Claudia Juliette Jansen van Vuuren, Sharlini Sathananthan, Dina Hamalis, James Fenwick, Martin Patrick Griffiths, Ankur Thapar, Shiva Dindyal
{"title":"Leadership knowledge and behaviours: outcomes of a full-day leadership workshop focusing on personal growth in foundation doctors.","authors":"Claudia Juliette Jansen van Vuuren, Sharlini Sathananthan, Dina Hamalis, James Fenwick, Martin Patrick Griffiths, Ankur Thapar, Shiva Dindyal","doi":"10.1136/leader-2024-001062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Effective clinical leadership is required at every level, including in Foundation doctors. Most leadership programmes neglect self-awareness and personal growth aspects of leadership training. We modified the Basildon Leadership Hub to focus on these aspects and evaluated the new programme.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Large group sessions were led by speakers with varied leadership roles, interspersed by breakout sessions incorporating experiential and reflective learning. Attendees answered anonymous surveys before, immediately after, and 2 months after the workshop, with 5-point Likert-scale responses (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree) designed around reaction, knowledge and behaviour levels of evaluation. We assessed differences in median responses using the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni-Holm correction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The full-day workshop was attended by 27 trainees, 93% of whom considered it enjoyable and relevant. Attendees agreed more strongly to the statements 'I am a leader' and 'I know how I can demonstrate and develop my own leadership knowledge, skills and behaviours' in postcourse versus precourse surveys (p<0.001). The follow-up survey had a poor response rate of 26% with non-significant differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A full-day leadership workshop for Foundation doctors focusing on personal growth resulted in improvement in self-assessed precourse and postcourse knowledge and attitudes; however, poor follow-up response rate limited demonstration of sustained outcomes or changes in behaviour.</p>","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2024-001062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Effective clinical leadership is required at every level, including in Foundation doctors. Most leadership programmes neglect self-awareness and personal growth aspects of leadership training. We modified the Basildon Leadership Hub to focus on these aspects and evaluated the new programme.
Methods: Large group sessions were led by speakers with varied leadership roles, interspersed by breakout sessions incorporating experiential and reflective learning. Attendees answered anonymous surveys before, immediately after, and 2 months after the workshop, with 5-point Likert-scale responses (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree) designed around reaction, knowledge and behaviour levels of evaluation. We assessed differences in median responses using the Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni-Holm correction.
Results: The full-day workshop was attended by 27 trainees, 93% of whom considered it enjoyable and relevant. Attendees agreed more strongly to the statements 'I am a leader' and 'I know how I can demonstrate and develop my own leadership knowledge, skills and behaviours' in postcourse versus precourse surveys (p<0.001). The follow-up survey had a poor response rate of 26% with non-significant differences.
Conclusion: A full-day leadership workshop for Foundation doctors focusing on personal growth resulted in improvement in self-assessed precourse and postcourse knowledge and attitudes; however, poor follow-up response rate limited demonstration of sustained outcomes or changes in behaviour.