Natural Experiments to Inform Clinical Practice.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-22 DOI:10.1056/EVIDra2400268
Atheendar S Venkataramani, Elizabeth F Bair
{"title":"Natural Experiments to Inform Clinical Practice.","authors":"Atheendar S Venkataramani, Elizabeth F Bair","doi":"10.1056/EVIDra2400268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AbstractNatural experiments refer to events or practices that result in similar individuals receiving different services or interventions for arbitrary reasons. In the clinical context, researchers may wish to leverage natural experiments to estimate the causal impact of a particular treatment on a health outcome in situations where randomized clinical trial data are unavailable and other observational research designs are likely to yield biased results. This review provides an overview of natural experiments, discusses the potential for natural experiments to establish cause and effect, illustrates applications to specific clinical questions, and outlines situations and practices where natural experiments are most likely to answer the question at hand. Overall, while natural experiments have become popular in health policy, the widespread application of these approaches to specific clinical questions faces several challenges.</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":"4 5","pages":"EVIDra2400268"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDra2400268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractNatural experiments refer to events or practices that result in similar individuals receiving different services or interventions for arbitrary reasons. In the clinical context, researchers may wish to leverage natural experiments to estimate the causal impact of a particular treatment on a health outcome in situations where randomized clinical trial data are unavailable and other observational research designs are likely to yield biased results. This review provides an overview of natural experiments, discusses the potential for natural experiments to establish cause and effect, illustrates applications to specific clinical questions, and outlines situations and practices where natural experiments are most likely to answer the question at hand. Overall, while natural experiments have become popular in health policy, the widespread application of these approaches to specific clinical questions faces several challenges.

指导临床实践的自然实验。
摘要自然实验是指由于任意原因导致相似个体接受不同服务或干预的事件或实践。在临床环境中,研究人员可能希望在随机临床试验数据不可用和其他观察性研究设计可能产生偏倚结果的情况下,利用自然实验来估计特定治疗对健康结果的因果影响。这篇综述提供了自然实验的概述,讨论了自然实验建立因果关系的潜力,说明了在特定临床问题上的应用,并概述了自然实验最有可能回答手头问题的情况和实践。总的来说,虽然自然实验在卫生政策中变得流行,但这些方法在特定临床问题上的广泛应用面临着一些挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信