Process mapping as a framework to define critical care delivery steps in massive transfusion in trauma.

IF 2.4
CJEM Pub Date : 2025-04-16 DOI:10.1007/s43678-025-00898-2
Matthew A Bergens, Jessica D Guo, Bruce W Rogers, Ursula A Rogers, Jessica L Poisson, Emily C Sterrett, Zachary Ginsberg
{"title":"Process mapping as a framework to define critical care delivery steps in massive transfusion in trauma.","authors":"Matthew A Bergens, Jessica D Guo, Bruce W Rogers, Ursula A Rogers, Jessica L Poisson, Emily C Sterrett, Zachary Ginsberg","doi":"10.1007/s43678-025-00898-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to use process mapping to identify the critical process steps for executing massive transfusion in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock in an academic emergency department. Understanding the relationships and complexity of care delivery steps in massive transfusion is needed to inform the development of performance metrics and improve care delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This process mapping exercise was conducted in the academic emergency department of a verified trauma center using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement framework. Interviews were conducted with emergency department staff members, including nurses, technicians, pharmacists, and blood bank staff. Data collection included structured stakeholder interviews and real-time observation of massive transfusion protocol deployment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen interviews and real-time observations yielded 87 pages of interview text and 533 objects mapped. Two key clinical decision points were identified: the decision to transfuse and the decision to image. The process was segmented into initial protocol-based care and subsequent physician-driven care. High-level and mid-level process maps, incorporating swim lanes, were created to highlight the process steps to deliver of massive transfusion to trauma patient in our academic emergency department.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Process mapping resulted in the creation of an agreed upon standard process that outlines critical steps and distinct phases of care in delivery of the massive transfusion protocol. These findings provide benchmarks for future improvement work and performance measurement efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":93937,"journal":{"name":"CJEM","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CJEM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-025-00898-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to use process mapping to identify the critical process steps for executing massive transfusion in trauma patients with hemorrhagic shock in an academic emergency department. Understanding the relationships and complexity of care delivery steps in massive transfusion is needed to inform the development of performance metrics and improve care delivery.

Methods: This process mapping exercise was conducted in the academic emergency department of a verified trauma center using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement framework. Interviews were conducted with emergency department staff members, including nurses, technicians, pharmacists, and blood bank staff. Data collection included structured stakeholder interviews and real-time observation of massive transfusion protocol deployment.

Results: Seventeen interviews and real-time observations yielded 87 pages of interview text and 533 objects mapped. Two key clinical decision points were identified: the decision to transfuse and the decision to image. The process was segmented into initial protocol-based care and subsequent physician-driven care. High-level and mid-level process maps, incorporating swim lanes, were created to highlight the process steps to deliver of massive transfusion to trauma patient in our academic emergency department.

Conclusion: Process mapping resulted in the creation of an agreed upon standard process that outlines critical steps and distinct phases of care in delivery of the massive transfusion protocol. These findings provide benchmarks for future improvement work and performance measurement efforts.

过程绘图作为框架来定义创伤中大量输血的关键护理交付步骤。
目的:本质量改进计划的目的是使用流程图来确定在学术急诊科对创伤失血性休克患者进行大量输血的关键流程步骤。需要了解大规模输血中护理提供步骤的关系和复杂性,以便为绩效指标的制定提供信息并改善护理提供。方法:采用卫生保健改进研究所的框架,在一个经过验证的创伤中心的学术急诊科进行了这个过程绘图练习。对急诊科工作人员进行了访谈,包括护士、技术人员、药剂师和血库工作人员。数据收集包括结构化的利益相关者访谈和大规模输血协议部署的实时观察。结果:17次访谈和实时观察产生了87页访谈文本和533个对象映射。确定了两个关键的临床决策点:输注的决定和影像学的决定。该过程分为最初的基于协议的护理和随后的医生驱动的护理。我们创建了包含泳道的高级和中级流程图,以突出在我们的学术急诊科向创伤患者提供大量输血的流程步骤。结论:流程映射导致创建了一个商定的标准流程,概述了大规模输血方案交付中的关键步骤和不同的护理阶段。这些发现为未来的改进工作和绩效度量工作提供了基准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信