The meaning of "total pain" in the context of living and dying with dementia.

IF 2.2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2025-04-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1412749
Sarah Elizabeth Field-Richards, Louise Bramley, Jemima Collins, Alison Cowley, Rowan Harwood
{"title":"The meaning of \"total pain\" in the context of living and dying with dementia.","authors":"Sarah Elizabeth Field-Richards, Louise Bramley, Jemima Collins, Alison Cowley, Rowan Harwood","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1412749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Globally, there are 55 million people living with dementia (PLWD). PLWD have an uncertain prognosis. Most are approaching the end of life but are not overtly or immediately dying. Contemporary approaches to dementia care therefore promote the need to live and die well with dementia. Pain is highly prevalent but difficult to manage in PLWD. Originating in palliative care, \"total pain\" conceives of pain holistically, incorporating biological, psychological, social and spiritual elements. Pain management in dementia care tends to be pharmacologically focused. Total pain therefore offers an alternative approach-one consistent with person-centred philosophy underpinning contemporary dementia care. Due to important differences, concepts cannot simply be extrapolated from cancer-related to dementia-related palliative care however. Dementia-specific approaches are needed and require exploration.</p><p><strong>Description and objective of the analysis: </strong>The objective of this paper is to explore the meaning of total pain in the context of living and dying with dementia, and its utility and implications for person-centred dementia care. Using a palliative care framework and existing literature, we critically consider the bio-psycho-socio-spiritual impact of dementia, to explore how total pain might manifest and be experienced in this context.</p><p><strong>Findings and interpretation: </strong>We highlight the complexity, nuance and socially contingent nature of the impact of living and dying with dementia. We challenge binary understandings of \"continuity or loss\" (e.g., of identity, relationships), and totalising \"loss\" discourses, demonstrating that more subtle, varied and hopeful outcomes are possible. The way that the impact of dementia is articulated and understood has implications for the experience and management of total pain. The deficit-orientation of \"total <i>pain</i>\" paradoxically risks its perpetuation. A balanced understanding of dementia's impact (acknowledging <i>both</i> continuity and loss, alternatives and socially constructed aspects) better reflects the realities of dementia and creates new possibilities for supportive care practices to improve pain management and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion and implications for practice: </strong>Applied to dementia care, \"total pain\" should be located within a critical context, emphasising complexity, contingency and nuance. The holistic focus of \"<i>total</i> pain\" should be extended to incorporate balanced consideration of \"painful\" and \"functional\" experience. We introduce a balanced model of total pain incorporating a dual focus on \"pain\" and \"personhood\" within a critical context, to facilitate translation to practice. There is a need to develop evidence-based supportive interventions in each domain of total pain, to support a balanced approach to total pain management in dementia care.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":"9 ","pages":"1412749"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12016222/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1412749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Globally, there are 55 million people living with dementia (PLWD). PLWD have an uncertain prognosis. Most are approaching the end of life but are not overtly or immediately dying. Contemporary approaches to dementia care therefore promote the need to live and die well with dementia. Pain is highly prevalent but difficult to manage in PLWD. Originating in palliative care, "total pain" conceives of pain holistically, incorporating biological, psychological, social and spiritual elements. Pain management in dementia care tends to be pharmacologically focused. Total pain therefore offers an alternative approach-one consistent with person-centred philosophy underpinning contemporary dementia care. Due to important differences, concepts cannot simply be extrapolated from cancer-related to dementia-related palliative care however. Dementia-specific approaches are needed and require exploration.

Description and objective of the analysis: The objective of this paper is to explore the meaning of total pain in the context of living and dying with dementia, and its utility and implications for person-centred dementia care. Using a palliative care framework and existing literature, we critically consider the bio-psycho-socio-spiritual impact of dementia, to explore how total pain might manifest and be experienced in this context.

Findings and interpretation: We highlight the complexity, nuance and socially contingent nature of the impact of living and dying with dementia. We challenge binary understandings of "continuity or loss" (e.g., of identity, relationships), and totalising "loss" discourses, demonstrating that more subtle, varied and hopeful outcomes are possible. The way that the impact of dementia is articulated and understood has implications for the experience and management of total pain. The deficit-orientation of "total pain" paradoxically risks its perpetuation. A balanced understanding of dementia's impact (acknowledging both continuity and loss, alternatives and socially constructed aspects) better reflects the realities of dementia and creates new possibilities for supportive care practices to improve pain management and quality of life.

Conclusion and implications for practice: Applied to dementia care, "total pain" should be located within a critical context, emphasising complexity, contingency and nuance. The holistic focus of "total pain" should be extended to incorporate balanced consideration of "painful" and "functional" experience. We introduce a balanced model of total pain incorporating a dual focus on "pain" and "personhood" within a critical context, to facilitate translation to practice. There is a need to develop evidence-based supportive interventions in each domain of total pain, to support a balanced approach to total pain management in dementia care.

在患有痴呆症的生活和死亡的背景下,“完全疼痛”的意义。
背景:全球有5500万人患有痴呆症(PLWD)。PLWD预后不确定。大多数人正在接近生命的尽头,但并没有明显或立即死亡。因此,当代痴呆症护理方法促进了与痴呆症一起健康生活和健康死亡的需求。疼痛在PLWD中非常普遍,但难以控制。“完全疼痛”起源于姑息治疗,从整体上考虑疼痛,包括生物、心理、社会和精神因素。痴呆护理中的疼痛管理往往以药理学为重点。因此,全面疼痛提供了另一种方法——一种与当代痴呆症护理以人为本的理念相一致的方法。然而,由于重要的差异,概念不能简单地从癌症相关到痴呆症相关的姑息治疗中推断出来。我们需要并探索针对痴呆症的治疗方法。描述和分析的目的:本文的目的是探讨生活和死亡与痴呆症的背景下的总疼痛的意义,以及它的效用和影响,以人为中心的痴呆症护理。使用姑息治疗框架和现有文献,我们批判性地考虑痴呆症的生物-心理-社会-精神影响,探索在这种情况下如何表现和体验总疼痛。研究结果和解释:我们强调了痴呆症对生存和死亡影响的复杂性、细微差别和社会偶然性。我们挑战对“连续性或损失”的二元理解(例如,身份,关系),以及对“损失”话语的综合理解,证明更微妙,更多样化和更有希望的结果是可能的。痴呆症的影响被明确表达和理解的方式对完全疼痛的体验和管理有影响。以赤字为导向的“全面痛苦”自相矛盾地冒着这种痛苦永久化的风险。对痴呆症影响的平衡理解(承认连续性和损失、替代方案和社会建构方面)更好地反映痴呆症的现实,并为支持性护理实践创造新的可能性,以改善疼痛管理和生活质量。结论和实践意义:应用于痴呆症护理,“完全疼痛”应该定位在一个关键的背景下,强调复杂性,偶然性和细微差别。“全部痛苦”的整体焦点应该扩展到“痛苦”和“功能”体验的平衡考虑。我们引入了一个平衡的全痛模型,在一个关键的背景下,结合对“疼痛”和“人格”的双重关注,以促进翻译到实践。有必要在全痛的每个领域开发基于证据的支持性干预措施,以支持痴呆护理中全痛管理的平衡方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信