{"title":"End-Of-Life Simulation in Undergraduate Nursing Curricula: A Cross-Sectional Survey.","authors":"Cindy Hoang, Beverley Copnell, Sharon Bourke, Monica Peddle","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this study was to explore end-of-life simulation in undergraduate nursing curricula in Australian and New Zealand institutions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional descriptive research design was employed. The study is reported using the CROSS checklist.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed to 45 institutions with an accredited Bachelor of Nursing programme in Australia or New Zealand. The instrument comprised eight domains: simulation orientation, simulator type, simulation environment, instructional design, simulation event, pre-brief, debrief, and facilitation preparation and requirements.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty institutions responded to the survey, with 25 suitable for data analysis. Eleven institutions included end-of-life simulation in their curriculum. The dominant modality used in the end-of-life simulation was high-technology manikins. All institutions used a validated approach to conducting the pre-brief and debrief. Variations were reported in the skill and clinical expertise required of end-of-life simulation facilitators and the approaches and modalities used in end-of-life simulations across institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A small number of institutions reported including end-of-life simulations in their undergraduate nursing curriculum. This study found the end-of-life simulations integrated into undergraduate nursing curricula in Australia and New Zealand align with many elements of the Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice. There were variations in the simulation modality and facilitation style used to deliver end-of-life simulations across institutions. While a pre-brief session was included, the elements covered and information conveyed to participants varied across institutions. Additionally, the content expertise required of simulation facilitators lacked clarity.</p><p><strong>Recommendation for future research: </strong>The influence the pre-brief has on the student learning experience requires further research. Moreover, the learning experiences of the participants in various simulation modalities, including the influence of SPs and debriefing approaches, warrant investigation. The role and impact of professional development and facilitator requirements, such as skills and clinical expertise, on the student learning experiences and outcomes in EOL simulation offer opportunities for further research.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>There were no patient or public contributions in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17776","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The aim of this study was to explore end-of-life simulation in undergraduate nursing curricula in Australian and New Zealand institutions.
Design: A cross-sectional descriptive research design was employed. The study is reported using the CROSS checklist.
Methods: A survey was distributed to 45 institutions with an accredited Bachelor of Nursing programme in Australia or New Zealand. The instrument comprised eight domains: simulation orientation, simulator type, simulation environment, instructional design, simulation event, pre-brief, debrief, and facilitation preparation and requirements.
Results: Thirty institutions responded to the survey, with 25 suitable for data analysis. Eleven institutions included end-of-life simulation in their curriculum. The dominant modality used in the end-of-life simulation was high-technology manikins. All institutions used a validated approach to conducting the pre-brief and debrief. Variations were reported in the skill and clinical expertise required of end-of-life simulation facilitators and the approaches and modalities used in end-of-life simulations across institutions.
Conclusion: A small number of institutions reported including end-of-life simulations in their undergraduate nursing curriculum. This study found the end-of-life simulations integrated into undergraduate nursing curricula in Australia and New Zealand align with many elements of the Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best Practice. There were variations in the simulation modality and facilitation style used to deliver end-of-life simulations across institutions. While a pre-brief session was included, the elements covered and information conveyed to participants varied across institutions. Additionally, the content expertise required of simulation facilitators lacked clarity.
Recommendation for future research: The influence the pre-brief has on the student learning experience requires further research. Moreover, the learning experiences of the participants in various simulation modalities, including the influence of SPs and debriefing approaches, warrant investigation. The role and impact of professional development and facilitator requirements, such as skills and clinical expertise, on the student learning experiences and outcomes in EOL simulation offer opportunities for further research.
Patient or public contribution: There were no patient or public contributions in this study.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice.
JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice.
We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
