Does Adding Thrombectomy-Capable Stroke Centers in a Regional Stroke Care System Affect Procedural Volume?

Abstract

Background: To maintain procedural proficiency and certification according to the standards set by The Joint Commission-which accredits health care centers in the United States-thrombectomy-capable stroke centers (TSCs) must achieve a minimum annual procedural volume. The addition of thrombectomy-capable centers in a regional stroke care system has the potential to increase access but also to decrease patient presentations and procedural volume at nearby centers. This study sought to characterize the impact of certifying additional thrombectomy-capable centers on procedural volume by center in a large, urban Emergency Medical Services (EMS) system.

Methods: Data were collected from each designated thrombectomy-capable center in Los Angeles (LA) County from January 1, 2018 through June 30, 2022, during which a net total of five thrombectomy-capable centers were newly designated in the County. Per center volume for ischemic stroke presentations, intravenous (IV) thrombolysis administrations (IV tissue plasminogen activator [tPA]), and thrombectomy were tabulated by six-month interval. Median last-known-well-to-procedure times by LA County Public Health service planning area (SPA) were calculated. The effect of the number of designated centers on procedural volumes per center and median last-known-well-to-procedure times were analyzed via a linear mixed effects model with a log link function.

Results: Procedural volume, ischemic stroke presentation volume, and last-known-well-to-procedure times had high variability over the time period studied. Nonetheless, the median values for each metric in this EMS system remained largely stable over the study period. There was no statistically significant association between the number of thrombectomy-capable centers and per center procedural volumes or times-to-procedure.

Conclusion: The designation of additional thrombectomy-capable centers in a regional stroke care system was not significantly associated with the volume of procedures by center or times-to-procedure, suggesting that additional centers may increase patient access to time-sensitive interventions without diluting patient presentations at existing centers.