The Psychometric Properties of the Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Screening Acceptability Assessment (DMSA) Scale among General Population.

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Pediatric Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-07-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/1286029
Iman S Al-Gadi, Amirah D Albalawi, Reem A Al Khalifah
{"title":"The Psychometric Properties of the Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Screening Acceptability Assessment (DMSA) Scale among General Population.","authors":"Iman S Al-Gadi, Amirah D Albalawi, Reem A Al Khalifah","doi":"10.1155/2024/1286029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) screening facilitates access to early intervention and prevention of severe complications, such as diabetic ketoacidosis. Despite its significance, many countries lack a systematic T1DM screening program. Understanding how the public perceives T1DM screening for children is essential for successfully implementing such programs but is currently an area with limited research. Our study aims to fill this gap by developing a standardized tool designed to assess the acceptability of T1DM screening programs for children, focusing on caregiver perspectives within the general population.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We developed the Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Screening Acceptability (DMSA) scale based on the theoretical framework of acceptability and integrated components from the Pediatric Testing Attitudes Scale-Diabetes (P-TAS-D). It covers a broad spectrum of acceptability constructs. The DMSA scale underwent iterative modifications following expert feedback to refine clarity and content validity. We tested the scale in both Arabic and English with adults living in Saudi Arabia, regardless of their parental status, focusing on the potential of screening their children. The psychometric strengths of the scale were evaluated through reliability analyses and exploratory factor analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 599 participants, the majority were female (89.2%), with a mean age of 35.9 ± 8.6 years. The final DMSA scale consists of 10 items, with two distinct factors: \"individual acceptability\" and \"psychosocial acceptability.\" The mean total score was 42.9 ± 5.1 across a potential range of 10-50 points. The English and Arabic versions of the scale demonstrated strong reliability, with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.84 and 0.79, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DMSA scale emerges as a valid and reliable tool for gauging the acceptability of the general population of screening children for T1DM. It integrates key elements of the acceptability construct, pivotal for guiding the implementation of culturally sensitive T1DM screening initiatives. Future research should expand its application across various cultural settings and examine the correlation between scale scores and actual screening behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":19797,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Diabetes","volume":"2024 ","pages":"1286029"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12017164/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1286029","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) screening facilitates access to early intervention and prevention of severe complications, such as diabetic ketoacidosis. Despite its significance, many countries lack a systematic T1DM screening program. Understanding how the public perceives T1DM screening for children is essential for successfully implementing such programs but is currently an area with limited research. Our study aims to fill this gap by developing a standardized tool designed to assess the acceptability of T1DM screening programs for children, focusing on caregiver perspectives within the general population.

Materials and methods: We developed the Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus Screening Acceptability (DMSA) scale based on the theoretical framework of acceptability and integrated components from the Pediatric Testing Attitudes Scale-Diabetes (P-TAS-D). It covers a broad spectrum of acceptability constructs. The DMSA scale underwent iterative modifications following expert feedback to refine clarity and content validity. We tested the scale in both Arabic and English with adults living in Saudi Arabia, regardless of their parental status, focusing on the potential of screening their children. The psychometric strengths of the scale were evaluated through reliability analyses and exploratory factor analysis.

Results: Of the 599 participants, the majority were female (89.2%), with a mean age of 35.9 ± 8.6 years. The final DMSA scale consists of 10 items, with two distinct factors: "individual acceptability" and "psychosocial acceptability." The mean total score was 42.9 ± 5.1 across a potential range of 10-50 points. The English and Arabic versions of the scale demonstrated strong reliability, with Cronbach's alpha values of 0.84 and 0.79, respectively.

Conclusions: The DMSA scale emerges as a valid and reliable tool for gauging the acceptability of the general population of screening children for T1DM. It integrates key elements of the acceptability construct, pivotal for guiding the implementation of culturally sensitive T1DM screening initiatives. Future research should expand its application across various cultural settings and examine the correlation between scale scores and actual screening behaviors.

1型糖尿病筛查可接受性评估(DMSA)量表在普通人群中的心理测量特性。
背景:1型糖尿病(T1DM)筛查有助于早期干预和预防严重并发症,如糖尿病酮症酸中毒。尽管它具有重要意义,但许多国家缺乏系统的T1DM筛查计划。了解公众对儿童T1DM筛查的看法对于成功实施此类项目至关重要,但目前这一领域的研究有限。我们的研究旨在通过开发一种标准化的工具来评估儿童T1DM筛查项目的可接受性,从而填补这一空白,该工具侧重于一般人群中护理者的观点。材料与方法:在可接受性理论框架的基础上,结合儿科糖尿病测试态度量表(P-TAS-D)的成分,编制了1型糖尿病筛查可接受性量表(DMSA)。它涵盖了广泛的可接受性结构。DMSA量表在专家反馈后进行了反复修改,以完善清晰度和内容效度。我们用阿拉伯语和英语对生活在沙特阿拉伯的成年人进行了测试,不管他们的父母身份如何,重点关注筛查他们孩子的潜力。通过信度分析和探索性因子分析对量表的心理测量优势进行评价。结果:599例患者中,女性居多(89.2%),平均年龄35.9±8.6岁。最终的DMSA量表由10个项目组成,有两个不同的因素:“个人可接受性”和“社会心理可接受性”。在10-50分的范围内,平均总分为42.9±5.1。该量表的英文和阿拉伯文版本具有较强的信度,Cronbach’s alpha值分别为0.84和0.79。结论:DMSA量表是衡量一般人群对T1DM筛查儿童的接受程度的有效和可靠的工具。它整合了可接受性结构的关键要素,对于指导实施具有文化敏感性的T1DM筛查计划至关重要。未来的研究应扩大其在不同文化背景下的应用,并检验量表得分与实际筛查行为之间的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Diabetes
Pediatric Diabetes 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.70%
发文量
141
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Diabetes is a bi-monthly journal devoted to disseminating new knowledge relating to the epidemiology, etiology, pathogenesis, management, complications and prevention of diabetes in childhood and adolescence. The aim of the journal is to become the leading vehicle for international dissemination of research and practice relating to diabetes in youth. Papers are considered for publication based on the rigor of scientific approach, novelty, and importance for understanding mechanisms involved in the epidemiology and etiology of this disease, especially its molecular, biochemical and physiological aspects. Work relating to the clinical presentation, course, management and outcome of diabetes, including its physical and emotional sequelae, is considered. In vitro studies using animal or human tissues, whole animal and clinical studies in humans are also considered. The journal reviews full-length papers, preliminary communications with important new information, clinical reports, and reviews of major topics. Invited editorials, commentaries, and perspectives are a regular feature. The editors, based in the USA, Europe, and Australasia, maintain regular communications to assure rapid turnaround time of submitted manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信