A neural network approach to glomerular filtration rate estimation: a single-centre retrospective audit.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nuclear Medicine Communications Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1097/MNM.0000000000001982
Jack A Johnson, Richard Meades, Nathan J Dickinson
{"title":"A neural network approach to glomerular filtration rate estimation: a single-centre retrospective audit.","authors":"Jack A Johnson, Richard Meades, Nathan J Dickinson","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation without race correction factor is frequently used for an estimate of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and to support a single-sample GFR regime. This study examines whether neural networks offer a potential means to improve the accuracy of GFR estimates using the same initial inputs as eGFR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An audit of 865 adult GFR examinations and serum creatinine measurements between January 2010 and 2024 was undertaken. Patient sex, age, creatinine, and measured GFR were used to train a neural network (NN) model with an 80 : 20 train-test split, with test set root mean square error (RMSE), accuracy, median bias, and sensitivity calculated and compared against the 2009 CKD-EPI equation eGFR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>NN GFR showed an improved performance against the 2009 CKD-EPI equation in RMSE: 12.0 vs. 16.6 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ( P  < 0.001), median bias: -2.50 vs. 7.86 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ( P  < 0.001) and accuracy: 94.2 vs. 83.2% ( P  < 0.001). Both NN GFR and the eGFR equation had poor sensitivity across the British Nuclear Medicine Society single-sample ranges of 25-50, 50-70, 70-100, and >100 mL/min/1.73 m 2 : 57.9 vs. 57.9%, 50.0 vs. 26.9%, 84.4 vs. 54.2%, 10.0 vs. 70.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has suggested that locally trained NNs can offer a potential avenue to improve GFR predictions, even on small and diverse datasets.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Although the model is not sufficiently sensitive to predict the optimum time-sample point for a single-sample regime, this work can serve as a proof of concept for UK-specific NN GFR models.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":"620-628"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12136396/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001982","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The 2009 Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation without race correction factor is frequently used for an estimate of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and to support a single-sample GFR regime. This study examines whether neural networks offer a potential means to improve the accuracy of GFR estimates using the same initial inputs as eGFR.

Methods: An audit of 865 adult GFR examinations and serum creatinine measurements between January 2010 and 2024 was undertaken. Patient sex, age, creatinine, and measured GFR were used to train a neural network (NN) model with an 80 : 20 train-test split, with test set root mean square error (RMSE), accuracy, median bias, and sensitivity calculated and compared against the 2009 CKD-EPI equation eGFR.

Results: NN GFR showed an improved performance against the 2009 CKD-EPI equation in RMSE: 12.0 vs. 16.6 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ( P  < 0.001), median bias: -2.50 vs. 7.86 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ( P  < 0.001) and accuracy: 94.2 vs. 83.2% ( P  < 0.001). Both NN GFR and the eGFR equation had poor sensitivity across the British Nuclear Medicine Society single-sample ranges of 25-50, 50-70, 70-100, and >100 mL/min/1.73 m 2 : 57.9 vs. 57.9%, 50.0 vs. 26.9%, 84.4 vs. 54.2%, 10.0 vs. 70.0%.

Conclusion: This study has suggested that locally trained NNs can offer a potential avenue to improve GFR predictions, even on small and diverse datasets.

Advances in knowledge: Although the model is not sufficiently sensitive to predict the optimum time-sample point for a single-sample regime, this work can serve as a proof of concept for UK-specific NN GFR models.

神经网络方法肾小球滤过率估计:单中心回顾性审计。
目的:2009年慢性肾脏疾病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)不含种族校正因子的方程经常用于估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR),并支持单样本GFR方案。本研究考察了神经网络是否提供了一种潜在的方法,可以使用与eGFR相同的初始输入来提高GFR估计的准确性。方法:对2010年1月至2024年间865例成人GFR检查和血清肌酐测定进行审计。使用患者的性别、年龄、肌酐和测量的GFR来训练一个神经网络(NN)模型,该模型采用80:20训练-检验分割,计算检验集均方根误差(RMSE)、准确性、中位偏差和灵敏度,并与2009年CKD-EPI方程eGFR进行比较。结果:NN GFR对2009年CKD-EPI方程的RMSE表现出改善的性能:12.0对16.6 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p100 mL/min/1.73 m2: 57.9对57.9%,50.0对26.9%,84.4对54.2%,10.0对70.0%)。结论:本研究表明,局部训练的神经网络可以提供一种改进GFR预测的潜在途径,即使是在小而多样的数据集上。知识进展:尽管该模型不够敏感,无法预测单样本状态下的最佳时间样本点,但这项工作可以作为英国特定NN GFR模型的概念证明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信