Investigating the usability of mobile technology for driving rehabilitation post-stroke: a mixed-methods analysis.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Michael Cammarata, Ruheena Sangrar, Jocelyn E Harris, Ada Tang, Brenda Vrkljan
{"title":"Investigating the usability of mobile technology for driving rehabilitation post-stroke: a mixed-methods analysis.","authors":"Michael Cammarata, Ruheena Sangrar, Jocelyn E Harris, Ada Tang, Brenda Vrkljan","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2025.2498568","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke can have significant effects on an individual's ability to drive and remains a leading cause of driving restrictions for medical reasons. Mobile applications show promise in addressing driving-related deficits. However, there is limited research on their use for driving rehabilitation. This study explored how community-dwelling individuals with stroke and their caregivers use and perceive a specific application, DriveFocus<sup>®</sup>, for driving rehabilitation.<b>Methods:</b> A mixed-methods study with a triangulation design was conducted, tracking the use of DriveFocus<sup>®</sup> by <i>n</i> = 11 participant dyads (individuals with stroke and their caregivers) over four weeks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to provide insight into participants' perceptions of the application. Analysis of the results was guided by the Model of Acceptance of Mobile Technology by Older Adults (MAMTOA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Distinct patterns of use corresponding to the phases of the MAMTOA were identified. Two participants (<i>n</i> = 2/11) stopped using DriveFocus<sup>®</sup> after the second week, while the remaining nine (<i>n</i> = 9/11) continued throughout the study. Initial perceptions of the applications' usefulness and participants' experiences with learning barriers influenced acceptance. Having \"tech-savvy\" family members and engaging with gamification features were crucial for sustained use. Participants highlighted the importance of occupational therapists in connecting their DriveFocus<sup>®</sup> experience to their driving goal.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Understanding the factors that contribute to the use and acceptance of mobile applications for driving rehabilitation by individuals with stroke plays a critical role in advancing how technology is used to address impairments post-stroke. Future research should explore clinicians' perspectives on implementing such technology in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"2261-2277"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2025.2498568","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke can have significant effects on an individual's ability to drive and remains a leading cause of driving restrictions for medical reasons. Mobile applications show promise in addressing driving-related deficits. However, there is limited research on their use for driving rehabilitation. This study explored how community-dwelling individuals with stroke and their caregivers use and perceive a specific application, DriveFocus®, for driving rehabilitation.Methods: A mixed-methods study with a triangulation design was conducted, tracking the use of DriveFocus® by n = 11 participant dyads (individuals with stroke and their caregivers) over four weeks. Semi-structured interviews were conducted to provide insight into participants' perceptions of the application. Analysis of the results was guided by the Model of Acceptance of Mobile Technology by Older Adults (MAMTOA).

Results: Distinct patterns of use corresponding to the phases of the MAMTOA were identified. Two participants (n = 2/11) stopped using DriveFocus® after the second week, while the remaining nine (n = 9/11) continued throughout the study. Initial perceptions of the applications' usefulness and participants' experiences with learning barriers influenced acceptance. Having "tech-savvy" family members and engaging with gamification features were crucial for sustained use. Participants highlighted the importance of occupational therapists in connecting their DriveFocus® experience to their driving goal.

Discussion: Understanding the factors that contribute to the use and acceptance of mobile applications for driving rehabilitation by individuals with stroke plays a critical role in advancing how technology is used to address impairments post-stroke. Future research should explore clinicians' perspectives on implementing such technology in clinical practice.

研究移动技术对卒中后康复的可用性:一种混合方法分析。
背景:中风可以对个人的驾驶能力产生重大影响,并且仍然是医学原因限制驾驶的主要原因。移动应用程序有望解决与驾驶相关的缺陷。然而,关于它们在驾驶康复中的应用的研究有限。本研究探讨了社区居住的中风患者及其护理人员如何使用和感知驱动康复的特定应用程序DriveFocus®。方法:进行了一项采用三角测量设计的混合方法研究,在四周内跟踪n = 11名参与者(中风患者及其护理人员)对DriveFocus®的使用情况。进行了半结构化访谈,以深入了解参与者对应用程序的看法。分析结果以老年人对移动技术的接受模型(MAMTOA)为指导。结果:明确了与MAMTOA相对应的不同使用模式。两名参与者(n = 2/11)在第二周后停止使用DriveFocus®,而其余九名参与者(n = 9/11)在整个研究过程中继续使用。对应用程序有用性的初步认知和参与者在学习障碍方面的经历影响了接受度。拥有“精通技术”的家庭成员和参与游戏化功能对于持续使用至关重要。参与者强调了职业治疗师将他们的DriveFocus®经验与他们的驾驶目标联系起来的重要性。讨论:了解促使卒中患者使用和接受移动应用程序来推动康复的因素,对于推进如何使用技术来解决卒中后损伤具有至关重要的作用。未来的研究应探讨临床医生在临床实践中实施该技术的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信