Comparison of MRI imaging features to differentiate degenerating fibroids from uterine leiomyosarcomas.

IF 0.9 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Rare Tumors Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20363613251327080
William W Loughborough, Andrea G Rockall, Tanja T Gagliardi, Laura Satchwell, Emily Greenlay, Piers Osborne, Nishat Bharwani, Thomas Ind, Ayoma Attygalle, Dione Lother, Georgina Hopkinson, Robin Jones, Charlotte Benson, Aisha Miah, Aslam Sohaib, Christina Messiou
{"title":"Comparison of MRI imaging features to differentiate degenerating fibroids from uterine leiomyosarcomas.","authors":"William W Loughborough, Andrea G Rockall, Tanja T Gagliardi, Laura Satchwell, Emily Greenlay, Piers Osborne, Nishat Bharwani, Thomas Ind, Ayoma Attygalle, Dione Lother, Georgina Hopkinson, Robin Jones, Charlotte Benson, Aisha Miah, Aslam Sohaib, Christina Messiou","doi":"10.1177/20363613251327080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> The aim of this study was to construct a diagnostic model from MRI features to distinguish complex leiomyomas/degenerating fibroids (DF) from leiomyosarcoma (LMS). <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective case-controlled study was performed comparing MRI features of patients with pathologically proven DF or LMS. MRI in 42 patients with DF (control group) and 46 with LMS (study group) was used to generate a diagnostic model. Imaging features reported in the literature to distinguish these two entities were scored for each uterine mass by two radiologists unaware of the histological diagnosis. Inter observer variation and univariate analysis was undertaken. Imaging characteristics identified on univariate analysis were used to build a multi-variable diagnostic model and sensitivity and specificity of this model calculated. <b>Results:</b> Taking the features identified on the univariate analysis, the final diagnostic model was based on AP length (<i>p</i> = .053), intermediate T2 signal (IT2), volume (<i>p</i> = .002), and nodular border (<i>p</i> = .001). When the model was implemented back into the training dataset it demonstrated a sensitivity of 70.7%, and a specificity of 76.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of radiologist suspicion score was 74.7% and 70.4%. In addition, morphological features showed only poor or moderate inter observer agreement at best. <b>Conclusions:</b> Morphological MRI imaging features alone are not sufficient to obviate the need for pathological confirmation prior to non-surgical management of complex uterine mass lesions. <b>Trial registration:</b> IRAS project ID 251778 Protocol number: CCR 4992 REC reference 19/YH/0134 Date of HRA approval: 29.4.19.</p>","PeriodicalId":46078,"journal":{"name":"Rare Tumors","volume":"17 ","pages":"20363613251327080"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033571/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rare Tumors","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20363613251327080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to construct a diagnostic model from MRI features to distinguish complex leiomyomas/degenerating fibroids (DF) from leiomyosarcoma (LMS). Methods: A retrospective case-controlled study was performed comparing MRI features of patients with pathologically proven DF or LMS. MRI in 42 patients with DF (control group) and 46 with LMS (study group) was used to generate a diagnostic model. Imaging features reported in the literature to distinguish these two entities were scored for each uterine mass by two radiologists unaware of the histological diagnosis. Inter observer variation and univariate analysis was undertaken. Imaging characteristics identified on univariate analysis were used to build a multi-variable diagnostic model and sensitivity and specificity of this model calculated. Results: Taking the features identified on the univariate analysis, the final diagnostic model was based on AP length (p = .053), intermediate T2 signal (IT2), volume (p = .002), and nodular border (p = .001). When the model was implemented back into the training dataset it demonstrated a sensitivity of 70.7%, and a specificity of 76.2%. The sensitivity and specificity of radiologist suspicion score was 74.7% and 70.4%. In addition, morphological features showed only poor or moderate inter observer agreement at best. Conclusions: Morphological MRI imaging features alone are not sufficient to obviate the need for pathological confirmation prior to non-surgical management of complex uterine mass lesions. Trial registration: IRAS project ID 251778 Protocol number: CCR 4992 REC reference 19/YH/0134 Date of HRA approval: 29.4.19.

退行性肌瘤与子宫平滑肌肉瘤的MRI影像特征比较。
目的:本研究的目的是建立一个从MRI特征来区分复杂平滑肌瘤/变性肌瘤(DF)和平滑肌肉瘤(LMS)的诊断模型。方法:回顾性病例对照研究,比较病理证实的DF或LMS患者的MRI特征。选取42例DF患者(对照组)和46例LMS患者(研究组)的MRI数据建立诊断模型。两名不知道组织学诊断的放射科医生对每个子宫肿块的影像学特征进行评分,以区分这两种实体。进行了观察者间变异和单变量分析。利用单变量分析确定的影像学特征建立多变量诊断模型,并计算该模型的敏感性和特异性。结果:根据单因素分析确定的特征,最终的诊断模型基于AP长度(p = 0.053)、中间T2信号(IT2)、体积(p = 0.002)和结节边界(p = 0.001)。当该模型被执行回训练数据集时,它的灵敏度为70.7%,特异性为76.2%。放射科医生怀疑评分的敏感性为74.7%,特异性为70.4%。此外,形态学特征在观察者之间最多只能显示出较差或中等程度的一致性。结论:单纯的形态学MRI影像特征不足以避免在非手术治疗复杂子宫肿块病变前进行病理确认。试验注册:IRAS项目ID 251778协议号:CCR 4992 REC参考文献19/YH/0134 HRA批准日期:29.4.19。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rare Tumors
Rare Tumors ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信