Towards automatic quantification of operating table interaction in operating rooms.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Rick M Butler, Anne M Schouten, Anne C van der Eijk, Maarten van der Elst, Benno H W Hendriks, John J van den Dobbelsteen
{"title":"Towards automatic quantification of operating table interaction in operating rooms.","authors":"Rick M Butler, Anne M Schouten, Anne C van der Eijk, Maarten van der Elst, Benno H W Hendriks, John J van den Dobbelsteen","doi":"10.1007/s11548-025-03363-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Perioperative staff shortages are a problem in hospitals worldwide. Keeping the staff content and motivated is a challenge in the busy hospital setting of today. New operating room technologies aim to increase safety and efficiency. This causes a shift from interaction with patients to interaction with technology. Objectively measuring this shift could aid the design of supportive technological products, or optimal planning for high-tech procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>35 Gynaecological procedures of three different technology levels are recorded: open- (OS), minimally invasive- (MIS) and robot-assisted (RAS) surgery. We annotate interaction between staff and the patient. An algorithm is proposed that detects interaction with the operating table from staff posture and movement. Interaction is expressed as a percentage of total working time.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The proposed algorithm measures operating table interactions of 70.4%, 70.3% and 30.1% during OS, MIS and RAS. Annotations yield patient interaction percentages of 37.6%, 38.3% and 24.6%. Algorithm measurements over time show operating table and patient interaction peaks at anomalous events or workflow phase transitions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The annotations show less operating table and patient interactions during RAS than OS and MIS. Annotated patient interaction and measured operating table interaction show similar differences between procedures and workflow phases. The visual complexity of operating rooms complicates pose tracking, deteriorating the algorithm input quality. The proposed algorithm shows promise as a component in context-aware event- or workflow phase detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":51251,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-025-03363-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Perioperative staff shortages are a problem in hospitals worldwide. Keeping the staff content and motivated is a challenge in the busy hospital setting of today. New operating room technologies aim to increase safety and efficiency. This causes a shift from interaction with patients to interaction with technology. Objectively measuring this shift could aid the design of supportive technological products, or optimal planning for high-tech procedures.

Methods: 35 Gynaecological procedures of three different technology levels are recorded: open- (OS), minimally invasive- (MIS) and robot-assisted (RAS) surgery. We annotate interaction between staff and the patient. An algorithm is proposed that detects interaction with the operating table from staff posture and movement. Interaction is expressed as a percentage of total working time.

Results: The proposed algorithm measures operating table interactions of 70.4%, 70.3% and 30.1% during OS, MIS and RAS. Annotations yield patient interaction percentages of 37.6%, 38.3% and 24.6%. Algorithm measurements over time show operating table and patient interaction peaks at anomalous events or workflow phase transitions.

Conclusions: The annotations show less operating table and patient interactions during RAS than OS and MIS. Annotated patient interaction and measured operating table interaction show similar differences between procedures and workflow phases. The visual complexity of operating rooms complicates pose tracking, deteriorating the algorithm input quality. The proposed algorithm shows promise as a component in context-aware event- or workflow phase detection.

迈向手术室手术台交互作用的自动量化。
目的:围手术期人员短缺是世界各地医院普遍存在的问题。在当今繁忙的医院环境中,保持员工的工作内容和积极性是一项挑战。新的手术室技术旨在提高安全性和效率。这导致了从与患者互动到与技术互动的转变。客观地测量这种转变可以帮助设计支持性技术产品,或对高科技程序进行最佳规划。方法:记录35例不同技术水平的妇科手术:开放手术(OS)、微创手术(MIS)和机器人辅助手术(RAS)。我们对医护人员和病人之间的互动进行注释。提出了一种从工作人员的姿态和动作中检测与手术台交互的算法。交互以占总工作时间的百分比表示。结果:该算法在OS、MIS和RAS过程中分别测量了70.4%、70.3%和30.1%的手术台交互作用。注释产生的患者交互百分比分别为37.6%、38.3%和24.6%。随着时间的推移,算法测量显示手术台和患者交互在异常事件或工作流程阶段转换时达到峰值。结论:与OS和MIS相比,注释显示RAS期间手术台与患者的互动较少。标注的患者互动和测量的手术台互动在程序和工作流程阶段之间显示出类似的差异。手术室的视觉复杂性使姿态跟踪变得复杂,降低了算法输入的质量。所提出的算法在上下文感知事件或工作流阶段检测中显示出作为组件的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
243
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (IJCARS) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides a platform for closing the gap between medical and technical disciplines, and encourages interdisciplinary research and development activities in an international environment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信