[Self-efficacy in Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support among Professionals. Are we overestimating our skills? A multicenter study].

Revista medica de Chile Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-20 DOI:10.4067/s0034-98872025000100053
Sebastián Turner-Pantoja, Nancy Bastías-Vega, Marjorie Baquedano-Rodríguez
{"title":"[Self-efficacy in Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support among Professionals. Are we overestimating our skills? A multicenter study].","authors":"Sebastián Turner-Pantoja, Nancy Bastías-Vega, Marjorie Baquedano-Rodríguez","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872025000100053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Self-efficacy, understood as confidence in one's ability to execute specific tasks successfully, is a key factor in the performance of healthcare professionals in emergency situations. In the context of Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), which requires quick decision-making and the precise execution of technical skills, self-assessment of one's abilities is essential to ensure quality care and patient safety. However, the question arises: could overconfidence compromise actual performance in critical settings?</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To evaluate ACLS self-efficacy among healthcare professionals in public hospitals and compare it with their actual performance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>90 healthcare professionals from five public hospitals in a central region of Chile were included. ACLS self-efficacy was measured using an instrument specifically designed for emergency care, while practical ACLS skills were evaluated based on the American Heart Association® guidelines. Additionally, cognitive skills were assessed using a tool developed for this study. Self-efficacy was then compared to actual performance in both practical and cognitive skills.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study identified a significant discrepancy between self-reported confidence and actual ACLS skills. Although many professionals reported high confidence levels in their abilities, their practical and cognitive performance was considerably lower than expected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals a significant gap between self-efficacy and actual performance in ACLS, suggesting that professionals with lower skill proficiency overestimate their abilities due to metacognitive biases, aligning with the Dunning-Kruger effect - potentially impacting the quality of patient care. Addressing this discrepancy through targeted education and practical simulations is crucial to improving emergency outcomes and patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"153 1","pages":"53-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872025000100053","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Self-efficacy, understood as confidence in one's ability to execute specific tasks successfully, is a key factor in the performance of healthcare professionals in emergency situations. In the context of Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), which requires quick decision-making and the precise execution of technical skills, self-assessment of one's abilities is essential to ensure quality care and patient safety. However, the question arises: could overconfidence compromise actual performance in critical settings?

Aim: To evaluate ACLS self-efficacy among healthcare professionals in public hospitals and compare it with their actual performance.

Methods: 90 healthcare professionals from five public hospitals in a central region of Chile were included. ACLS self-efficacy was measured using an instrument specifically designed for emergency care, while practical ACLS skills were evaluated based on the American Heart Association® guidelines. Additionally, cognitive skills were assessed using a tool developed for this study. Self-efficacy was then compared to actual performance in both practical and cognitive skills.

Results: This study identified a significant discrepancy between self-reported confidence and actual ACLS skills. Although many professionals reported high confidence levels in their abilities, their practical and cognitive performance was considerably lower than expected.

Conclusions: This study reveals a significant gap between self-efficacy and actual performance in ACLS, suggesting that professionals with lower skill proficiency overestimate their abilities due to metacognitive biases, aligning with the Dunning-Kruger effect - potentially impacting the quality of patient care. Addressing this discrepancy through targeted education and practical simulations is crucial to improving emergency outcomes and patient safety.

专业人员高级心血管生命支持的自我效能。我们是否高估了自己的技能?多中心研究]。
自我效能,被理解为对一个人成功执行特定任务的能力的信心,是医疗保健专业人员在紧急情况下表现的关键因素。在高级心血管生命支持(ACLS)的背景下,需要快速决策和精确执行技术技能,自我评估能力对于确保高质量的护理和患者安全至关重要。然而,问题来了:过度自信会影响关键环境中的实际表现吗?目的:评价公立医院医护人员ACLS自我效能感,并与实际表现进行比较。方法:来自智利中部地区5家公立医院的90名卫生保健专业人员。ACLS自我效能使用专门为急诊护理设计的仪器进行测量,而实际ACLS技能则根据美国心脏协会®指南进行评估。此外,使用为本研究开发的工具评估认知技能。然后将自我效能感与实践技能和认知技能的实际表现进行比较。结果:本研究确定了自我报告的自信与实际ACLS技能之间的显著差异。尽管许多专业人士对自己的能力有很高的信心,但他们的实践和认知表现却远低于预期。结论:本研究揭示了ACLS患者的自我效能与实际表现之间存在显著差距,表明较低技能熟练程度的专业人员由于元认知偏差而高估了自己的能力,这与邓宁-克鲁格效应一致,可能影响患者护理质量。通过有针对性的教育和实际模拟来解决这一差异,对于改善急诊结果和患者安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信