Timing of Advanced Airway Management in Witnessed Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Shunsuke Amagasa, Masahiro Kashiura, Hideto Yasuda, Yuki Kishihara, Satoko Uematsu
{"title":"Timing of Advanced Airway Management in Witnessed Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.","authors":"Shunsuke Amagasa, Masahiro Kashiura, Hideto Yasuda, Yuki Kishihara, Satoko Uematsu","doi":"10.1097/PEC.0000000000003412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the association between timing of advanced airway management (AAM) and outcomes in witnessed pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the OHCA registry in Japan. We included pediatric patients (<18 y) with OHCA who received AAM. We compared patients who received AAM at 1 to 10, 11 to 20, and 21 to 30 minutes after emergency medicine service (EMS) contact with the patient with those who had not yet received AAM but remained eligible to receive it at those times, respectively. The primary and secondary outcome measurements were survival and favorable neurological outcome at 1 month, respectively. To address resuscitation time bias, we performed risk-set matching analyses using time-dependent propensity score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 269 patients were included. The numbers receiving AAM in each time period were 60 in the 1 to 10 minute period, 83 in the 11 to 20 minute period, and 84 in the 21 to 30 minute period. The association between patients who received AAM in each time period and survival was compared with patients who had not yet received AAM but remained eligible to receive it in that time period: 1 to 10 minutes [risk ratio (RR): 2.12 (95% CI: 0.61-7.33)], 11 to 20 minutes [RR: 3.03 (95% CI: 1.13-8.12)], and 21 to 30 minutes [RR: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.46-1.96)]. The association with favorable neurological outcomes: 1 to 10 minutes [RR: 2.47 (95% CI: 0.42-14.56)], 11 to 20 minutes [RR: 2.54 (95% CI: 0.63-10.23)], 21 to 30 minutes [RR: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.25-2.99)].</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In witnessed pediatric OHCA patients who went on to receive AAM, receiving this treatment in the time interval of 11 to 20 minutes was associated with survival, while earlier and later AAM times showed no association. Meanwhile, no association with favorable neurological outcomes was observed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19996,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric emergency care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric emergency care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000003412","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the association between timing of advanced airway management (AAM) and outcomes in witnessed pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from the OHCA registry in Japan. We included pediatric patients (<18 y) with OHCA who received AAM. We compared patients who received AAM at 1 to 10, 11 to 20, and 21 to 30 minutes after emergency medicine service (EMS) contact with the patient with those who had not yet received AAM but remained eligible to receive it at those times, respectively. The primary and secondary outcome measurements were survival and favorable neurological outcome at 1 month, respectively. To address resuscitation time bias, we performed risk-set matching analyses using time-dependent propensity score.

Results: A total of 269 patients were included. The numbers receiving AAM in each time period were 60 in the 1 to 10 minute period, 83 in the 11 to 20 minute period, and 84 in the 21 to 30 minute period. The association between patients who received AAM in each time period and survival was compared with patients who had not yet received AAM but remained eligible to receive it in that time period: 1 to 10 minutes [risk ratio (RR): 2.12 (95% CI: 0.61-7.33)], 11 to 20 minutes [RR: 3.03 (95% CI: 1.13-8.12)], and 21 to 30 minutes [RR: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.46-1.96)]. The association with favorable neurological outcomes: 1 to 10 minutes [RR: 2.47 (95% CI: 0.42-14.56)], 11 to 20 minutes [RR: 2.54 (95% CI: 0.63-10.23)], 21 to 30 minutes [RR: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.25-2.99)].

Conclusion: In witnessed pediatric OHCA patients who went on to receive AAM, receiving this treatment in the time interval of 11 to 20 minutes was associated with survival, while earlier and later AAM times showed no association. Meanwhile, no association with favorable neurological outcomes was observed.

有证人的儿童院外心脏骤停的先进气道管理时机。
目的:探讨小儿院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的高级气道管理(AAM)时机与预后的关系。方法:我们使用日本OHCA登记处的数据进行了一项回顾性队列研究。我们纳入了儿科患者(结果:共纳入269例患者。每个时间段内接收AAM的人数在1 ~ 10分钟内为60人,在11 ~ 20分钟内为83人,在21 ~ 30分钟内为84人。在每个时间段接受AAM的患者与尚未接受AAM但仍有资格接受AAM的患者之间的相关性进行比较:1至10分钟[风险比(RR): 2.12 (95% CI: 0.61-7.33)], 11至20分钟[RR: 3.03 (95% CI: 1.13-8.12)], 21至30分钟[RR: 0.95 (95% CI: 0.46-1.96)]。与良好的神经预后相关:1至10分钟[RR: 2.47 (95% CI: 0.42-14.56)], 11至20分钟[RR: 2.54 (95% CI: 0.63-10.23)], 21至30分钟[RR: 0.86 (95% CI: 0.25-2.99)]。结论:在接受AAM治疗的儿童OHCA患者中,在11 ~ 20分钟的时间间隔内接受这种治疗与生存率相关,而早、晚AAM时间无相关性。同时,未观察到与有利的神经预后相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric emergency care
Pediatric emergency care 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
577
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Emergency Care®, features clinically relevant original articles with an EM perspective on the care of acutely ill or injured children and adolescents. The journal is aimed at both the pediatrician who wants to know more about treating and being compensated for minor emergency cases and the emergency physicians who must treat children or adolescents in more than one case in there.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信