Interrater Agreement of Physicians Identifying Lung Sliding Artifact on B-Mode And M-Mode Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS).

POCUS journal Pub Date : 2025-04-15 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.17807
Ross Prager, Hans Clausdorff Fiedler, Delaney Smith, Derek Wu, Robert Arntfield
{"title":"Interrater Agreement of Physicians Identifying Lung Sliding Artifact on B-Mode And M-Mode Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS).","authors":"Ross Prager, Hans Clausdorff Fiedler, Delaney Smith, Derek Wu, Robert Arntfield","doi":"10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.17807","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chest point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a first-line diagnostic test to identify lung sliding, an important artifact to diagnose or rule out pneumothorax. Despite enthusiastic adoption of this modality, the interrater reliability for physicians to identify lung sliding is unknown. Additionally, the relative diagnostic performance of physicians interpreting B-mode and M-mode ultrasound is unclear. We sought to determine the interrater reliability of physicians to detect lung sliding on B-mode and M-mode POCUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cross-sectional interrater agreement study surveying acute care physicians on their interpretation of 20 B-mode and M-mode POCUS clips. Two experienced clinicians determined the reference standard diagnosis. Respondents reported their interpretation of each POCUS B-mode clip or M-mode image. The primary outcome was the interrater agreement, determined by an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From September to November 2023, there were 20 survey respondents. Fourteen (70%) respondents were resident physicians. Respondents were confident or very confident in their skill performing chest POCUS in 14 (70%) cases, with 19 (90%) performing chest POCUS every week or more frequently. The ICC on B-mode was 0.44 and for M-mode was 0.43, indicating moderate agreement. There were no significant differences in interrater reliability between subgroups of confidence or experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is only moderate interrater reliability between clinicians to diagnose lung sliding. Clinicians have superior accuracy on B-mode compared to M-mode clips.</p>","PeriodicalId":74470,"journal":{"name":"POCUS journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"92-98"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12057470/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"POCUS journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24908/pocusj.v10i01.17807","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chest point of care ultrasound (POCUS) is a first-line diagnostic test to identify lung sliding, an important artifact to diagnose or rule out pneumothorax. Despite enthusiastic adoption of this modality, the interrater reliability for physicians to identify lung sliding is unknown. Additionally, the relative diagnostic performance of physicians interpreting B-mode and M-mode ultrasound is unclear. We sought to determine the interrater reliability of physicians to detect lung sliding on B-mode and M-mode POCUS.

Methods: We performed a cross-sectional interrater agreement study surveying acute care physicians on their interpretation of 20 B-mode and M-mode POCUS clips. Two experienced clinicians determined the reference standard diagnosis. Respondents reported their interpretation of each POCUS B-mode clip or M-mode image. The primary outcome was the interrater agreement, determined by an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC).

Results: From September to November 2023, there were 20 survey respondents. Fourteen (70%) respondents were resident physicians. Respondents were confident or very confident in their skill performing chest POCUS in 14 (70%) cases, with 19 (90%) performing chest POCUS every week or more frequently. The ICC on B-mode was 0.44 and for M-mode was 0.43, indicating moderate agreement. There were no significant differences in interrater reliability between subgroups of confidence or experience.

Conclusion: There is only moderate interrater reliability between clinicians to diagnose lung sliding. Clinicians have superior accuracy on B-mode compared to M-mode clips.

医师在b型和m型护理点超声(POCUS)上识别肺滑动伪影的一致性。
背景:胸部护理点超声(POCUS)是鉴别肺滑动的一线诊断检查,是诊断或排除气胸的重要伪影。尽管热衷于采用这种模式,但医生识别肺滑动的相互可靠性尚不清楚。此外,医生解释b型和m型超声的相对诊断性能尚不清楚。我们试图确定医生在b型和m型POCUS上检测肺滑动的相互可靠性。方法:我们进行了一项横断面间一致性研究,调查了急症护理医生对20个b模式和m模式POCUS剪辑的解释。两位经验丰富的临床医生确定了参考标准诊断。受访者报告了他们对每个POCUS b模式剪辑或m模式图像的解释。主要结局是由组内相关系数(ICC)决定的组间一致性。结果:2023年9月至11月,共调查对象20人。14名(70%)受访者是住院医师。14例(70%)受访者对自己进行胸部POCUS的技能有信心或非常有信心,19例(90%)每周或更频繁地进行胸部POCUS。b模式下的ICC为0.44,m模式下的ICC为0.43,一致性中等。在信心或经验亚组之间的判读者信度无显著差异。结论:临床医生之间诊断肺滑动的可信度仅为中等。临床医生在b型与m型夹上具有更高的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信