Feasibility and tolerability of physiologic monitoring among pregnant nurses and nursing teams.

IF 1.5 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Isha Agarwal, Madeleine Puissant, Irit Altman, Alexandra Hinton, Tania D Strout, Erika L Sabbath
{"title":"Feasibility and tolerability of physiologic monitoring among pregnant nurses and nursing teams.","authors":"Isha Agarwal, Madeleine Puissant, Irit Altman, Alexandra Hinton, Tania D Strout, Erika L Sabbath","doi":"10.1186/s40814-025-01647-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most studies of stress during pregnancy have relied on self-reported and recalled measures, leaving a knowledge gap about the impact of acute, or momentary, stressors. Heart rate, blood pressure, and cortisol are physiologic measures known to increase acutely in response to acute stress. The feasibility of collecting these measures has not been widely reported among pregnant workers outside of a controlled laboratory setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This pilot study assessed the feasibility and tolerability of measuring ambulatory heart rate, blood pressure, and diurnal urine cortisol during periods of work and rest among pregnant nurses, nursing assistants, and clinical technicians.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over a 9-month enrollment period, we received 31 inquiries from potential candidates, of whom 18 met our eligibility criteria and 12 accepted enrollment (67% acceptance rate). Over the study period, 4 enrollees withdrew their participation, and 8 were retained until the end of the study (67% completion rate). Our feasibility threshold was the acquisition of ≥ 80% of expected measurements for heart rate, blood pressure, and urine cortisol among retained participants. We achieved our feasibility target for blood pressure recordings (acquiring 84% of expected measures) but not for heart rate recordings (acquiring 60% of expected measures). Urine cortisol levels were successfully obtained 97% of the time. Through qualitative analysis of comments provided by study participants, we identified three major themes surrounding barriers to completing physiological monitoring: (1) personal discomfort and technical issues with study equipment, (2) work or activity interference, and (3) concerns about study design.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While physiologic monitoring of pregnant workers is important for learning about how work might impact pregnancy outcomes, equipment challenges pose a significant barrier to study participation. Future studies should allow for a significant withdrawal rate or explore alternative equipment options.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12034121/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01647-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most studies of stress during pregnancy have relied on self-reported and recalled measures, leaving a knowledge gap about the impact of acute, or momentary, stressors. Heart rate, blood pressure, and cortisol are physiologic measures known to increase acutely in response to acute stress. The feasibility of collecting these measures has not been widely reported among pregnant workers outside of a controlled laboratory setting.

Methods: This pilot study assessed the feasibility and tolerability of measuring ambulatory heart rate, blood pressure, and diurnal urine cortisol during periods of work and rest among pregnant nurses, nursing assistants, and clinical technicians.

Results: Over a 9-month enrollment period, we received 31 inquiries from potential candidates, of whom 18 met our eligibility criteria and 12 accepted enrollment (67% acceptance rate). Over the study period, 4 enrollees withdrew their participation, and 8 were retained until the end of the study (67% completion rate). Our feasibility threshold was the acquisition of ≥ 80% of expected measurements for heart rate, blood pressure, and urine cortisol among retained participants. We achieved our feasibility target for blood pressure recordings (acquiring 84% of expected measures) but not for heart rate recordings (acquiring 60% of expected measures). Urine cortisol levels were successfully obtained 97% of the time. Through qualitative analysis of comments provided by study participants, we identified three major themes surrounding barriers to completing physiological monitoring: (1) personal discomfort and technical issues with study equipment, (2) work or activity interference, and (3) concerns about study design.

Conclusions: While physiologic monitoring of pregnant workers is important for learning about how work might impact pregnancy outcomes, equipment challenges pose a significant barrier to study participation. Future studies should allow for a significant withdrawal rate or explore alternative equipment options.

孕妇护士及护理团队进行生理监测的可行性及耐受性。
背景:大多数关于怀孕期间压力的研究都依赖于自我报告和回忆措施,留下了一个关于急性或瞬时压力源影响的知识空白。心率、血压和皮质醇是已知的生理指标,在急性压力下会急剧增加。收集这些措施的可行性尚未广泛报道在受控实验室环境之外的怀孕工人。方法:本初步研究评估了孕妇护士、护理助理和临床技术人员在工作和休息期间测量动态心率、血压和尿皮质醇的可行性和耐受性。结果:在9个月的入组期间,我们收到31份潜在候选人的咨询,其中18名符合我们的资格标准,12名接受入组(录取率67%)。在研究期间,4名受试者退出研究,8名受试者保留至研究结束(完成率67%)。我们的可行性阈值是在保留的参与者中获得≥80%的预期心率、血压和尿皮质醇测量值。我们实现了血压记录的可行性目标(获得预期测量的84%),但没有实现心率记录的可行性目标(获得预期测量的60%)。尿液皮质醇水平在97%的情况下成功获得。通过对研究参与者提供的意见进行定性分析,我们确定了围绕完成生理监测障碍的三个主要主题:(1)个人不适和研究设备的技术问题,(2)工作或活动干扰,以及(3)对研究设计的担忧。结论:虽然对怀孕女工进行生理监测对于了解工作如何影响妊娠结局很重要,但设备方面的挑战对参与研究构成了重大障碍。未来的研究应考虑到显著的撤离率或探索其他设备选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信