Visualizing functional network connectivity differences using an explainable machine-learning method.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Mohammad S E Sendi, Vaibhavi S Itkyal, Sabrina J Edwards-Swart, Ji Ye Chun, Daniel H Mathalon, Judith M Ford, Adrian Preda, Theo G M van Erp, Godfrey D Pearlson, Jessica A Turner, Vince D Calhoun
{"title":"Visualizing functional network connectivity differences using an explainable machine-learning method.","authors":"Mohammad S E Sendi, Vaibhavi S Itkyal, Sabrina J Edwards-Swart, Ji Ye Chun, Daniel H Mathalon, Judith M Ford, Adrian Preda, Theo G M van Erp, Godfrey D Pearlson, Jessica A Turner, Vince D Calhoun","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/adce52","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Functional network connectivity (FNC) estimated from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging showed great information about the neural mechanism in different brain disorders. But previous research has mainly focused on standard statistical learning approaches to find FNC features separating patients from control. While machine learning models can improve classification accuracy, they often lack interpretability, making it difficult to understand how they arrive at their decisions.<i>Approach</i>. Explainable machine learning helps address this issue by identifying which features contribute most to the model's predictions. In this study, we introduce a novel framework leveraging SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAPs) to identify crucial FNC features distinguishing between two distinct population classes.<i>Main results</i>. Initially, we validate our approach using synthetic data. Subsequently, applying our framework, we ascertain FNC biomarkers distinguishing between, controls and schizophrenia (SZ) patients with accuracy of 81.04% as well as middle aged adults and old aged adults with accuracy 71.38%, respectively, employing random forest, XGBoost, and CATBoost models.<i>Significance</i>. Our analysis underscores the pivotal role of the cognitive control network (CCN), subcortical network (SCN), and somatomotor network in discerning individuals with SZ from controls. In addition, our platform found CCN and SCN as the most important networks separating young adults from older.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":"46 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/adce52","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. Functional network connectivity (FNC) estimated from resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging showed great information about the neural mechanism in different brain disorders. But previous research has mainly focused on standard statistical learning approaches to find FNC features separating patients from control. While machine learning models can improve classification accuracy, they often lack interpretability, making it difficult to understand how they arrive at their decisions.Approach. Explainable machine learning helps address this issue by identifying which features contribute most to the model's predictions. In this study, we introduce a novel framework leveraging SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAPs) to identify crucial FNC features distinguishing between two distinct population classes.Main results. Initially, we validate our approach using synthetic data. Subsequently, applying our framework, we ascertain FNC biomarkers distinguishing between, controls and schizophrenia (SZ) patients with accuracy of 81.04% as well as middle aged adults and old aged adults with accuracy 71.38%, respectively, employing random forest, XGBoost, and CATBoost models.Significance. Our analysis underscores the pivotal role of the cognitive control network (CCN), subcortical network (SCN), and somatomotor network in discerning individuals with SZ from controls. In addition, our platform found CCN and SCN as the most important networks separating young adults from older.

使用可解释的机器学习方法可视化功能网络连接差异。
目标。静息状态功能磁共振成像估计的功能网络连通性(FNC)对不同脑疾病的神经机制提供了重要信息。但之前的研究主要集中在标准的统计学习方法上,以找到区分患者和对照组的FNC特征。虽然机器学习模型可以提高分类的准确性,但它们往往缺乏可解释性,这使得人们很难理解它们是如何做出决定的。可解释的机器学习通过识别哪些特征对模型的预测贡献最大,帮助解决了这个问题。在这项研究中,我们引入了一个新的框架,利用SHapley加性解释(SHAPs)来识别区分两个不同种群类别的关键FNC特征。主要的结果。最初,我们使用合成数据验证我们的方法。随后,应用我们的框架,我们采用随机森林、XGBoost和CATBoost模型,分别确定了区分精神分裂症(SZ)患者和对照组的FNC生物标志物,准确率为81.04%,中年人和老年人的FNC生物标志物准确率为71.38%。我们的分析强调了认知控制网络(CCN)、皮质下网络(SCN)和躯体运动网络在区分SZ个体和对照组中的关键作用。此外,我们的平台发现CCN和SCN是区分年轻人和老年人的最重要的网络。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信