Isabel A Snee, Kishan S Shah, Luke J Llaurado, Laura K Tom
{"title":"Unmasking Inequality: The Current State of Health Disparities Research in Plastic Surgery.","authors":"Isabel A Snee, Kishan S Shah, Luke J Llaurado, Laura K Tom","doi":"10.1097/PRS.0000000000012198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Health disparities persist within plastic and reconstructive surgery, disproportionately impacting patient populations based on social determinants of health. These disparities contribute to delayed treatment, higher complication rates, and worse aesthetic and functional outcomes, ultimately affecting quality of life and patient well-being. While progress has been made in identifying these inequities, there remains a need for targeted research to design, implement, and assess interventions that directly address these disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review of recent PRS literature to evaluate the proportion of studies focused on identifying, understanding, and addressing disparities. Using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search identified national studies published since 2019 that addressed healthcare disparities specific to PRS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 173 studies included, 81.5% focused on identifying disparities, while only 10.4% aimed to understand causative factors, and an additional 8.10% implemented interventions to reduce disparities. Disparities were most reported in breast surgery, followed by general reconstruction and non-breast microsurgery, with minority racial groups, lower socioeconomic status, and women experiencing the greatest burden of inequity. Most studies evaluated barriers such as treatment access, offers of care, and post-surgical complications, yet few studies progressed to implementing solutions that address these challenges.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To achieve meaningful progress, PRS disparities research must move beyond identifying inequities to actively reducing them through evidence-based interventions, policy initiatives, and patient-centered care. Addressing these inequities can improve access to treatment, surgical outcomes, and quality of life for underserved populations. By prioritizing actionable solutions, the field of PRS can achieve more equitable healthcare delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":20128,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and reconstructive surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000012198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Health disparities persist within plastic and reconstructive surgery, disproportionately impacting patient populations based on social determinants of health. These disparities contribute to delayed treatment, higher complication rates, and worse aesthetic and functional outcomes, ultimately affecting quality of life and patient well-being. While progress has been made in identifying these inequities, there remains a need for targeted research to design, implement, and assess interventions that directly address these disparities.
Methods: We conducted a scoping review of recent PRS literature to evaluate the proportion of studies focused on identifying, understanding, and addressing disparities. Using the PRISMA-ScR guidelines, a systematic search identified national studies published since 2019 that addressed healthcare disparities specific to PRS.
Results: Of the 173 studies included, 81.5% focused on identifying disparities, while only 10.4% aimed to understand causative factors, and an additional 8.10% implemented interventions to reduce disparities. Disparities were most reported in breast surgery, followed by general reconstruction and non-breast microsurgery, with minority racial groups, lower socioeconomic status, and women experiencing the greatest burden of inequity. Most studies evaluated barriers such as treatment access, offers of care, and post-surgical complications, yet few studies progressed to implementing solutions that address these challenges.
Conclusion: To achieve meaningful progress, PRS disparities research must move beyond identifying inequities to actively reducing them through evidence-based interventions, policy initiatives, and patient-centered care. Addressing these inequities can improve access to treatment, surgical outcomes, and quality of life for underserved populations. By prioritizing actionable solutions, the field of PRS can achieve more equitable healthcare delivery.
期刊介绍:
For more than 70 years Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® has been the one consistently excellent reference for every specialist who uses plastic surgery techniques or works in conjunction with a plastic surgeon. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® , the official journal of the American Society of Plastic Surgeons, is a benefit of Society membership, and is also available on a subscription basis.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery® brings subscribers up-to-the-minute reports on the latest techniques and follow-up for all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including breast reconstruction, experimental studies, maxillofacial reconstruction, hand and microsurgery, burn repair, cosmetic surgery, as well as news on medicolegal issues. The cosmetic section provides expanded coverage on new procedures and techniques and offers more cosmetic-specific content than any other journal. All subscribers enjoy full access to the Journal''s website, which features broadcast quality videos of reconstructive and cosmetic procedures, podcasts, comprehensive article archives dating to 1946, and additional benefits offered by the newly-redesigned website.