First-trimester exposure to macrolides and risk of major congenital malformations compared with amoxicillin: A French nationwide cohort study.

IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine
PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004576
Anh Tran, Mahmoud Zureik, Jeanne Sibiude, Sara Miranda, Jérôme Drouin, Lise Marty, Alain Weill, Rosemary Dray-Spira, Xavier Duval, Sarah Tubiana
{"title":"First-trimester exposure to macrolides and risk of major congenital malformations compared with amoxicillin: A French nationwide cohort study.","authors":"Anh Tran, Mahmoud Zureik, Jeanne Sibiude, Sara Miranda, Jérôme Drouin, Lise Marty, Alain Weill, Rosemary Dray-Spira, Xavier Duval, Sarah Tubiana","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004576","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While macrolides are among the frequently prescribed antibiotics for pregnant women, evidence of their fetal safety remains conflicting. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of major congenital malformations (MCM) after first-trimester exposure to macrolides compared with amoxicillin, focusing on specific MCM subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>This nationwide cohort study used data from the Mother-Child EPI-MERES Register nested in the French Health Data System (SNDS). Pregnancies linked with their singleton live-born infants from January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020, were included. The macrolide exposure group comprised pregnancies with one or more prescriptions filled for systemic macrolides (erythromycin, spiramycin, roxithromycin, josamycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin) during the first trimester. The comparator group comprised pregnancies exposed to amoxicillin during the first trimester. Adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% CI were estimated by log-binomial regression for any MCM overall and individual MCMs with a prevalence of at least one per 10,000 live-born infants in the macrolide exposure group. Among 7,644,579 eligible pregnancies, 140,708 exposed to macrolides and 592,652 exposed to amoxicillin were included. After adjustment for measured confounders, macrolide exposure during the first trimester was not associated with any MCM overall (aRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.05) compared with amoxicillin. Specifically, no increased risk was found for most individual MCMs. However, an increase in the risk for spina bifida (aRR 1.82, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.71) and syndactyly (aRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.58) was observed. The adjusted risk difference per 10,000 live-born infants was 1.15 (95% CI 0.26 to 2.05) for spina bifida and 0.87 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.72) for syndactyly. Sensitivity analyses consistently yielded elevated point estimates for these two MCMs, despite wide confidence intervals and small numbers of events. Residual confounding by indication is possible.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings indicate that macrolide exposure during the first trimester is not strongly associated with an increased risk for most individual MCMs, which is reassuring. However, an increased risk of spina bifida and syndactyly remains possible. Future studies are required to investigate these observations further as evidence continues to grow.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 4","pages":"e1004576"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12021278/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004576","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While macrolides are among the frequently prescribed antibiotics for pregnant women, evidence of their fetal safety remains conflicting. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of major congenital malformations (MCM) after first-trimester exposure to macrolides compared with amoxicillin, focusing on specific MCM subtypes.

Methods and findings: This nationwide cohort study used data from the Mother-Child EPI-MERES Register nested in the French Health Data System (SNDS). Pregnancies linked with their singleton live-born infants from January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020, were included. The macrolide exposure group comprised pregnancies with one or more prescriptions filled for systemic macrolides (erythromycin, spiramycin, roxithromycin, josamycin, clarithromycin, and azithromycin) during the first trimester. The comparator group comprised pregnancies exposed to amoxicillin during the first trimester. Adjusted relative risks (aRR) and 95% CI were estimated by log-binomial regression for any MCM overall and individual MCMs with a prevalence of at least one per 10,000 live-born infants in the macrolide exposure group. Among 7,644,579 eligible pregnancies, 140,708 exposed to macrolides and 592,652 exposed to amoxicillin were included. After adjustment for measured confounders, macrolide exposure during the first trimester was not associated with any MCM overall (aRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.05) compared with amoxicillin. Specifically, no increased risk was found for most individual MCMs. However, an increase in the risk for spina bifida (aRR 1.82, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.71) and syndactyly (aRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.06 to 2.58) was observed. The adjusted risk difference per 10,000 live-born infants was 1.15 (95% CI 0.26 to 2.05) for spina bifida and 0.87 (95% CI 0.01 to 1.72) for syndactyly. Sensitivity analyses consistently yielded elevated point estimates for these two MCMs, despite wide confidence intervals and small numbers of events. Residual confounding by indication is possible.

Conclusions: The findings indicate that macrolide exposure during the first trimester is not strongly associated with an increased risk for most individual MCMs, which is reassuring. However, an increased risk of spina bifida and syndactyly remains possible. Future studies are required to investigate these observations further as evidence continues to grow.

与阿莫西林相比,孕早期暴露于大环内酯类药物和主要先天性畸形的风险:一项法国全国队列研究。
背景:虽然大环内酯类药物是孕妇常用的抗生素之一,但其胎儿安全性的证据仍然存在争议。本研究旨在评估孕早期暴露于大环内酯类药物与阿莫西林后发生重大先天性畸形(MCM)的风险,重点关注特定的MCM亚型。方法和发现:这项全国性队列研究使用了法国卫生数据系统(SNDS)中嵌套的母婴EPI-MERES登记册的数据。包括2010年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间与单胎活产婴儿相关的妊娠。大环内酯暴露组包括妊娠早期服用一种或多种全身性大环内酯类药物(红霉素、螺旋霉素、罗红霉素、乔霉素、克拉霉素和阿奇霉素)的孕妇。比较组包括妊娠早期暴露于阿莫西林的孕妇。通过对数二项回归估计大环内酯暴露组中任何MCM总体和个体MCM的校正相对危险度(aRR)和95% CI, MCM的患病率至少为1 / 10,000活产婴儿。在7,644,579例符合条件的妊娠中,140708例暴露于大环内酯类药物,592,652例暴露于阿莫西林。在对测量的混杂因素进行调整后,与阿莫西林相比,孕早期大环内酯暴露与总体MCM无关(aRR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96至1.05)。具体来说,大多数mcm个体没有发现风险增加。然而,观察到脊柱裂(aRR 1.82, 95% CI 1.22 - 2.71)和并指(aRR 1.65, 95% CI 1.06 - 2.58)的风险增加。每10000名活产婴儿中,脊柱裂校正风险差为1.15 (95% CI 0.26 - 2.05),并指畸形校正风险差为0.87 (95% CI 0.01 - 1.72)。敏感性分析一致得出这两种mcm的高点估计值,尽管置信区间很宽,事件数量很少。可能存在指征引起的残留混淆。结论:研究结果表明,孕早期大环内酯暴露与大多数mcm个体风险增加没有强烈关联,这是令人放心的。然而,脊柱裂和并指畸形的风险增加仍然是可能的。随着证据的不断增加,未来的研究需要进一步调查这些观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信