Evaluation of a multidisciplinary simulation training curriculum for local anesthetic systemic toxicity management: a quasi-experimental study using the Kirkpatrick model in India.
{"title":"Evaluation of a multidisciplinary simulation training curriculum for local anesthetic systemic toxicity management: a quasi-experimental study using the Kirkpatrick model in India.","authors":"Pooja Bihani, Naveen Paliwal, Rishabh Jaju, Vikas Rajpurohit","doi":"10.17085/apm.24146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a rare life-threatening complication of regional anesthesia. Simulation-based training offers an effective educational approach to improve the management of infrequent events. This quasi-experimental study assessed the impact of a multidisciplinary simulation-based educational intervention on managing LAST as a real peri-operative team.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve anesthesia trainees and eight nursing staff members participated in the study. The intervention included pre-course learning materials, cognitive aids, and immersive simulation scenarios. Simulation scenarios were conducted at baseline (O1), one week after a boot camp (O2), and six months later (O3). Participants' reactions to the training were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, while knowledge acquisition was measured through pre- and post-test questionnaires. Team-based skills acquisition and retention were assessed using a modified checklist from the simulation team assessment tool. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All participants rated the LAST curriculum as satisfactory to very satisfactory. Significant improvements in both technical and non-technical skills were observed post-intervention (O2), with checklist scores increasing from an average of 39 (4.2) (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.88; 43.11) at O1 to 83.5 (5.7) (95% CI, 77.91; 89.08) at O2 (mean difference, 44.5; P < 0.001). At six months (O3), skill retention was indicated by an average score of 72 (7.8) (95% CI, 62.36; 77.64).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multidisciplinary, simulation-based educational interventions remarkably improve knowledge and skills related to LAST management, with effective skill retention observed at six months when implemented by multiprofessional teams in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":101360,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","volume":"20 2","pages":"166-174"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12066202/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and pain medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17085/apm.24146","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a rare life-threatening complication of regional anesthesia. Simulation-based training offers an effective educational approach to improve the management of infrequent events. This quasi-experimental study assessed the impact of a multidisciplinary simulation-based educational intervention on managing LAST as a real peri-operative team.
Methods: Twelve anesthesia trainees and eight nursing staff members participated in the study. The intervention included pre-course learning materials, cognitive aids, and immersive simulation scenarios. Simulation scenarios were conducted at baseline (O1), one week after a boot camp (O2), and six months later (O3). Participants' reactions to the training were evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, while knowledge acquisition was measured through pre- and post-test questionnaires. Team-based skills acquisition and retention were assessed using a modified checklist from the simulation team assessment tool. Data were analyzed using paired t-tests, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.
Results: All participants rated the LAST curriculum as satisfactory to very satisfactory. Significant improvements in both technical and non-technical skills were observed post-intervention (O2), with checklist scores increasing from an average of 39 (4.2) (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.88; 43.11) at O1 to 83.5 (5.7) (95% CI, 77.91; 89.08) at O2 (mean difference, 44.5; P < 0.001). At six months (O3), skill retention was indicated by an average score of 72 (7.8) (95% CI, 62.36; 77.64).
Conclusions: Multidisciplinary, simulation-based educational interventions remarkably improve knowledge and skills related to LAST management, with effective skill retention observed at six months when implemented by multiprofessional teams in real-world settings.