Evaluation of a multidisciplinary simulation training curriculum for local anesthetic systemic toxicity management: a quasi-experimental study using the Kirkpatrick model in India.

IF 3.2
Anesthesia and pain medicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-08 DOI:10.17085/apm.24146
Pooja Bihani, Naveen Paliwal, Rishabh Jaju, Vikas Rajpurohit
{"title":"Evaluation of a multidisciplinary simulation training curriculum for local anesthetic systemic toxicity management: a quasi-experimental study using the Kirkpatrick model in India.","authors":"Pooja Bihani, Naveen Paliwal, Rishabh Jaju, Vikas Rajpurohit","doi":"10.17085/apm.24146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a rare life-threatening complication of regional anesthesia. Simulation-based training offers an effective educational approach to improve the management of infrequent events. This quasi-experimental study assessed the impact of a multidisciplinary simulation-based educational intervention on managing LAST as a real peri-operative team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve anesthesia trainees and eight nursing staff members participated in the study. The intervention included pre-course learning materials, cognitive aids, and immersive simulation scenarios. Simulation scenarios were conducted at baseline (O1), one week after a boot camp (O2), and six months later (O3). Participants' reactions to the training were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, while knowledge acquisition was measured through pre- and post-test questionnaires. Team-based skills acquisition and retention were assessed using a modified checklist from the simulation team assessment tool. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants rated the LAST curriculum as satisfactory to very satisfactory. Significant improvements in both technical and non-technical skills were observed post-intervention (O2), with checklist scores increasing from an average of 39 (4.2) (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.88; 43.11) at O1 to 83.5 (5.7) (95% CI, 77.91; 89.08) at O2 (mean difference, 44.5; P < 0.001). At six months (O3), skill retention was indicated by an average score of 72 (7.8) (95% CI, 62.36; 77.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary, simulation-based educational interventions remarkably improve knowledge and skills related to LAST management, with effective skill retention observed at six months when implemented by multiprofessional teams in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"20 2","pages":"166-174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.24146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a rare life-threatening complication of regional anesthesia. Simulation-based training offers an effective educational approach to improve the management of infrequent events. This quasi-experimental study assessed the impact of a multidisciplinary simulation-based educational intervention on managing LAST as a real peri-operative team.

Methods: Twelve anesthesia trainees and eight nursing staff members participated in the study. The intervention included pre-course learning materials, cognitive aids, and immersive simulation scenarios. Simulation scenarios were conducted at baseline (O1), one week after a boot camp (O2), and six months later (O3). Participants' reactions to the training were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, while knowledge acquisition was measured through pre- and post-test questionnaires. Team-based skills acquisition and retention were assessed using a modified checklist from the simulation team assessment tool. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: All participants rated the LAST curriculum as satisfactory to very satisfactory. Significant improvements in both technical and non-technical skills were observed post-intervention (O2), with checklist scores increasing from an average of 39 (4.2) (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.88; 43.11) at O1 to 83.5 (5.7) (95% CI, 77.91; 89.08) at O2 (mean difference, 44.5; P < 0.001). At six months (O3), skill retention was indicated by an average score of 72 (7.8) (95% CI, 62.36; 77.64).

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary, simulation-based educational interventions remarkably improve knowledge and skills related to LAST management, with effective skill retention observed at six months when implemented by multiprofessional teams in real-world settings.

评估局部麻醉系统毒性管理的多学科模拟培训课程:在印度使用Kirkpatrick模型的准实验研究。
背景:局麻全身毒性(LAST)是一种罕见的危及生命的区域麻醉并发症。基于模拟的培训提供了一种有效的教育方法来改善对罕见事件的管理。这项准实验研究评估了基于多学科模拟的教育干预对作为一个真正的围手术期团队管理LAST的影响。方法:12名麻醉培训生和8名护理人员参与研究。干预包括课前学习材料、认知辅助工具和沉浸式模拟场景。模拟场景分别在基线(O1)、训练营后一周(O2)和六个月后(O3)进行。参与者对培训的反应使用5分李克特量表进行评估,而知识获取则通过测试前和测试后问卷进行测量。基于团队的技能获取和保留使用来自模拟团队评估工具的修改清单进行评估。数据分析采用配对t检验,P < 0.05认为有统计学意义。结果:所有参与者对LAST课程的评价为满意至非常满意。干预后观察到技术和非技术技能的显着改善(O2),检查表得分从平均39分(4.2分)增加(95%置信区间[CI], 34.88;43.11)为0 ~ 83.5 (5.7)(95% CI, 77.91;89.08) O2组(平均差值44.5;P < 0.001)。在6个月时(3),技能保留的平均得分为72 (7.8)(95% CI, 62.36;77.64)。结论:多学科、基于模拟的教育干预措施显著提高了与LAST管理相关的知识和技能,在现实环境中由多专业团队实施时,在六个月后观察到有效的技能保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信