Bedroom Sharing, Retention, and Mental Health Among Soldiers Living in U.S. Army Barracks.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Matthew R Beymer, Cheri L Roseberry, Kirsten M Anke, Christopher G Hill, Erin M Anderson Goodell, Melissa M Boyd, Esther J Pfau
{"title":"Bedroom Sharing, Retention, and Mental Health Among Soldiers Living in U.S. Army Barracks.","authors":"Matthew R Beymer, Cheri L Roseberry, Kirsten M Anke, Christopher G Hill, Erin M Anderson Goodell, Melissa M Boyd, Esther J Pfau","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Little is known about the potential impact of shared versus private bedroom barracks configurations on the quality of life, retention, and mental health of enlisted Soldiers in the U.S. Army. The objective of the present study was to use a sample of enlisted U.S. Army Soldiers from five different installations to assess the differences in behavioral and social health outcomes between respondents in shared versus private bedroom configurations.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The unaccompanied housing survey was administered to unaccompanied housing (UH) barracks residents at 5 different U.S. Army installations from July to November 2022 (n = 8,703). The main risk factor of interest was bedroom sharing (shared versus private), and the main outcomes of interest were intentions to leave the military after the current enlistment period (intent to leave), quality of life, issues experienced with others while living in the barracks, insufficient sleep, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and loneliness. Seven separate multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations between bedroom sharing and the outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty percent of UH respondents reported residing in a private bedroom and 40% reported sharing a bedroom. UH respondents who lived in shared bedrooms had higher adjusted odds of poorer quality of life (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54-1.82) when compared to respondents in private bedrooms. Respondents who lived in shared bedrooms also had a higher adjusted odds of reporting issues with others while living in the barracks (AOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.33-1.63) compared to respondents in private bedrooms. The models analyzing the association between bedroom sharing and intentions to leave, sleep, anxiety, and loneliness were statistically significant, but the lower level of the CI demonstrated that the associations were not clinically meaningful. There was no statistically significant association between bedroom sharing and depression (AOR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.98-1.22). There were no meaningful differences in the types of issues reported between those who lived in shared and private bedrooms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Bedroom sharing was associated with greater adverse behavioral and social health outcomes when compared to private bedrooms for a large sample of UH residents in the U.S. Army. Findings indicated private bedrooms may be more beneficial for quality of life, readiness, and reenlistment rates among Army Soldiers residing in the barracks. These findings should be used in the development of future studies aimed at assessing Soldier quality of life, as well as to inform Army Senior Leaders and decision makers during development of prevention and risk mitigation strategies and policies on barracks configurations.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"e2079-e2086"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf133","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Little is known about the potential impact of shared versus private bedroom barracks configurations on the quality of life, retention, and mental health of enlisted Soldiers in the U.S. Army. The objective of the present study was to use a sample of enlisted U.S. Army Soldiers from five different installations to assess the differences in behavioral and social health outcomes between respondents in shared versus private bedroom configurations.

Materials and methods: The unaccompanied housing survey was administered to unaccompanied housing (UH) barracks residents at 5 different U.S. Army installations from July to November 2022 (n = 8,703). The main risk factor of interest was bedroom sharing (shared versus private), and the main outcomes of interest were intentions to leave the military after the current enlistment period (intent to leave), quality of life, issues experienced with others while living in the barracks, insufficient sleep, and symptoms of depression, anxiety, and loneliness. Seven separate multivariable logistic regression models were used to evaluate the associations between bedroom sharing and the outcomes.

Results: Sixty percent of UH respondents reported residing in a private bedroom and 40% reported sharing a bedroom. UH respondents who lived in shared bedrooms had higher adjusted odds of poorer quality of life (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.67; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54-1.82) when compared to respondents in private bedrooms. Respondents who lived in shared bedrooms also had a higher adjusted odds of reporting issues with others while living in the barracks (AOR: 1.47; 95% CI: 1.33-1.63) compared to respondents in private bedrooms. The models analyzing the association between bedroom sharing and intentions to leave, sleep, anxiety, and loneliness were statistically significant, but the lower level of the CI demonstrated that the associations were not clinically meaningful. There was no statistically significant association between bedroom sharing and depression (AOR: 1.09; 95% CI: 0.98-1.22). There were no meaningful differences in the types of issues reported between those who lived in shared and private bedrooms.

Conclusions: Bedroom sharing was associated with greater adverse behavioral and social health outcomes when compared to private bedrooms for a large sample of UH residents in the U.S. Army. Findings indicated private bedrooms may be more beneficial for quality of life, readiness, and reenlistment rates among Army Soldiers residing in the barracks. These findings should be used in the development of future studies aimed at assessing Soldier quality of life, as well as to inform Army Senior Leaders and decision makers during development of prevention and risk mitigation strategies and policies on barracks configurations.

美国军营士兵的卧室共用、保留和心理健康。
关于共用和私人卧室兵营配置对美国陆军士兵的生活质量、保留率和心理健康的潜在影响,我们知之甚少。本研究的目的是使用来自五个不同设施的美国陆军士兵的样本来评估共享卧室和私人卧室配置的受访者在行为和社会健康结果方面的差异。材料和方法:在2022年7月至11月期间,对5个不同美国陆军基地的无人陪伴住房(UH)营房居民进行了无人陪伴住房调查(n = 8,703)。感兴趣的主要风险因素是卧室共享(共享与私人),感兴趣的主要结果是在当前入伍期后离开军队的意图(离开意图),生活质量,在军营生活时与他人经历的问题,睡眠不足以及抑郁,焦虑和孤独的症状。七个独立的多变量逻辑回归模型被用来评估共用卧室和结果之间的关系。结果:60%的UH受访者报告住在一个单独的卧室,40%的人报告共用一个卧室。住在共用卧室的UH受访者生活质量较差的调整概率更高(调整比值比[AOR]: 1.67;95%可信区间[CI]: 1.54-1.82),与私人卧室的受访者相比。住在共用卧室的受访者在住在军营时与他人报告问题的调整后几率也更高(AOR: 1.47;95%置信区间:1.33-1.63),与私人卧室的受访者相比。分析卧室共享与离开意愿、睡眠、焦虑和孤独之间关联的模型在统计上是显著的,但较低的CI水平表明这种关联没有临床意义。共用卧室与抑郁无显著相关性(AOR: 1.09;95% ci: 0.98-1.22)。共有卧室和独立卧室的人所报告的问题类型没有显著差异。结论:与私人卧室相比,共用卧室与更大的不良行为和社会健康结果有关。研究结果表明,对于住在军营里的陆军士兵来说,私人卧室可能对生活质量、准备情况和重新入伍率更有利。这些研究结果应用于开展旨在评估士兵生活质量的未来研究,并在制定有关兵营配置的预防和减轻风险战略和政策期间为陆军高级领导人和决策者提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信