Adapting Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents in Iraq via Mobile Apps: Qualitative Study of Usability and Outcomes.

IF 2.1 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Radhwan Hussein Ibrahim, Marghoob Hussein Yaas, Mariwan Qadir Hamarash, Salwa Hazim Al-Mukhtar, Mohammed Faris Abdulghani, Osama Al Mushhadany
{"title":"Adapting Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Adolescents in Iraq via Mobile Apps: Qualitative Study of Usability and Outcomes.","authors":"Radhwan Hussein Ibrahim, Marghoob Hussein Yaas, Mariwan Qadir Hamarash, Salwa Hazim Al-Mukhtar, Mohammed Faris Abdulghani, Osama Al Mushhadany","doi":"10.2196/67137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mental health challenges, including anxiety and depression, are increasingly common among adolescents. Mobile health (mHealth) apps offer a promising way to deliver accessible cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions. However, research on the usability and effectiveness of apps explicitly tailored for adolescents is limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to explore the usability, engagement, and perceived effectiveness of a mobile CBT app designed for adolescents, focusing on user experiences and mental health outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative study was conducted with 40 adolescents aged 13-19 years (mean age 15.8, SD 1.9 years; 18/40, 45% male; 22/40, 55% female) who engaged with a CBT app for 4 weeks. Mental health diagnoses included anxiety (20/40, 50%), depression (15/40, 38%), and both (5/40, 13%). Of these, 10 (25%) of the 40 participants had previous CBT experience. Feedback was gathered through focus groups and individual interviews, and thematic analysis identified key themes related to usability, engagement, and perceived effectiveness. Quantitative data on mood and anxiety scores were analyzed with paired t tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean usability score was 3.8 (SD 0.6), and the mean effectiveness score was 3.9 (SD 0.7). Older participants (aged 16-19 years) reported significantly higher usability (mean 4.1, SD 0.4) and effectiveness scores (mean 4.3, SD 0.5) compared to younger participants (aged 13-15 years) (P=.03). Females had higher usability (mean 4, SD 0.6) and effectiveness scores (mean 4.2, SD 0.7) than males (mean 3.6, SD 0.7, and mean 3.5, SD 0.8, respectively; P=.03). Participants with prior CBT experience had 2.8 times higher odds of reporting high usability scores (95% CI 1.6-5; P=.002) and 3.1 times higher odds of reporting high effectiveness scores (95% CI 1.7-5.6; P=.001). Usability challenges included complex navigation (20/40, 50%), interface design issues (12/40, 30%), and content overload (8/40, 20%). Factors positively influencing engagement were motivation driven by personal relevance (20/40, 50%) and gamification features (10/40, 25%), while lack of personalization (14/40, 35%) and external distractions (18/40, 45%) were significant barriers. Mood improvement (15/40, 38%) and learning new coping skills (12/40, 30%) were the most reported outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mobile CBT app shows potential for improving adolescent mental health, with initial improvements in mood and anxiety. Future app iterations should prioritize simplifying navigation, adding personalization features, and enhancing technical stability to support long-term engagement.</p>","PeriodicalId":36223,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","volume":"8 ","pages":"e67137"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12039940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/67137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mental health challenges, including anxiety and depression, are increasingly common among adolescents. Mobile health (mHealth) apps offer a promising way to deliver accessible cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) interventions. However, research on the usability and effectiveness of apps explicitly tailored for adolescents is limited.

Objective: This study aimed to explore the usability, engagement, and perceived effectiveness of a mobile CBT app designed for adolescents, focusing on user experiences and mental health outcomes.

Methods: A qualitative study was conducted with 40 adolescents aged 13-19 years (mean age 15.8, SD 1.9 years; 18/40, 45% male; 22/40, 55% female) who engaged with a CBT app for 4 weeks. Mental health diagnoses included anxiety (20/40, 50%), depression (15/40, 38%), and both (5/40, 13%). Of these, 10 (25%) of the 40 participants had previous CBT experience. Feedback was gathered through focus groups and individual interviews, and thematic analysis identified key themes related to usability, engagement, and perceived effectiveness. Quantitative data on mood and anxiety scores were analyzed with paired t tests.

