Budget Impact of Shifting the Treatment Setting of Unresectable Liver Metastases Associated with Primary Colorectal Cancer Using Y-90 Resin Microspheres from the Outpatient Hospital to the Office-Based Laboratory.

IF 2.1 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research Pub Date : 2025-05-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/CEOR.S492369
David C Sperling, Katrine Wallace, Nanette von Oppen, Joshua L Weintraub
{"title":"Budget Impact of Shifting the Treatment Setting of Unresectable Liver Metastases Associated with Primary Colorectal Cancer Using Y-90 Resin Microspheres from the Outpatient Hospital to the Office-Based Laboratory.","authors":"David C Sperling, Katrine Wallace, Nanette von Oppen, Joshua L Weintraub","doi":"10.2147/CEOR.S492369","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>In the wake of ever-increasing health care costs, solutions are sought to make health care more affordable, such as moving hospital outpatient procedures to office-based laboratory (OBL) settings. A budget impact model was constructed to estimate the health plan cost benefit of moving 50% of yttrium-90 resin microspheres (Y-90) selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) procedures for unresectable liver metastases associated with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) from a traditional hospital outpatient setting (HOPPS) to an OBL setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The eligible population was estimated using an incidence-based approach for a hypothetical health plan with 1 million covered lives. Modeled costs were based on 2024 Medicare reimbursement rates. Three treatment scenarios were considered: 1) base case HOPPS, 2) hybrid (HOPPS/OBL), and 3) OBL settings. Budget impacts were estimated as the differences in annual total cost of treatment after switching 50% of Y-90 SIRTs from HOPPS to the hybrid (HOPPS/OBL) or OBL setting. Per-member-per-month (PMPM) budget impacts were also calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying the proportions of patients shifting settings and the treatment setting they were shifting into.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Annually, 28 patients were estimated to have metastatic CRC and unresectable liver metastases in a health plan of 1 million members. Average estimated per-patient cost savings would be $8,791 by switching one patient to a hybrid setting and $17,697 for a patient switched to the OBL. Switching 50% of eligible procedures resulted in PMPM cost benefits to the plan of $0.0102 for hybrid setting and $0.0206 for OBL. In sensitivity analyses, annual cost savings for the health plan were affected by both the proportion of patients shifted and the setting they were shifted into.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Shifting a percentage of the treatment of unresectable liver metastases with Y-90 SIRT to the OBL setting results in modest cost benefits for US health plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":47313,"journal":{"name":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","volume":"17 ","pages":"387-392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068280/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S492369","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: In the wake of ever-increasing health care costs, solutions are sought to make health care more affordable, such as moving hospital outpatient procedures to office-based laboratory (OBL) settings. A budget impact model was constructed to estimate the health plan cost benefit of moving 50% of yttrium-90 resin microspheres (Y-90) selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) procedures for unresectable liver metastases associated with primary colorectal cancer (CRC) from a traditional hospital outpatient setting (HOPPS) to an OBL setting.

Methods: The eligible population was estimated using an incidence-based approach for a hypothetical health plan with 1 million covered lives. Modeled costs were based on 2024 Medicare reimbursement rates. Three treatment scenarios were considered: 1) base case HOPPS, 2) hybrid (HOPPS/OBL), and 3) OBL settings. Budget impacts were estimated as the differences in annual total cost of treatment after switching 50% of Y-90 SIRTs from HOPPS to the hybrid (HOPPS/OBL) or OBL setting. Per-member-per-month (PMPM) budget impacts were also calculated. Sensitivity analyses were conducted by varying the proportions of patients shifting settings and the treatment setting they were shifting into.

Results: Annually, 28 patients were estimated to have metastatic CRC and unresectable liver metastases in a health plan of 1 million members. Average estimated per-patient cost savings would be $8,791 by switching one patient to a hybrid setting and $17,697 for a patient switched to the OBL. Switching 50% of eligible procedures resulted in PMPM cost benefits to the plan of $0.0102 for hybrid setting and $0.0206 for OBL. In sensitivity analyses, annual cost savings for the health plan were affected by both the proportion of patients shifted and the setting they were shifted into.

Conclusion: Shifting a percentage of the treatment of unresectable liver metastases with Y-90 SIRT to the OBL setting results in modest cost benefits for US health plans.

使用Y-90树脂微球治疗原发性结直肠癌不可切除肝转移患者的治疗环境从门诊医院转移到办公室实验室的预算影响
目的:随着医疗保健成本的不断增加,寻求解决方案使医疗保健更实惠,例如将医院门诊程序转移到基于办公室的实验室(OBL)设置。构建了一个预算影响模型,以评估将50%的钇-90树脂微球(Y-90)选择性内放射治疗(SIRT)程序从传统医院门诊(HOPPS)转移到OBL设置的健康计划成本效益。方法:使用基于发病率的方法对假设的健康计划进行估计,该计划涵盖100万人的生命。模型成本基于2024年医疗保险报销率。考虑了三种治疗方案:1)基本情况HOPPS, 2)混合(HOPPS/OBL)和3)OBL设置。预算影响估计为将50%的Y-90 sirt从HOPPS切换到混合(HOPPS/OBL)或OBL设置后的年总治疗成本差异。还计算了每个成员每月(PMPM)的预算影响。敏感性分析是通过改变患者转移环境和他们转移到治疗环境的比例来进行的。结果:每年,估计有28例患者转移性结直肠癌和不可切除的肝转移在100万成员的健康计划。通过将一名患者转换为混合设置,平均估计每位患者的成本将节省8,791美元,而将一名患者转换为OBL将节省17,697美元。将50%的符合条件的程序转换为混合设置的成本效益为0.0102美元,OBL的成本为0.0206美元。在敏感性分析中,健康计划的年度成本节约受到转移患者比例和转移患者所在环境的影响。结论:将Y-90 SIRT治疗不可切除肝转移的百分比转移到OBL设置,对美国健康计划产生适度的成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
83
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信