Prospective, Randomized, Intra-subject Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound-guided Thread and Mini-open Carpal Tunnel Release.

Joshua J Meaike, Ike B Hasley, Jeffrey S Brault, Alexander Y Shin
{"title":"Prospective, Randomized, Intra-subject Controlled Trial Comparing Ultrasound-guided Thread and Mini-open Carpal Tunnel Release.","authors":"Joshua J Meaike, Ike B Hasley, Jeffrey S Brault, Alexander Y Shin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a minimally invasive, ultrasound-guided, incisionless thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) compared with mini-open carpal tunnel release (MOR) in a prospective, single-institution, randomized, intrasubject controlled study of patients with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patients underwent same-day, immediately sequential bilateral carpal tunnel surgery receiving both a TCTR and an MOR, with randomization occurring in reference to the dominant versus non-dominant extremity. Eleven patients with an average age of 49.8 years were followed for 12 months. There were no clinical or statistical differences between the two procedures at multiple postoperative time periods with respect to functional outcome scores, pain, or strength. All but one patient preferred TCTR over MOR, citing quicker recovery and decreased pain. Ultrasound-guided TCTR is safe and effective with similar functional outcomes, pain, and strength compared with a more traditional MOR. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 34(1):031-036, 2025).</p>","PeriodicalId":516534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","volume":"34 1","pages":"31-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgical orthopaedic advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a minimally invasive, ultrasound-guided, incisionless thread carpal tunnel release (TCTR) compared with mini-open carpal tunnel release (MOR) in a prospective, single-institution, randomized, intrasubject controlled study of patients with bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Patients underwent same-day, immediately sequential bilateral carpal tunnel surgery receiving both a TCTR and an MOR, with randomization occurring in reference to the dominant versus non-dominant extremity. Eleven patients with an average age of 49.8 years were followed for 12 months. There were no clinical or statistical differences between the two procedures at multiple postoperative time periods with respect to functional outcome scores, pain, or strength. All but one patient preferred TCTR over MOR, citing quicker recovery and decreased pain. Ultrasound-guided TCTR is safe and effective with similar functional outcomes, pain, and strength compared with a more traditional MOR. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 34(1):031-036, 2025).

前瞻性、随机、受试者内对照试验比较超声引导螺纹和小开口腕管松解术。
本研究的目的是在一项前瞻性、单机构、随机、受试者内对照的双侧腕管综合征(CTS)患者研究中,评估微创、超声引导、无切口螺纹腕管松解术(TCTR)与mini-open腕管松解术(MOR)的疗效和安全性。患者接受同日立即序贯双侧腕管手术,接受TCTR和MOR,优势肢与非优势肢随机对照。11例患者平均年龄49.8岁,随访12个月。在术后多个时间段,两种手术在功能结局评分、疼痛或力量方面没有临床或统计学差异。除了一名患者外,所有患者都更喜欢TCTR而不是MOR,理由是恢复更快,疼痛减轻。超声引导下的TCTR与传统的MOR相比,具有相似的功能结果、疼痛和力量,安全有效。[j] .外科骨科进展,34(1):031- 036,2025。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信