The Impact of International Missions in Provision of Cardiac Services and Skill Transfer in Respect to Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting at Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute - Tanzania.

Evarist T M Nyawawa, Henry A Mayala, Peter R Kisenge, Moses Byomuganyizi, Alex B Joseph, Angela N Muhozya, Ramadhan Khamis, Evans E Nyawawa, Juma B Nyangasa, Adelphina Ncheye, Alex Loth, Aubyn Marath
{"title":"The Impact of International Missions in Provision of Cardiac Services and Skill Transfer in Respect to Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting at Jakaya Kikwete Cardiac Institute - Tanzania.","authors":"Evarist T M Nyawawa, Henry A Mayala, Peter R Kisenge, Moses Byomuganyizi, Alex B Joseph, Angela N Muhozya, Ramadhan Khamis, Evans E Nyawawa, Juma B Nyangasa, Adelphina Ncheye, Alex Loth, Aubyn Marath","doi":"10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0075","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess how efficient the local team attained skills are after several visits made by international missions in respect to number of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery performed and the overall patient outcome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective study that included all patients who were operated on at the center after being diagnosed with chronic coronary artery disease from May 2016 to December 2023. Patients' demographic data were retrieved from patients' files coupled with theatre record file, entered into a structured questionnaire, and then, in a statistical program.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 290 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting at the center. The international missions performed a total of 159 (54.8%) operations, while the local team operated a total of 131 (45.2%) patients. The study showed significant statistical difference in terms of total operation time (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.67, 6.01 vs. 95% CI = 6.32, 6.66), aortic cross-clamping time (95% CI = 75.92, 90.00 vs. 95% CI = 111.19, 126.65), and total cardiopulmonary bypass time (95% CI = 115.9, 134.75 vs. 95% CI = 174.52, 201.27) between the international missions and local surgical team, respectively. The mortality rate was higher in patients operated on by the local team (13.7%) than by international missions (8.8%), however there was no statistical difference.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study has shown the beneficial advantage of international surgical missions to newly established open-heart centers with advanced facilities and skill-deprived team. International surgical missions have greatly contributed to the progression of the center as they oversee and support the programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":72457,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","volume":"40 3","pages":"e20240075"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053801/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of cardiovascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21470/1678-9741-2024-0075","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess how efficient the local team attained skills are after several visits made by international missions in respect to number of coronary artery bypass grafting surgery performed and the overall patient outcome.

Methods: This was a retrospective study that included all patients who were operated on at the center after being diagnosed with chronic coronary artery disease from May 2016 to December 2023. Patients' demographic data were retrieved from patients' files coupled with theatre record file, entered into a structured questionnaire, and then, in a statistical program.

Results: A total of 290 patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting at the center. The international missions performed a total of 159 (54.8%) operations, while the local team operated a total of 131 (45.2%) patients. The study showed significant statistical difference in terms of total operation time (95% confidence interval [CI] = 5.67, 6.01 vs. 95% CI = 6.32, 6.66), aortic cross-clamping time (95% CI = 75.92, 90.00 vs. 95% CI = 111.19, 126.65), and total cardiopulmonary bypass time (95% CI = 115.9, 134.75 vs. 95% CI = 174.52, 201.27) between the international missions and local surgical team, respectively. The mortality rate was higher in patients operated on by the local team (13.7%) than by international missions (8.8%), however there was no statistical difference.

Conclusion: This study has shown the beneficial advantage of international surgical missions to newly established open-heart centers with advanced facilities and skill-deprived team. International surgical missions have greatly contributed to the progression of the center as they oversee and support the programs.

坦桑尼亚Jakaya Kikwete心脏研究所提供心脏服务和冠状动脉搭桥术技能转移的国际任务的影响。
目的:评估当地团队在国际访问团进行了几次访问后,在冠状动脉搭桥手术的数量和患者的总体预后方面获得技能的效率。方法:回顾性研究,纳入2016年5月至2023年12月诊断为慢性冠状动脉疾病后在该中心接受手术治疗的所有患者。患者的人口统计数据从患者档案和医院记录文件中检索,输入结构化问卷,然后,在统计程序中。结果:290例患者在中心行冠状动脉旁路移植术。国际医疗队共进行159例(54.8%)手术,而当地医疗队共进行131例(45.2%)手术。研究结果显示,在总手术时间(95%可信区间[CI] = 5.67, 6.01, 95% CI = 6.32, 6.66)、主动脉交叉夹持时间(95% CI = 75.92, 90.00, 95% CI = 111.19, 126.65)、总体外循环时间(95% CI = 115.9, 134.75, 95% CI = 174.52, 201.27)方面,国际医疗队与当地医疗队的差异具有统计学意义。当地团队手术的患者死亡率(13.7%)高于国际团队手术的患者死亡率(8.8%),但无统计学差异。结论:本研究显示了国际手术任务对新成立的设备先进、团队技能不足的心内直视中心的有利优势。国际外科任务极大地促进了中心的发展,因为他们监督和支持这些项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信