Identifying proximity to white matter language tracts with gradient-based intraoperative electrical mapping.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Naomi Kahana, Akiva Korn, Naama Friedmann, Carla Richetta, Guy Gurevitch, Moran Artzi, Nimrod Keren, Zvi Ram, Tal Shahar, Rachel Grossman
{"title":"Identifying proximity to white matter language tracts with gradient-based intraoperative electrical mapping.","authors":"Naomi Kahana, Akiva Korn, Naama Friedmann, Carla Richetta, Guy Gurevitch, Moran Artzi, Nimrod Keren, Zvi Ram, Tal Shahar, Rachel Grossman","doi":"10.3171/2025.1.JNS241036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intraoperative identification of language white matter tracts (WMTs) is challenging, as these tracts are visually imperceptible. This study aimed to assess whether proximity to the language WMTs can be determined intraoperatively by correlating direct electrical stimulation (DES) intensity with the distance to language tracts as defined by preoperative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based tractography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-eight patients undergoing awake craniotomy for diffuse glioma resection participated in the study. All patients received preoperative language assessments and DTI-based language tract reconstruction. Subcortical DES was applied along the tumor cavity border using bipolar or monopolar stimulation, with DES locations registered for offline analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A positive linear correlation was found between the distance from the stimulated point to the closest language WMT and the subcortical DES electrical threshold (r = 0.57). Stimulation that evoked interference had a significantly lower intensity (mean 6.93, SD 3.82; n = 21) than noninterfering cases [mean 15.06, SD 7.4; n = 11; t(30) = 3.2, p < 0.001]. Tumor pathology, volume, and associated edema did not significantly affect the distance-intensity correlation or likelihood of language interference. Only the bipolar stimulation correlation remained significant following separate analysis of the bipolar and monopolar methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that intraoperative threshold-based electrical mapping can feasibly assess language tract proximity, supporting maximal tumor resection while minimizing language deficits.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.1.JNS241036","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Intraoperative identification of language white matter tracts (WMTs) is challenging, as these tracts are visually imperceptible. This study aimed to assess whether proximity to the language WMTs can be determined intraoperatively by correlating direct electrical stimulation (DES) intensity with the distance to language tracts as defined by preoperative diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)-based tractography.

Methods: Twenty-eight patients undergoing awake craniotomy for diffuse glioma resection participated in the study. All patients received preoperative language assessments and DTI-based language tract reconstruction. Subcortical DES was applied along the tumor cavity border using bipolar or monopolar stimulation, with DES locations registered for offline analysis.

Results: A positive linear correlation was found between the distance from the stimulated point to the closest language WMT and the subcortical DES electrical threshold (r = 0.57). Stimulation that evoked interference had a significantly lower intensity (mean 6.93, SD 3.82; n = 21) than noninterfering cases [mean 15.06, SD 7.4; n = 11; t(30) = 3.2, p < 0.001]. Tumor pathology, volume, and associated edema did not significantly affect the distance-intensity correlation or likelihood of language interference. Only the bipolar stimulation correlation remained significant following separate analysis of the bipolar and monopolar methods.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that intraoperative threshold-based electrical mapping can feasibly assess language tract proximity, supporting maximal tumor resection while minimizing language deficits.

用基于梯度的术中电图识别接近白质语言束。
目的:术中识别语言白质束(WMTs)具有挑战性,因为这些束在视觉上难以察觉。本研究旨在评估术中是否可以通过将直接电刺激(DES)强度与术前基于弥散张量成像(DTI)的神经束造影确定的到语言神经束的距离相关联来确定与语言神经束的接近程度。方法:对28例接受清醒开颅行弥漫性胶质瘤切除术的患者进行研究。所有患者均接受术前语言评估和基于dti的语道重建。通过双极或单极刺激沿肿瘤腔边界施加皮质下DES,并记录DES位置以进行离线分析。结果:受刺激点到最近语言WMT的距离与皮层下DES电阈值呈正相关(r = 0.57)。诱发干扰的刺激强度明显较低(平均6.93,标准差3.82;n = 21)优于非干扰病例[平均15.06,标准差7.4;N = 11;T (30) = 3.2, p < 0.001]。肿瘤病理、体积和相关水肿对距离-强度相关性或语言干扰的可能性没有显著影响。在对双极和单极方法进行单独分析后,只有双极刺激的相关性仍然显著。结论:这些发现表明术中基于阈值的电成像可以评估语道接近程度,支持最大限度地切除肿瘤,同时最大限度地减少语言缺陷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信