Association of Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry and Mortality Outcomes Compared With Normal Spirometry: A Meta-Analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Respiratory care Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-25 DOI:10.1089/respcare.11653
Viraj Panchal, Shubhika Jain, Aasa Deepika Kuditipudi, Sravya Sri Kuchipudi, Rahul Vyas, Bhavya Vyas, Saketh Palasamudram Shekar
{"title":"Association of Preserved Ratio Impaired Spirometry and Mortality Outcomes Compared With Normal Spirometry: A Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Viraj Panchal, Shubhika Jain, Aasa Deepika Kuditipudi, Sravya Sri Kuchipudi, Rahul Vyas, Bhavya Vyas, Saketh Palasamudram Shekar","doi":"10.1089/respcare.11653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> One of the leading causes of death in the United States is chronic lung disease, with COPD being the most common. One of the hallmarks of COPD is spirometric obstruction as evidenced by a reduced FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio. Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) is a spirometric pattern characterized as a low FEV<sub>1</sub> coupled with a preserved FEV<sub>1</sub>/FVC ratio. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to understand better the relationship between PRISm and cardiovascular, respiratory, and all-cause mortality. <b>Methods:</b> We systematically searched PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov for articles published between 2014 and 2023, providing data regarding the association of PRISm compared with normal spirometry in terms of morality outcomes. The generic inverse variance method was used to assess the pooled hazard ratio value at a 95% CI, and forest plots were created using RevMan for analysis. <i>P</i> < .05 was considered to be significant. <b>Results:</b> Our analysis included 690,015 subjects from four prospective studies and three retrospective studies. The pooled hazard ratio for all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory-related mortality was 1.70, 1.95, and 5.70 for all prospective studies, respectively, and 1.62, 1.66, and 3.35, in combined prospective and retrospective studies, respectively, which were statistically significant in the random effect model (<i>P</i> < .001). However, 76% heterogeneity was observed in respiratory-related mortality (<i>P</i> = .009). After excluding studies associated with publication bias, a \"leave-out\" sensitive analysis resulted in a significant pooled hazard ratio of 1.98 with a high significance (<i>P</i> < .001). <b>Conclusions:</b> PRISm, often labeled as GOLD-U, is associated with mortality outcomes and should not be overlooked while treating patients with chronic lung diseases. This meta-analysis provides a stronger correlation of PRISm with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and respiratory mortality compared with normal spirometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":21125,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory care","volume":" ","pages":"914-921"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/respcare.11653","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: One of the leading causes of death in the United States is chronic lung disease, with COPD being the most common. One of the hallmarks of COPD is spirometric obstruction as evidenced by a reduced FEV1/FVC ratio. Preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm) is a spirometric pattern characterized as a low FEV1 coupled with a preserved FEV1/FVC ratio. This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to understand better the relationship between PRISm and cardiovascular, respiratory, and all-cause mortality. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov for articles published between 2014 and 2023, providing data regarding the association of PRISm compared with normal spirometry in terms of morality outcomes. The generic inverse variance method was used to assess the pooled hazard ratio value at a 95% CI, and forest plots were created using RevMan for analysis. P < .05 was considered to be significant. Results: Our analysis included 690,015 subjects from four prospective studies and three retrospective studies. The pooled hazard ratio for all-cause, cardiovascular, and respiratory-related mortality was 1.70, 1.95, and 5.70 for all prospective studies, respectively, and 1.62, 1.66, and 3.35, in combined prospective and retrospective studies, respectively, which were statistically significant in the random effect model (P < .001). However, 76% heterogeneity was observed in respiratory-related mortality (P = .009). After excluding studies associated with publication bias, a "leave-out" sensitive analysis resulted in a significant pooled hazard ratio of 1.98 with a high significance (P < .001). Conclusions: PRISm, often labeled as GOLD-U, is associated with mortality outcomes and should not be overlooked while treating patients with chronic lung diseases. This meta-analysis provides a stronger correlation of PRISm with all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and respiratory mortality compared with normal spirometry.

与正常肺活量计相比,保存比例受损肺活量计与死亡率结果的关联:一项荟萃分析。
背景:在美国,导致死亡的主要原因之一是慢性肺部疾病,其中COPD最为常见。COPD的标志之一是肺活量阻塞性肺阻塞,FEV1/FVC比值降低就是证据。保存比受损肺活量测定(PRISm)是一种肺活量测定模式,其特征是低FEV1加上保存的FEV1/FVC比。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在更好地了解PRISm与心血管、呼吸和全因死亡率之间的关系。方法:系统检索PubMed和clinicaltrials.gov网站2014 - 2023年间发表的文章,提供PRISm与正常肺活量测定在道德结局方面的关联数据。采用通用反方差法在95% CI下评估合并风险比值,并使用RevMan创建森林样地进行分析。P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:我们的分析包括来自4项前瞻性研究和3项回顾性研究的690,015名受试者。所有前瞻性研究的全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和呼吸相关死亡率的合并风险比分别为1.70、1.95和5.70,联合前瞻性和回顾性研究的合并风险比分别为1.62、1.66和3.35,在随机效应模型中具有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。然而,呼吸相关死亡率存在76%的异质性(P = 0.009)。在排除了与发表偏倚相关的研究后,“遗漏”敏感分析结果显示,合并风险比为1.98,具有高度显著性(P < 0.001)。结论:PRISm通常被标记为GOLD-U,与死亡率结果相关,在治疗慢性肺部疾病患者时不应忽视。该荟萃分析显示,与正常肺活量测定相比,PRISm与全因死亡率、心血管死亡率和呼吸死亡率的相关性更强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Respiratory care
Respiratory care 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
16.00%
发文量
209
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RESPIRATORY CARE is the official monthly science journal of the American Association for Respiratory Care. It is indexed in PubMed and included in ISI''s Web of Science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信