Bacteria and yeasts of nosocomial importance in a radiology department in an academic hospital.

IF 1.4 Q4 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2025-04-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4102/sajid.v40i1.703
Rodger P Osmond, Susan Lucas, Rispah N Chomba
{"title":"Bacteria and yeasts of nosocomial importance in a radiology department in an academic hospital.","authors":"Rodger P Osmond, Susan Lucas, Rispah N Chomba","doi":"10.4102/sajid.v40i1.703","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) result in a significant burden on the healthcare sector. Investigations into their epidemiology and possible routes of transmission are important to enable interventions that protect patients and staff. Radiology devices are known to be colonised by microbial organisms that may act as fomites for infection. However, there is a lack of relevant data from the South African setting.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study aimed to determine deficiencies in infection control practices and the microbial colonisation rates and resistance profiles of devices within a radiology department.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A cross-sectional, single-centre study was conducted in a radiology department in Johannesburg, South Africa. An infection prevention and control (IPC) audit was performed, and 143 swabs were collected. Swabs were cultured according to standard microbiological techniques, and focused antimicrobial resistance testing was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Infection prevention and control practices did not align with manufacturer recommendations. A total of 29 positive swabs were obtained (20.3%). Of these, 93.1% (<i>n</i> = 27) were considered commensals, while 6.9% (<i>n</i> = 2) were considered pathogens. No significant antimicrobial resistance mechanisms were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The detection of pathogenic organisms demonstrates the possibility of microbial transmission between patients within the department. Infection control practices are noncompliant and require improvement to mitigate this risk. The threat of microbial dissemination remains.</p><p><strong>Contribution: </strong>This study demonstrates the prevalence of microbes in a South African radiology department, underscoring the risk of microbial dissemination because of inadequate decontamination practices between patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":44007,"journal":{"name":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","volume":"40 1","pages":"703"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067601/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern African Journal of Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajid.v40i1.703","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) result in a significant burden on the healthcare sector. Investigations into their epidemiology and possible routes of transmission are important to enable interventions that protect patients and staff. Radiology devices are known to be colonised by microbial organisms that may act as fomites for infection. However, there is a lack of relevant data from the South African setting.

Objectives: The study aimed to determine deficiencies in infection control practices and the microbial colonisation rates and resistance profiles of devices within a radiology department.

Method: A cross-sectional, single-centre study was conducted in a radiology department in Johannesburg, South Africa. An infection prevention and control (IPC) audit was performed, and 143 swabs were collected. Swabs were cultured according to standard microbiological techniques, and focused antimicrobial resistance testing was performed.

Results: Infection prevention and control practices did not align with manufacturer recommendations. A total of 29 positive swabs were obtained (20.3%). Of these, 93.1% (n = 27) were considered commensals, while 6.9% (n = 2) were considered pathogens. No significant antimicrobial resistance mechanisms were detected.

Conclusion: The detection of pathogenic organisms demonstrates the possibility of microbial transmission between patients within the department. Infection control practices are noncompliant and require improvement to mitigate this risk. The threat of microbial dissemination remains.

Contribution: This study demonstrates the prevalence of microbes in a South African radiology department, underscoring the risk of microbial dissemination because of inadequate decontamination practices between patients.

学术医院放射科细菌和酵母菌的院内重要性。
背景:医疗保健相关感染(HAIs)给医疗保健部门带来了沉重的负担。调查其流行病学和可能的传播途径对于采取保护患者和工作人员的干预措施至关重要。已知放射设备被微生物定植,这些微生物可能作为感染的污染物。然而,缺乏来自南非环境的相关数据。目的:该研究旨在确定感染控制实践的缺陷,以及放射科设备的微生物定植率和耐药概况。方法:在南非约翰内斯堡的放射科进行了一项横断面单中心研究。进行了感染预防和控制(IPC)审核,收集了143份拭子。按标准微生物学技术培养拭子,进行重点耐药检测。结果:感染预防和控制措施不符合制造商的建议。共获得阳性拭子29例(20.3%)。其中,93.1% (n = 27)被认为是共生菌,6.9% (n = 2)被认为是病原体。未发现明显的耐药机制。结论:病原菌的检出提示科室内患者之间存在微生物传播的可能性。感染控制措施不合规,需要改进以减轻这种风险。微生物传播的威胁仍然存在。贡献:本研究展示了微生物在南非放射科的流行,强调了微生物传播的风险,因为患者之间不充分的去污实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
11.10%
发文量
50
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信