Correlation between PD-L1 expression and FDG-PET/CT visual assessments in non-small cell lung cancer resected specimens.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Nuclear Medicine Communications Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-29 DOI:10.1097/MNM.0000000000001984
Miki Nishimori, Hitomi Iwasa, Kana Miyatake, Noriko Nitta, Kosuke Nakaji, Takayasu Izumi, Tomohiro Matsumoto, Rika Yoshimatsu, Tomoaki Yamanishi, Rikako Imai, Mahiru Kato, Hironobu Okada, Takuji Yamagami
{"title":"Correlation between PD-L1 expression and FDG-PET/CT visual assessments in non-small cell lung cancer resected specimens.","authors":"Miki Nishimori, Hitomi Iwasa, Kana Miyatake, Noriko Nitta, Kosuke Nakaji, Takayasu Izumi, Tomohiro Matsumoto, Rika Yoshimatsu, Tomoaki Yamanishi, Rikako Imai, Mahiru Kato, Hironobu Okada, Takuji Yamagami","doi":"10.1097/MNM.0000000000001984","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This retrospective study aimed to investigate the validity of fluorodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET) visual assessments to predict programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>One hundred and seven NSCLC patients who underwent FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) scans and PD-L1 expression tests were retrospectively identified. Patients were divided into two groups according to PD-L1 expression: PD-L1 high group (PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥50%) and PD-L1 low group (<50%). We compared clinicopathological characteristics and PET assessments [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and Deauville score] between the two groups based on PD-L1 expression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High expression of PD-L1 was detected in 25 of 107 cases. In both univariable and multivariable analysis, there were significant differences in PET visual assessments in NSCLC ( P  < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristics for the PET visual assessments [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.712, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.628-0.793] and SUVmax (AUC = 0.753, 95% CI 0.647-0.861) showed equivalent accuracy ( P  = 0.227). Based on histopathology, in adenocarcinoma patients, there were significant differences between PET visual assessments and PD-L1 expression ( P  < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in squamous cell carcinoma patients. Based on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation analysis, in patients with EGFR wild type, there were significant differences between PET visual assessments and PD-L1 expression ( P  = 0.006), while in patients with EGFR mutations, there were no significant differences between PET visual assessments and PD-L1 expression.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Results of PET visual assessments correlated with PD-L1 expression in NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":19708,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","volume":" ","pages":"636-642"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Medicine Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MNM.0000000000001984","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the validity of fluorodeoxyglucose PET (FDG-PET) visual assessments to predict programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression levels in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and methods: One hundred and seven NSCLC patients who underwent FDG-PET/computed tomography (CT) scans and PD-L1 expression tests were retrospectively identified. Patients were divided into two groups according to PD-L1 expression: PD-L1 high group (PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥50%) and PD-L1 low group (<50%). We compared clinicopathological characteristics and PET assessments [maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and Deauville score] between the two groups based on PD-L1 expression.

Results: High expression of PD-L1 was detected in 25 of 107 cases. In both univariable and multivariable analysis, there were significant differences in PET visual assessments in NSCLC ( P  < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristics for the PET visual assessments [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.712, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.628-0.793] and SUVmax (AUC = 0.753, 95% CI 0.647-0.861) showed equivalent accuracy ( P  = 0.227). Based on histopathology, in adenocarcinoma patients, there were significant differences between PET visual assessments and PD-L1 expression ( P  < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in squamous cell carcinoma patients. Based on epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation analysis, in patients with EGFR wild type, there were significant differences between PET visual assessments and PD-L1 expression ( P  = 0.006), while in patients with EGFR mutations, there were no significant differences between PET visual assessments and PD-L1 expression.

Conclusion: Results of PET visual assessments correlated with PD-L1 expression in NSCLC.

非小细胞肺癌切除标本中PD-L1表达与FDG-PET/CT视觉评价的相关性
目的:本回顾性研究旨在探讨氟脱氧葡萄糖PET (FDG-PET)视觉评估在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中预测程序性死亡配体1 (PD-L1)表达水平的有效性。材料和方法:回顾性分析167例接受FDG-PET/ CT扫描和PD-L1表达检测的非小细胞肺癌患者。根据PD-L1表达情况将患者分为两组:PD-L1高表达组(PD-L1肿瘤比例评分≥50%)和PD-L1低表达组(结果:107例患者中有25例PD-L1高表达。在单变量和多变量分析中,PET视觉评价在NSCLC中的差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。PET视觉评估的受试者工作特征[曲线下面积(AUC) = 0.712, 95%可信区间(CI) 0.628-0.793]和SUVmax (AUC = 0.753, 95% CI 0.647-0.861)具有相同的准确性(P = 0.227)。基于组织病理学,在腺癌患者中,PET视觉评价与PD-L1表达差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05),而在鳞状细胞癌患者中差异无统计学意义。基于表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变分析,在EGFR野生型患者中,PET视觉评估与PD-L1表达差异有统计学意义(P = 0.006),而在EGFR突变患者中,PET视觉评估与PD-L1表达差异无统计学意义。结论:PET视觉评价结果与非小细胞肺癌中PD-L1表达相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
212
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nuclear Medicine Communications, the official journal of the British Nuclear Medicine Society, is a rapid communications journal covering nuclear medicine and molecular imaging with radionuclides, and the basic supporting sciences. As well as clinical research and commentary, manuscripts describing research on preclinical and basic sciences (radiochemistry, radiopharmacy, radiobiology, radiopharmacology, medical physics, computing and engineering, and technical and nursing professions involved in delivering nuclear medicine services) are welcomed, as the journal is intended to be of interest internationally to all members of the many medical and non-medical disciplines involved in nuclear medicine. In addition to papers reporting original studies, frankly written editorials and topical reviews are a regular feature of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信