Using an in-situ Simulation Model to Identify Deviations from Guideline-Based Management of Pediatric Status Epilepticus in Community Emergency Departments.

IF 1.5 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Open Access Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2025-05-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OAEM.S507770
Eliza T Firn, Rinat Jonas, Laurie M Douglass, Barbara M Walsh
{"title":"Using an in-situ Simulation Model to Identify Deviations from Guideline-Based Management of Pediatric Status Epilepticus in Community Emergency Departments.","authors":"Eliza T Firn, Rinat Jonas, Laurie M Douglass, Barbara M Walsh","doi":"10.2147/OAEM.S507770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with epilepsy are often presented to Community Emergency Departments (CEDs) for acute treatment of status epilepticus (SE). Timely medical management is imperative to prevent morbidity and mortality, and adherence to evidence-based guidelines improves outcomes for high stakes/low frequency events. Barriers to guideline adherent management in the CED setting are understudied; in-situ simulation (ISS) can be used to identify gaps in care for events such as pediatric SE.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective was to assess for deviations from evidence-based guidelines in the management of pediatric SE. A secondary objective was to explore potential barriers to practice within the evidence-based guidelines.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational ISS pilot study examining representative CED teams caring for a simulated child in SE. The primary outcome was overall adherence to the pediatric SE guidelines as measured by 12 metrics: 5 non-pharmacologic (for example: delays in vital sign assessment, failure to time seizure) and 7 pharmacologic (for example: incorrect benzodiazepine dose, delay in benzodiazepine administration or escalation to antiseizure medication). Additional metrics including provider knowledge (recognition of status epilepticus) and resources (antiseizure medications stocked) were analyzed as process measures. We enrolled 4 interprofessional teams at 4 participating ED sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 0 of the 4 teams adhered to all 12 metrics. A barrier to timely administration of benzodiazepines for two of the sites came from attempting IV access repeatedly. No team referenced an up-to-date treatment algorithm based on current evidence-based guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Standardized ISS scenarios identified variability in adherence to the pediatric SE guideline across a pilot sample of local CEDs. Barriers to guideline-adherent care occurred at both individual and systems levels. The study was limited in scope to 4 pilot sites.</p>","PeriodicalId":45096,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","volume":"17 ","pages":"165-171"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12067708/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAEM.S507770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Children with epilepsy are often presented to Community Emergency Departments (CEDs) for acute treatment of status epilepticus (SE). Timely medical management is imperative to prevent morbidity and mortality, and adherence to evidence-based guidelines improves outcomes for high stakes/low frequency events. Barriers to guideline adherent management in the CED setting are understudied; in-situ simulation (ISS) can be used to identify gaps in care for events such as pediatric SE.

Objective: The primary objective was to assess for deviations from evidence-based guidelines in the management of pediatric SE. A secondary objective was to explore potential barriers to practice within the evidence-based guidelines.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational ISS pilot study examining representative CED teams caring for a simulated child in SE. The primary outcome was overall adherence to the pediatric SE guidelines as measured by 12 metrics: 5 non-pharmacologic (for example: delays in vital sign assessment, failure to time seizure) and 7 pharmacologic (for example: incorrect benzodiazepine dose, delay in benzodiazepine administration or escalation to antiseizure medication). Additional metrics including provider knowledge (recognition of status epilepticus) and resources (antiseizure medications stocked) were analyzed as process measures. We enrolled 4 interprofessional teams at 4 participating ED sites.

Results: Overall, 0 of the 4 teams adhered to all 12 metrics. A barrier to timely administration of benzodiazepines for two of the sites came from attempting IV access repeatedly. No team referenced an up-to-date treatment algorithm based on current evidence-based guidelines.

Conclusion: Standardized ISS scenarios identified variability in adherence to the pediatric SE guideline across a pilot sample of local CEDs. Barriers to guideline-adherent care occurred at both individual and systems levels. The study was limited in scope to 4 pilot sites.

使用现场模拟模型识别社区急诊科儿童癫痫持续状态基于指南管理的偏差。
背景:儿童癫痫患者经常被送到社区急诊科(ced)急性治疗癫痫持续状态(SE)。及时的医疗管理对于预防发病率和死亡率至关重要,遵守循证指南可改善高风险/低频率事件的预后。在CED环境中遵循指南管理的障碍尚未得到充分研究;原位模拟(ISS)可用于识别儿科SE等事件的护理缺口。目的:主要目的是评估儿童SE管理中偏离循证指南的情况。第二个目标是探索在循证指南范围内进行实践的潜在障碍。方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性观察性ISS试点研究,检查了具有代表性的CED团队在SE中照顾一个模拟儿童。主要结局是通过12个指标衡量儿童SE指南的总体依从性:5个非药理学指标(例如:生命体征评估延迟,癫痫发作时间失败)和7个药理学指标(例如:苯二氮卓类药物剂量不正确,苯二氮卓类药物给药延迟或抗癫痫药物升级)。其他指标包括提供者知识(癫痫持续状态的识别)和资源(抗癫痫药物库存)作为过程措施进行分析。我们在4个参与ED站点招募了4个跨专业团队。结果:总的来说,4个团队中有0个坚持了所有12个指标。对其中两个地点及时给予苯二氮卓类药物的障碍是反复尝试静脉注射。没有团队参考基于当前循证指南的最新治疗算法。结论:标准化的ISS情景确定了在当地CEDs试点样本中遵守儿科SE指南的可变性。在个人和系统层面都存在遵循指南护理的障碍。这项研究的范围限于4个试验点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Access Emergency Medicine
Open Access Emergency Medicine EMERGENCY MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信