Medical Physics 3.0 approach to optimizing image quality in a breast screening program.

Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-05-11 DOI:10.1002/mp.17878
Elizabeth Keavey, Paola Baldelli, Gillian Power, Niall Phelan
{"title":"Medical Physics 3.0 approach to optimizing image quality in a breast screening program.","authors":"Elizabeth Keavey, Paola Baldelli, Gillian Power, Niall Phelan","doi":"10.1002/mp.17878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography is linked to image quality (IQ) and should be optimized and consistent for all women screened. Optimization, typically based on equipment performance metrics from quality control tests, do not correlate directly with clinical performance.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The principles of Medical Physics 3.0 have been applied to combine medical physics Quality Control (QC) with screening clinical outcome to optimize the quality in a national breast screening program. Medical Physics 3.0 has been advocated as an initiative to enhance the practice of Medical Physics and leverage the value of medical physics to drive improved patient care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis of the cancer detection rate (CDR), of approximately 1.5 million screening examinations, was conducted within a screening program following the introduction of a new mammography system type. Significative differences in CDR (with nonoverlapping 95% confidence intervals [CI]) and performance metrics (lower [IQ] and mean glandular dose [MGD]) were observed between this new system type and the other system types in the screening program. The CDR for individual mammography system types was correlated with medical physics QC metrics of IQ and dosimetry. Preliminary investigations lead to an increase of the operational dose multiplier from 1.2 to 1.6 and the new setting was applied over all the new systems.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following optimization, the medical physics metrics revealed a 19% increase in MGD accompanied by a 12% improvement in IQ for the new system type. Meanwhile, a retrospective analysis of CDR showed overlapping 95% CI, indicating convergence between the two system types.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Applying Medical Physics 3.0 principles to aggregated screening and clinical outcome data in support of medical physics quality assurance processes has demonstrated potential to deliver optimization of quality for individual women and for the screened population.</p>","PeriodicalId":94136,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.17878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sensitivity and specificity of screening mammography is linked to image quality (IQ) and should be optimized and consistent for all women screened. Optimization, typically based on equipment performance metrics from quality control tests, do not correlate directly with clinical performance.

Purpose: The principles of Medical Physics 3.0 have been applied to combine medical physics Quality Control (QC) with screening clinical outcome to optimize the quality in a national breast screening program. Medical Physics 3.0 has been advocated as an initiative to enhance the practice of Medical Physics and leverage the value of medical physics to drive improved patient care.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of the cancer detection rate (CDR), of approximately 1.5 million screening examinations, was conducted within a screening program following the introduction of a new mammography system type. Significative differences in CDR (with nonoverlapping 95% confidence intervals [CI]) and performance metrics (lower [IQ] and mean glandular dose [MGD]) were observed between this new system type and the other system types in the screening program. The CDR for individual mammography system types was correlated with medical physics QC metrics of IQ and dosimetry. Preliminary investigations lead to an increase of the operational dose multiplier from 1.2 to 1.6 and the new setting was applied over all the new systems.

Results: Following optimization, the medical physics metrics revealed a 19% increase in MGD accompanied by a 12% improvement in IQ for the new system type. Meanwhile, a retrospective analysis of CDR showed overlapping 95% CI, indicating convergence between the two system types.

Conclusions: Applying Medical Physics 3.0 principles to aggregated screening and clinical outcome data in support of medical physics quality assurance processes has demonstrated potential to deliver optimization of quality for individual women and for the screened population.

医学物理3.0方法优化乳房筛查程序的图像质量。
背景:乳房x光筛查的敏感性和特异性与图像质量(IQ)有关,应该对所有接受筛查的女性进行优化和一致。优化通常基于来自质量控制测试的设备性能指标,与临床性能没有直接关联。目的:应用医学物理3.0原理,将医学物理质量控制(QC)与筛查临床结果相结合,优化国家乳腺筛查项目的质量。医学物理3.0是一项倡议,旨在加强医学物理的实践,并利用医学物理的价值来推动改善患者护理。方法:回顾性分析癌症检出率(CDR),约150万筛查检查,在一个新的乳房x光检查系统类型引入后的筛查项目中进行。在CDR(无重叠95%置信区间[CI])和性能指标(较低的[IQ]和平均腺剂量[MGD])方面,这种新系统类型与筛查计划中的其他系统类型之间存在显著差异。个体x光系统类型的CDR与医学物理QC指标IQ和剂量学相关。初步调查表明,工作剂量倍率从1.2增加到1.6,新设置适用于所有新系统。结果:优化后,医学物理指标显示,新系统类型的MGD增加了19%,智商提高了12%。同时,CDR的回顾性分析显示95% CI重叠,表明两种系统类型之间存在趋同。结论:将医学物理3.0原则应用于汇总筛查和临床结果数据,以支持医学物理质量保证流程,已证明有可能为女性个体和筛查人群提供质量优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信