Philipp Reschke MD , Jennifer Gotta MD , Leon D. Gruenewald MD , Ahmed Ait Bachir MD , Ralph Strecker PhD , Dominik Nickel PhD , Christian Booz MD , Simon S. Martin MD , Jan-Erik Scholtz MD , Tommaso D’Angelo MD , Daniel Dahm cand. med. , Levent A. Solim MD , Paul Konrad cand. med. , Scherwin Mahmoudi MD , Simon Bernatz MD , Saber Al-Saleh Mr , Quang Anh Le Hong MD , Christof M. Sommer MD , Katrin Eichler MD , Thomas J. Vogl MD , Vitali Koch MD
{"title":"Deep Learning in Knee MRI: A Prospective Study to Enhance Efficiency, Diagnostic Confidence and Sustainability","authors":"Philipp Reschke MD , Jennifer Gotta MD , Leon D. Gruenewald MD , Ahmed Ait Bachir MD , Ralph Strecker PhD , Dominik Nickel PhD , Christian Booz MD , Simon S. Martin MD , Jan-Erik Scholtz MD , Tommaso D’Angelo MD , Daniel Dahm cand. med. , Levent A. Solim MD , Paul Konrad cand. med. , Scherwin Mahmoudi MD , Simon Bernatz MD , Saber Al-Saleh Mr , Quang Anh Le Hong MD , Christof M. Sommer MD , Katrin Eichler MD , Thomas J. Vogl MD , Vitali Koch MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>The objective of this study was to evaluate a combination of deep learning (DL)-reconstructed parallel acquisition technique (PAT) and simultaneous multislice (SMS) acceleration imaging in comparison to conventional knee imaging.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>Adults undergoing knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DL-enhanced acquisitions were prospectively analyzed from December 2023 to April 2024. The participants received T1 without fat saturation and fat-suppressed PD-weighted TSE pulse sequences using conventional two-fold PAT (P2) and either DL-enhanced four-fold PAT (P4) or a combination of DL-enhanced four-fold PAT with two-fold SMS acceleration (P4S2). Three independent readers assessed image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and radiomics features.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>34 participants (mean age 45<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->17<!--> <!-->years; 14 women) were included who underwent P4S2, P4, and P2 imaging. Both P4S2 and P4 demonstrated higher CNR and SNR values compared to P2 (P<.001). P4 was diagnostically inferior to P2 only in the visualization of cartilage damage (P<.005), while P4S2 consistently outperformed P2 in anatomical delineation across all evaluated structures and raters (P<.05). Radiomics analysis revealed significant differences in contrast and gray-level characteristics among P2, P4, and P4S2 (P<.05). P4 reduced time by 31% and P4S2 by 41% compared to P2 (P<.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>P4S2 DL acceleration offers significant advancements over P4 and P2 in knee MRI, combining superior image quality and improved anatomical delineation at significant time reduction. Its improvements in anatomical delineation, energy consumption, and workforce optimization make P4S2 a significant step forward.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 6","pages":"Pages 3585-3596"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225002156","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and Objectives
The objective of this study was to evaluate a combination of deep learning (DL)-reconstructed parallel acquisition technique (PAT) and simultaneous multislice (SMS) acceleration imaging in comparison to conventional knee imaging.
Materials and Methods
Adults undergoing knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with DL-enhanced acquisitions were prospectively analyzed from December 2023 to April 2024. The participants received T1 without fat saturation and fat-suppressed PD-weighted TSE pulse sequences using conventional two-fold PAT (P2) and either DL-enhanced four-fold PAT (P4) or a combination of DL-enhanced four-fold PAT with two-fold SMS acceleration (P4S2). Three independent readers assessed image quality, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and radiomics features.
Results
34 participants (mean age 45 ± 17 years; 14 women) were included who underwent P4S2, P4, and P2 imaging. Both P4S2 and P4 demonstrated higher CNR and SNR values compared to P2 (P<.001). P4 was diagnostically inferior to P2 only in the visualization of cartilage damage (P<.005), while P4S2 consistently outperformed P2 in anatomical delineation across all evaluated structures and raters (P<.05). Radiomics analysis revealed significant differences in contrast and gray-level characteristics among P2, P4, and P4S2 (P<.05). P4 reduced time by 31% and P4S2 by 41% compared to P2 (P<.05).
Conclusion
P4S2 DL acceleration offers significant advancements over P4 and P2 in knee MRI, combining superior image quality and improved anatomical delineation at significant time reduction. Its improvements in anatomical delineation, energy consumption, and workforce optimization make P4S2 a significant step forward.
期刊介绍:
Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.