Rural Emergency Medical Services Perspectives on Improving Acute Stroke Care: A Qualitative Study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Emma N Johnson, Mahesh V Pinapaka, Mary E Grewe, Lindsay E Stewart, Edward C Jauch, Jane H Brice, James E Winslow, Mehul D Patel
{"title":"Rural Emergency Medical Services Perspectives on Improving Acute Stroke Care: A Qualitative Study.","authors":"Emma N Johnson, Mahesh V Pinapaka, Mary E Grewe, Lindsay E Stewart, Edward C Jauch, Jane H Brice, James E Winslow, Mehul D Patel","doi":"10.1080/10903127.2025.2490180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>For underserved rural communities with limited geographical access to comprehensive stroke centers, emergency medical services (EMS) play a crucial role in timely, high-quality acute stroke care. This qualitative study aimed to understand rural EMS perspectives on barriers and facilitators to optimal acute stroke care in rural communities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with rural EMS professionals. Ten EMS agencies in North Carolina were contacted for participation in virtual 45-60 minute interviews and interested agency professionals self-selected into the study. Covered topics included stroke training and education; stroke care experience and expertise; clinical and sociodemographic patient characteristics; EMS workflows; and system- and patient-level interactions and outcomes. Recorded interviews were transcribed and then coded using an inductive and deductive, iterative approach by two independent reviewers in MAXQDA software. Facilitators and barriers to optimal acute stroke care were derived from thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve EMS professionals from 4 rural EMS agencies and 1 mixed urban-rural agency were interviewed. Participants worked in clinical (6 Paramedics, 1 EMT) and leadership (2 chiefs, 1 supervisor, 1 field training officer, 1 quality assurance manager) roles for a mean of 4 years (range 1-11 years). Commonly noted facilitators of high-quality stroke care were comprehensive stroke assessment and destination decision protocols, as well as bidirectional communication between EMS and hospital staff. Identified barriers included patient and bystander delays in calling 9-1-1, long transport distances to stroke centers, and limited EMS staffing. EMS professionals noted challenges interacting with nursing home staff and hospital clinicians during patient transfer. Interviewees also discussed the importance of educating the public about stroke signs and symptoms and community engagement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Within rural populations, EMS professionals determined that public education and community engagement are high-priority needs. Professionals also noted EMS' opportunities to enhance rural stroke care through consistent bidirectional communication and improved prehospital protocols. Future research is needed to further explore these themes in rural EMS agencies outside of North Carolina.</p>","PeriodicalId":20336,"journal":{"name":"Prehospital Emergency Care","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prehospital Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2025.2490180","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: For underserved rural communities with limited geographical access to comprehensive stroke centers, emergency medical services (EMS) play a crucial role in timely, high-quality acute stroke care. This qualitative study aimed to understand rural EMS perspectives on barriers and facilitators to optimal acute stroke care in rural communities.

Methods: Qualitative, individual semi-structured interviews were conducted with rural EMS professionals. Ten EMS agencies in North Carolina were contacted for participation in virtual 45-60 minute interviews and interested agency professionals self-selected into the study. Covered topics included stroke training and education; stroke care experience and expertise; clinical and sociodemographic patient characteristics; EMS workflows; and system- and patient-level interactions and outcomes. Recorded interviews were transcribed and then coded using an inductive and deductive, iterative approach by two independent reviewers in MAXQDA software. Facilitators and barriers to optimal acute stroke care were derived from thematic analysis.

Results: Twelve EMS professionals from 4 rural EMS agencies and 1 mixed urban-rural agency were interviewed. Participants worked in clinical (6 Paramedics, 1 EMT) and leadership (2 chiefs, 1 supervisor, 1 field training officer, 1 quality assurance manager) roles for a mean of 4 years (range 1-11 years). Commonly noted facilitators of high-quality stroke care were comprehensive stroke assessment and destination decision protocols, as well as bidirectional communication between EMS and hospital staff. Identified barriers included patient and bystander delays in calling 9-1-1, long transport distances to stroke centers, and limited EMS staffing. EMS professionals noted challenges interacting with nursing home staff and hospital clinicians during patient transfer. Interviewees also discussed the importance of educating the public about stroke signs and symptoms and community engagement.

Conclusions: Within rural populations, EMS professionals determined that public education and community engagement are high-priority needs. Professionals also noted EMS' opportunities to enhance rural stroke care through consistent bidirectional communication and improved prehospital protocols. Future research is needed to further explore these themes in rural EMS agencies outside of North Carolina.

农村急诊医疗服务对改善急性脑卒中护理的影响:一项定性研究。
目标:对于服务不足的农村社区,由于地理位置限制,无法到达综合中风中心,紧急医疗服务(EMS)在及时、高质量的急性中风护理中发挥着至关重要的作用。本定性研究旨在了解农村EMS对农村社区急性脑卒中最佳护理的障碍和促进因素。方法:对农村EMS专业人员进行定性、个人半结构化访谈。我们联系了北卡罗莱纳州的10家EMS机构,让他们参加45-60分钟的虚拟访谈,感兴趣的机构专业人员自行选择参加这项研究。涵盖的主题包括中风训练和教育;卒中护理经验和专业知识;患者的临床和社会人口学特征;EMS工作流;以及系统和患者层面的互动和结果。记录的访谈被转录,然后由两名独立的审稿人在MAXQDA软件中使用归纳和演绎迭代方法进行编码。最佳急性卒中护理的促进因素和障碍来自专题分析。结果:对4家农村医疗服务机构和1家城乡混合医疗服务机构的12名医疗服务专业人员进行了访谈。参与者在临床(6名护理人员,1名EMT)和领导(2名主管,1名主管,1名现场培训官,1名质量保证经理)角色中工作平均4年(范围为1-11年)。高质量脑卒中护理的常见促进因素是卒中综合评估和目的地决策协议,以及EMS和医院工作人员之间的双向沟通。确定的障碍包括患者和旁观者拨打911的延误,到中风中心的运输距离长,以及有限的EMS人员配备。EMS专业人员指出,在患者转移期间,与养老院工作人员和医院临床医生互动存在挑战。受访者还讨论了对公众进行中风体征和症状教育以及社区参与的重要性。结论:在农村人口中,EMS专业人员确定公共教育和社区参与是高度优先的需求。专业人士还指出,EMS有机会通过持续的双向沟通和改进院前协议来加强农村中风护理。未来的研究需要进一步探讨这些主题在农村EMS机构以外的北卡罗莱纳州。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Prehospital Emergency Care
Prehospital Emergency Care 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
137
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Prehospital Emergency Care publishes peer-reviewed information relevant to the practice, educational advancement, and investigation of prehospital emergency care, including the following types of articles: Special Contributions - Original Articles - Education and Practice - Preliminary Reports - Case Conferences - Position Papers - Collective Reviews - Editorials - Letters to the Editor - Media Reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信