Proximal femoral replacement with locking plate for massive bone loss: a case report.

IF 1.8 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
SICOT-J Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-12 DOI:10.1051/sicotj/2025024
Hironori Ochi, Tomonori Baba, Masahiko Nozawa, Suguru Kato, Kyoko Sasaki, Yuko Sakamoto, Sung-Gon Kim, Muneaki Ishijima
{"title":"Proximal femoral replacement with locking plate for massive bone loss: a case report.","authors":"Hironori Ochi, Tomonori Baba, Masahiko Nozawa, Suguru Kato, Kyoko Sasaki, Yuko Sakamoto, Sung-Gon Kim, Muneaki Ishijima","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2025024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Complications on the femoral side after performing proximal femoral replacement (PFR), such as stem loosening and periprosthetic fractures, are the major reasons for reoperation. Femoral reconstruction was performed using PFR with a locking plate to minimize the risk of complications. We present the case of an 85-year-old woman with stem loosening and massive proximal femoral bone loss (Paprosky type IV) 10 years after stem revision in bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Femoral reconstruction was performed using the following surgical techniques. After removing the previous implant, a PFR was inserted into the host bone of the distal femur and fixed at the junction with cement. In addition, a locking plate was used for bridging. Full weight-bearing rehabilitation was started the day after surgery. At the 5-year follow-up, the patient could walk steadily without complications. A postoperative radiograph of the femur showed no signs of a radiolucent line, implant-related issues, or bone resorption. This reconstructive technique may reduce the high torsional and compressive stresses on bone cement prostheses, which can cause complications on the femoral side. Even in the case of poor femoral host bone quality, this reconstruction method can achieve robust femoral reconstruction. Femorl reconstruction using PFR with a locking plate is a particularly beneficial reconstruction method for older patients with massive proximal femoral bone loss.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"11 ","pages":"29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12068785/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2025024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Complications on the femoral side after performing proximal femoral replacement (PFR), such as stem loosening and periprosthetic fractures, are the major reasons for reoperation. Femoral reconstruction was performed using PFR with a locking plate to minimize the risk of complications. We present the case of an 85-year-old woman with stem loosening and massive proximal femoral bone loss (Paprosky type IV) 10 years after stem revision in bipolar hemiarthroplasty. Femoral reconstruction was performed using the following surgical techniques. After removing the previous implant, a PFR was inserted into the host bone of the distal femur and fixed at the junction with cement. In addition, a locking plate was used for bridging. Full weight-bearing rehabilitation was started the day after surgery. At the 5-year follow-up, the patient could walk steadily without complications. A postoperative radiograph of the femur showed no signs of a radiolucent line, implant-related issues, or bone resorption. This reconstructive technique may reduce the high torsional and compressive stresses on bone cement prostheses, which can cause complications on the femoral side. Even in the case of poor femoral host bone quality, this reconstruction method can achieve robust femoral reconstruction. Femorl reconstruction using PFR with a locking plate is a particularly beneficial reconstruction method for older patients with massive proximal femoral bone loss.

股骨近端锁定钢板置换术治疗大量骨质流失1例。
股骨近端置换术(PFR)后股骨侧并发症,如股骨柄松动和假体周围骨折是再次手术的主要原因。股骨重建采用带锁定钢板的PFR进行,以尽量减少并发症的风险。我们报告一名85岁女性,双极半关节置换术后10年发生椎体干松动和大量股骨近端骨丢失(papprosky IV型)。股骨重建采用以下手术技术。移除之前的植入物后,将PFR插入股骨远端宿主骨,并用水泥将其固定在接口处。此外,还使用锁定板进行桥接。术后第二天开始全面负重康复。随访5年,患者行走平稳,无并发症。术后股骨x线片未见放射线、植入物相关问题或骨吸收的迹象。这种重建技术可以减少骨水泥假体的高扭转和压缩应力,这可能导致股侧并发症。即使在股骨宿主骨质量较差的情况下,这种重建方法也可以实现稳健的股骨重建。PFR带锁定钢板股骨重建对于股骨近端大量骨丢失的老年患者是一种特别有益的重建方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SICOT-J
SICOT-J ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信