中以女性居多(97.99%)。量表平均得分为55.70(±9.98)分,6个能力领域得分范围为48.04(±14.07)~ 64.73(±10.67)分。项目分析显示,除了项目34和35的Pearson相关系数外,所有项目都符合每个标准。验证性因子分析显示CMIN/df值为2.46,逼近值的均方根误差为0.07。并发效度分析显示显著的中度相关(r = 0.45和0.49,p < 0.001)。量表和六个能力域的Cronbach’s α值为0.75 ~ 0.95。结论:日文版护士专业能力量表包含6个能力领域的35个项目,在日本护理专业毕业生中具有合理的效度和信度。得分最高和最低的能力领域分别是基于价值的护理和医疗技术护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
42.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信