The Relationship Between Personality Inventory for DSM (PID-5) Domains and Disruptive Behavior Disorders.

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Ömer Faruk Akça, Kiana Cano, Carla Sharp
{"title":"The Relationship Between Personality Inventory for DSM (PID-5) Domains and Disruptive Behavior Disorders.","authors":"Ömer Faruk Akça, Kiana Cano, Carla Sharp","doi":"10.2478/sjcapp-2025-0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Previous research has demonstrated a strong relationship between personality and psychopathology. However, the relationship between the traits listed in the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) and Disruptive Behavior Disorders (DBD) in adolescents has not been examined in detail. This study aimed to examine the relationship between the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) domains and DBD symptoms in an adolescent inpatient sample.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 127 adolescents (71% female) aged 12-17 years (M = 15.24, SD = 1.33) were recruited from an inpatient psychiatric hospital. These participants exhibited a wide range of psychiatric disorders unresponsive to prior interventions. They completed the PID-5-Short Form, the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children - Computerized Version (DISC-IV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism domains showed significant correlations with DBD scores. Hierarchical regression models predicting total DISC-IV and CBCL scores indicated that the addition of the PID-5 Antagonism and Disinhibition scales did not provide incremental predictive validity over total DBD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DBD symptoms are related to psychoticism, antagonism, and disinhibition. However, total Antagonism and Disinhibition scores did not contribute additional predictive power for overall psychopathology beyond DBD scores. These findings highlight questions about the discriminant validity of the PID-5 and suggest further research into the construct validity of these domains.</p>","PeriodicalId":42655,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"20250001"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12002568/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/sjcapp-2025-0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Previous research has demonstrated a strong relationship between personality and psychopathology. However, the relationship between the traits listed in the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders (AMPD) and Disruptive Behavior Disorders (DBD) in adolescents has not been examined in detail. This study aimed to examine the relationship between the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) domains and DBD symptoms in an adolescent inpatient sample.

Methods: A total of 127 adolescents (71% female) aged 12-17 years (M = 15.24, SD = 1.33) were recruited from an inpatient psychiatric hospital. These participants exhibited a wide range of psychiatric disorders unresponsive to prior interventions. They completed the PID-5-Short Form, the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), and the Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children - Computerized Version (DISC-IV).

Results: The antagonism, disinhibition, and psychoticism domains showed significant correlations with DBD scores. Hierarchical regression models predicting total DISC-IV and CBCL scores indicated that the addition of the PID-5 Antagonism and Disinhibition scales did not provide incremental predictive validity over total DBD symptoms.

Conclusion: DBD symptoms are related to psychoticism, antagonism, and disinhibition. However, total Antagonism and Disinhibition scores did not contribute additional predictive power for overall psychopathology beyond DBD scores. These findings highlight questions about the discriminant validity of the PID-5 and suggest further research into the construct validity of these domains.

DSM (PID-5)域人格量表与破坏性行为障碍的关系。
先前的研究已经证明了人格和精神病理之间的密切关系。然而,人格障碍替代模型(AMPD)中列出的特征与青少年破坏性行为障碍(DBD)之间的关系尚未得到详细的研究。本研究旨在探讨DSM-5 (PID-5)域人格量表与青少年住院患者DBD症状之间的关系。方法:选取某精神病院12 ~ 17岁青少年127例(71%为女性),M = 15.24, SD = 1.33。这些参与者表现出广泛的精神障碍,对先前的干预没有反应。他们完成了pid -5简短表格、儿童行为检查表(CBCL)和儿童诊断访谈表-计算机版(DISC-IV)。结果:拮抗性、去抑制性和精神病性域与DBD评分有显著相关。预测DISC-IV总分和CBCL总分的层次回归模型表明,添加PID-5拮抗和去抑制量表并没有提供对DBD总症状的增量预测效度。结论:DBD症状与精神病、拮抗和去抑制有关。然而,总的拮抗性和去抑制性评分对总体精神病理的预测能力并没有超出DBD评分。这些发现突出了关于PID-5的区分效度的问题,并建议进一步研究这些域的结构效度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
5.30%
发文量
12
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信