{"title":"Timing of Advanced Airway Management in Witnessed Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.","authors":"Shunsuke Amagasa, Masahiro Kashiura, Hideto Yasuda, Yuki Kishihara, Satoko Uematsu","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the association between timing of advanced airway management (AAM) and outcomes in witnessed pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the OHCA registry in Japan. We included pediatric patients (<18 y) with OHCA who received AAM. We compared patients who received AAM at 1 to 10, 11 to 20, and 21 to 30 minutes after emergency medicine service (EMS) contact with the patient with those who had not yet received AAM but remained eligible to receive it at those times, respectively. The primary and secondary outcome measurements were survival and favorable neurological outcome at 1 month, respectively. To address resuscitation time bias, we performed risk-set matching analyses using time-dependent propensity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 269 patients were included. The numbers receiving AAM in each time period were 60 in the 1 to 10 minute period, 83 in the 11 to 20 minute period, and 84 in the 21 to 30 minute period. The association between patients who received AAM in each time period and survival was compared with patients who had not yet received AAM but remained eligible to receive it in that time period: 1 to 10 minutes [risk ratio (RR): 2.12 (95% CI: 0.61-7.33)], 11 to 20 minutes [RR: 3.03 (95% CI: 1.13-8.12)], and 21 to 30 minutes [RR: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.46-1.96)]. The association with favorable neurological outcomes: 1 to 10 minutes [RR: 2.47 (95% CI: 0.42-14.56)], 11 to 20 minutes [RR: 2.54 (95% CI: 0.63-10.23)], 21 to 30 minutes [RR: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.25-2.99)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In witnessed pediatric OHCA patients who went on to receive AAM, receiving this treatment in the time interval of 11 to 20 minutes was associated with survival, while earlier and later AAM times showed no association. Meanwhile, no association with favorable neurological outcomes was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To determine the association between timing of advanced airway management (AAM) and outcomes in witnessed pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the OHCA registry in Japan. We included pediatric patients (<18 y) with OHCA who received AAM. We compared patients who received AAM at 1 to 10, 11 to 20, and 21 to 30 minutes after emergency medicine service (EMS) contact with the patient with those who had not yet received AAM but remained eligible to receive it at those times, respectively. The primary and secondary outcome measurements were survival and favorable neurological outcome at 1 month, respectively. To address resuscitation time bias, we performed risk-set matching analyses using time-dependent propensity score.
Results: A total of 269 patients were included. The numbers receiving AAM in each time period were 60 in the 1 to 10 minute period, 83 in the 11 to 20 minute period, and 84 in the 21 to 30 minute period. The association between patients who received AAM in each time period and survival was compared with patients who had not yet received AAM but remained eligible to receive it in that time period: 1 to 10 minutes [risk ratio (RR): 2.12 (95% CI: 0.61-7.33)], 11 to 20 minutes [RR: 3.03 (95% CI: 1.13-8.12)], and 21 to 30 minutes [RR: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.46-1.96)]. The association with favorable neurological outcomes: 1 to 10 minutes [RR: 2.47 (95% CI: 0.42-14.56)], 11 to 20 minutes [RR: 2.54 (95% CI: 0.63-10.23)], 21 to 30 minutes [RR: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.25-2.99)].
Conclusion: In witnessed pediatric OHCA patients who went on to receive AAM, receiving this treatment in the time interval of 11 to 20 minutes was associated with survival, while earlier and later AAM times showed no association. Meanwhile, no association with favorable neurological outcomes was observed.
期刊介绍:
Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.