A causal link between handwashing and risk of infection? Examination of the evidence.

Infection control : IC Pub Date : 1988-01-01
E Larson
{"title":"A causal link between handwashing and risk of infection? Examination of the evidence.","authors":"E Larson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To examine evidence of a causal link between handwashing and risk of infection, a review of published literature from 1879 through 1986 was conducted. In the 107 years studied, 423 articles specifically related to handwashing were found. Articles were categorized as studies to evaluate products (50.8%), review articles (29.1%), behavioral studies (10.9%), methodologic studies (2.8%), studies linking handwashing to infection (3.3%), and other (3.1%). There was an increase in the proportion of handwashing articles published in the 1980s with the rate (9.4/10(5) citations/year) being almost double that of any other period studied. Nonexperimental and experimental studies related to handwashing were reviewed and evidence for a causal association evaluated. Except for specificity, all the elements for causality, including temporality, strength, plausibility, consistency of the association, and dose response were present. It was therefore concluded that emphasis on handwashing as a primary infection control measure has not been misplaced and should continue.</p>","PeriodicalId":77726,"journal":{"name":"Infection control : IC","volume":"9 1","pages":"28-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection control : IC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To examine evidence of a causal link between handwashing and risk of infection, a review of published literature from 1879 through 1986 was conducted. In the 107 years studied, 423 articles specifically related to handwashing were found. Articles were categorized as studies to evaluate products (50.8%), review articles (29.1%), behavioral studies (10.9%), methodologic studies (2.8%), studies linking handwashing to infection (3.3%), and other (3.1%). There was an increase in the proportion of handwashing articles published in the 1980s with the rate (9.4/10(5) citations/year) being almost double that of any other period studied. Nonexperimental and experimental studies related to handwashing were reviewed and evidence for a causal association evaluated. Except for specificity, all the elements for causality, including temporality, strength, plausibility, consistency of the association, and dose response were present. It was therefore concluded that emphasis on handwashing as a primary infection control measure has not been misplaced and should continue.

洗手与感染风险之间的因果关系?证据的审查。
为了研究洗手与感染风险之间的因果关系,研究人员对1879年至1986年发表的文献进行了回顾。在107年的研究中,发现了423篇专门与洗手有关的文章。文章被分类为产品评价研究(50.8%)、综述研究(29.1%)、行为研究(10.9%)、方法学研究(2.8%)、将洗手与感染联系起来的研究(3.3%)和其他(3.1%)。在1980年代发表的洗手文章的比例有所增加,其比率(每年9.4/10(5)次)几乎是其他研究时期的两倍。我们回顾了与洗手相关的非实验和实验研究,并评估了因果关系的证据。除特异性外,因果关系的所有要素,包括时间性、强度、合理性、关联的一致性和剂量反应都存在。因此得出结论,强调洗手作为主要感染控制措施并没有错,应继续下去。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信