Comparison of the effects of performing hard work well-based and enjoyment-based memories in reminiscence therapy on the quality of reminiscence in older people: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.7
Yui Komase, Kana Kito, Hitomi Tsuzuki, Kyosuke Yorozuya
{"title":"Comparison of the effects of performing hard work well-based and enjoyment-based memories in reminiscence therapy on the quality of reminiscence in older people: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Yui Komase, Kana Kito, Hitomi Tsuzuki, Kyosuke Yorozuya","doi":"10.1111/psyg.70036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study sought to examine whether reminiscence therapy based on memories of hard work is more effective than reminiscence therapy based on memories of enjoyment for promoting positive reminiscence (i.e., quality of reminiscence) associated with the prevention or reduction of depressive symptoms in community-dwelling older people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The participants were 26 community-dwelling older people (three men and 23 women) aged 65 or older who attended an elder citizens' club and a salon. Participants were randomly assigned to either the reminiscence therapy based on memories of hard work (recalling things they thought they did well in the past) group or the reminiscence therapy based on memories of enjoyment group. In both groups, the sessions lasted 30-50 min each, once a week, for 4 weeks. For assessment, we used the Positive and Negative Reminiscence Scale, the Geriatric Depression Scale 15, and the Life Satisfaction Index Z. Analysis of covariance using Bayesian statistics was conducted using the amount of change in each scale as the objective variable.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a significant difference between groups in the change in Positive Reminiscence Scale scores (expected a posteriori = -1.87, β = -0.23, t = -2.28, 95% Bayesian confidence interval = [-3.45, -0.26], P (b > 0) (which was calculated as the probability that the coefficient (b) was greater than zero) = 0.01), suggesting a small-to-moderate effect in the reminiscence therapy based on memories of enjoyment group compared with the reminiscence therapy based on memories of hard work group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The results suggested that reminiscence therapy based on memories of enjoyment may promote more positive reminiscence among community-dwelling older people than therapy based on memories of hard work.</p>","PeriodicalId":74597,"journal":{"name":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","volume":"25 3","pages":"e70036"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychogeriatrics : the official journal of the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.70036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study sought to examine whether reminiscence therapy based on memories of hard work is more effective than reminiscence therapy based on memories of enjoyment for promoting positive reminiscence (i.e., quality of reminiscence) associated with the prevention or reduction of depressive symptoms in community-dwelling older people.

Methods: The participants were 26 community-dwelling older people (three men and 23 women) aged 65 or older who attended an elder citizens' club and a salon. Participants were randomly assigned to either the reminiscence therapy based on memories of hard work (recalling things they thought they did well in the past) group or the reminiscence therapy based on memories of enjoyment group. In both groups, the sessions lasted 30-50 min each, once a week, for 4 weeks. For assessment, we used the Positive and Negative Reminiscence Scale, the Geriatric Depression Scale 15, and the Life Satisfaction Index Z. Analysis of covariance using Bayesian statistics was conducted using the amount of change in each scale as the objective variable.

Results: There was a significant difference between groups in the change in Positive Reminiscence Scale scores (expected a posteriori = -1.87, β = -0.23, t = -2.28, 95% Bayesian confidence interval = [-3.45, -0.26], P (b > 0) (which was calculated as the probability that the coefficient (b) was greater than zero) = 0.01), suggesting a small-to-moderate effect in the reminiscence therapy based on memories of enjoyment group compared with the reminiscence therapy based on memories of hard work group.

Conclusions: The results suggested that reminiscence therapy based on memories of enjoyment may promote more positive reminiscence among community-dwelling older people than therapy based on memories of hard work.

在回忆疗法中,以努力工作为基础的记忆和以享受为基础的记忆对老年人回忆质量的影响比较:一项随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在检验基于辛苦工作记忆的回忆疗法是否比基于享受记忆的回忆疗法更有效地促进与预防或减轻社区居住老年人抑郁症状相关的积极回忆(即回忆质量)。方法:参与者为26名65岁及以上的社区老年人(3男23女),他们参加了老年人俱乐部和沙龙。参与者被随机分配到基于努力工作记忆的回忆疗法组(回忆他们认为自己过去做得很好的事情)和基于快乐记忆的回忆疗法组。两组均为每次30-50分钟,每周1次,连续4周。在评估方面,我们使用了正面和负面回忆量表、老年抑郁量表15和生活满意度指数z。我们使用贝叶斯统计进行协方差分析,并将每个量表的变化量作为客观变量。结果:组之间有显著差异的变化积极回忆量表评分(期望后验= -1.87,β= -0.23,t = -2.28, 95%贝叶斯置信区间= [-3.45,-0.26],P (b > 0)(计算的概率系数(b)是大于0)= 0.01),建议中小型的影响基于快乐的记忆回忆疗法组与回忆疗法基于记忆的辛勤工作。结论:基于享乐记忆的回忆疗法比基于辛苦工作记忆的回忆疗法更能促进社区老年人的积极回忆。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信