Results: The mean usability score was 3.8 (SD 0.6), and the mean effectiveness score was 3.9 (SD 0.7). Older participants (aged 16-19 years) reported significantly higher usability (mean 4.1, SD 0.4) and effectiveness scores (mean 4.3, SD 0.5) compared to younger participants (aged 13-15 years) (P=.03). Females had higher usability (mean 4, SD 0.6) and effectiveness scores (mean 4.2, SD 0.7) than males (mean 3.6, SD 0.7, and mean 3.5, SD 0.8, respectively; P=.03). Participants with prior CBT experience had 2.8 times higher odds of reporting high usability scores (95% CI 1.6-5; P=.002) and 3.1 times higher odds of reporting high effectiveness scores (95% CI 1.7-5.6; P=.001). Usability challenges included complex navigation (20/40, 50%), interface design issues (12/40, 30%), and content overload (8/40, 20%). Factors positively influencing engagement were motivation driven by personal relevance (20/40, 50%) and gamification features (10/40, 25%), while lack of personalization (14/40, 35%) and external distractions (18/40, 45%) were significant barriers. Mood improvement (15/40, 38%) and learning new coping skills (12/40, 30%) were the most reported outcomes.

Conclusions: The mobile CBT app shows potential for improving adolescent mental health, with initial improvements in mood and anxiety. Future app iterations should prioritize simplifying navigation, adding personalization features, and enhancing technical stability to support long-term engagement.

通过移动应用程序适应伊拉克青少年的认知行为疗法:可用性和结果的定性研究。
背景:心理健康挑战,包括焦虑和抑郁,在青少年中越来越普遍。移动医疗(mHealth)应用程序提供了一种很有前途的方式来提供可获得的认知行为治疗(CBT)干预。然而,明确为青少年量身定制的应用程序的可用性和有效性的研究是有限的。目的:本研究旨在探讨为青少年设计的移动CBT应用程序的可用性、参与度和感知有效性,重点关注用户体验和心理健康结果。方法:对40例13 ~ 19岁青少年(平均年龄15.8岁,SD 1.9岁;18/40, 45%男性;22/40(55%为女性),她们使用CBT应用程序4周。心理健康诊断包括焦虑(20/ 40,50 %)、抑郁(15/ 40,38 %)和两者兼而有之(5/ 40,13 %)。其中,40名参与者中有10名(25%)以前有过CBT经验。通过焦点小组和个人访谈收集反馈,主题分析确定了与可用性、参与度和感知有效性相关的关键主题。情绪和焦虑评分的定量数据采用配对t检验进行分析。结果:可用性评分平均为3.8分(SD 0.6),有效性评分平均为3.9分(SD 0.7)。与年轻参与者(13-15岁)相比,年龄较大的参与者(16-19岁)报告了更高的可用性(平均4.1,SD 0.4)和有效性评分(平均4.3,SD 0.5) (P=.03)。女性的可用性(平均4分,SD 0.6)和有效性得分(平均4.2分,SD 0.7)分别高于男性(平均3.6分,SD 0.7)和平均3.5分,SD 0.8;P = 03)。先前有CBT经验的参与者报告高可用性得分的几率高出2.8倍(95% CI 1.6-5;P=.002),报告高疗效评分的几率高出3.1倍(95% CI 1.7-5.6;P =措施)。可用性挑战包括复杂的导航(20/40,50%),界面设计问题(12/40,30%)和内容过载(8/40,20%)。积极影响用户粘性的因素是个人相关性驱动的动机(20/ 40,50 %)和游戏化功能(10/ 40,25 %),而缺乏个性化(14/ 40,35 %)和外部干扰(18/ 40,45 %)是主要障碍。情绪改善(15/ 40,38 %)和学习新的应对技能(12/ 40,30 %)是报告最多的结果。结论:移动CBT应用程序显示出改善青少年心理健康的潜力,在情绪和焦虑方面有初步改善。未来的应用迭代应该优先考虑简化导航,增加个性化功能,增强技术稳定性,以支持长期用户粘性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting Medicine-Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
5.40%
发文量
62
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信