Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenia Management: An Audit of Practice in a UK Cancer Center

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Matthew Fowler , Andrea Nagy , James Donaldson , Julie Thompson , AnnMarie Walton , Mary Affronti
{"title":"Low-Risk Febrile Neutropenia Management: An Audit of Practice in a UK Cancer Center","authors":"Matthew Fowler ,&nbsp;Andrea Nagy ,&nbsp;James Donaldson ,&nbsp;Julie Thompson ,&nbsp;AnnMarie Walton ,&nbsp;Mary Affronti","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a known complication of chemotherapy. Guidelines from American Society of Clinical Oncology and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence support outpatient management for low-risk FN patients; however, implementation varies across United Kingdom (UK) cancer centers. While some centers have adopted outpatient pathways, others continue to rely on inpatient care, leading to inequities in FN management. Standardized use of risk stratification tools, such as the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) scores, is essential for equitable FN management. Globally, oncology nurses play a critical role in optimizing FN care to reduce hospital admissions in low-risk patients.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This retrospective study aimed to determine the proportion of FN patients classified as low risk using the MASCC and CISNE scores, evaluate their clinical outcomes, and assess the feasibility of outpatient management.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective audit of adult patients with solid tumors admitted with FN was conducted at a UK NHS cancer center over a 6-month period. Data on MASCC/CISNE scores, clinical outcomes, length of stay, and antibiotic use were extracted from electronic records. Statistical analyses, including Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> and Kruskal–Wallis tests, were performed. A cost analysis estimated potential financial savings from outpatient management.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Of 18 FN admissions, 11 (61.1%) were classified as low risk by MASCC, and 6 (54.5%) of these were also low risk by CISNE. No adverse events were observed. The median length of stay was shorter for MASCC low-risk patients <em>v</em> high-risk patients (6 <em>v</em> 8 days, <em>P</em> = .043). Estimated cost savings were approximately £30,000 over 6 months. Some UK centers have successfully implemented outpatient FN pathways, but variation in risk stratification and systemic inequities exist.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Oncology nurses are key to standardizing FN risk assessment and advocating for equitable outpatient FN care. Addressing disparities in low-risk FN management may optimize healthcare resources and improve patient experience.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":"41 3","pages":"Article 151892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208125000853","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Febrile neutropenia (FN) is a known complication of chemotherapy. Guidelines from American Society of Clinical Oncology and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence support outpatient management for low-risk FN patients; however, implementation varies across United Kingdom (UK) cancer centers. While some centers have adopted outpatient pathways, others continue to rely on inpatient care, leading to inequities in FN management. Standardized use of risk stratification tools, such as the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) scores, is essential for equitable FN management. Globally, oncology nurses play a critical role in optimizing FN care to reduce hospital admissions in low-risk patients.

Objectives

This retrospective study aimed to determine the proportion of FN patients classified as low risk using the MASCC and CISNE scores, evaluate their clinical outcomes, and assess the feasibility of outpatient management.

Methods

A retrospective audit of adult patients with solid tumors admitted with FN was conducted at a UK NHS cancer center over a 6-month period. Data on MASCC/CISNE scores, clinical outcomes, length of stay, and antibiotic use were extracted from electronic records. Statistical analyses, including Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis tests, were performed. A cost analysis estimated potential financial savings from outpatient management.

Results

Of 18 FN admissions, 11 (61.1%) were classified as low risk by MASCC, and 6 (54.5%) of these were also low risk by CISNE. No adverse events were observed. The median length of stay was shorter for MASCC low-risk patients v high-risk patients (6 v 8 days, P = .043). Estimated cost savings were approximately £30,000 over 6 months. Some UK centers have successfully implemented outpatient FN pathways, but variation in risk stratification and systemic inequities exist.

Conclusions

Oncology nurses are key to standardizing FN risk assessment and advocating for equitable outpatient FN care. Addressing disparities in low-risk FN management may optimize healthcare resources and improve patient experience.
低风险发热性中性粒细胞减少症管理:英国癌症中心的审计实践。
背景:发热性中性粒细胞减少症(FN)是已知的化疗并发症。美国临床肿瘤学会和国家健康与护理卓越研究所的指南支持低风险FN患者的门诊管理;然而,英国各癌症中心的实施情况各不相同。虽然一些中心采用门诊途径,但其他中心继续依赖住院治疗,导致FN管理的不公平。标准化使用风险分层工具,如多国癌症支持治疗协会(MASCC)和稳定发热性中性粒细胞减少临床指数(CISNE)评分,对于公平的FN管理至关重要。在全球范围内,肿瘤护士在优化FN护理以减少低风险患者住院方面发挥着关键作用。目的:本回顾性研究旨在确定使用MASCC和CISNE评分归为低风险的FN患者的比例,评估其临床结果,并评估门诊管理的可行性。方法:对在英国NHS癌症中心接受FN治疗的成年实体肿瘤患者进行了为期6个月的回顾性审计。从电子记录中提取MASCC/CISNE评分、临床结果、住院时间和抗生素使用的数据。进行统计分析,包括Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis检验。一项成本分析估计了门诊管理可能节省的资金。结果:在18例FN患者中,11例(61.1%)被MASCC分类为低风险,其中6例(54.5%)被CISNE分类为低风险。未观察到不良事件。MASCC低危患者的中位住院时间短于高危患者(6天vs 8天,P = .043)。估计在6个月内节省的费用约为30,000英镑。一些英国中心已经成功地实施了门诊FN途径,但存在风险分层和系统性不平等的差异。结论:肿瘤科护士是规范FN风险评估和倡导公平门诊FN护理的关键。解决低风险FN管理方面的差异可以优化医疗资源并改善患者体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seminars in Oncology Nursing
Seminars in Oncology Nursing Nursing-Oncology (nursing)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信