The neuronal reserve in glioma surgery: functional reorganization of the motor network examined by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion tensor imaging tractography.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Fabia Roth, Leona Kawelke, Thomas Picht, Peter Vajkoczy, Anna Zdunczyk
{"title":"The neuronal reserve in glioma surgery: functional reorganization of the motor network examined by navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion tensor imaging tractography.","authors":"Fabia Roth, Leona Kawelke, Thomas Picht, Peter Vajkoczy, Anna Zdunczyk","doi":"10.3171/2025.1.JNS241103","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Patients suffering from rolandic gliomas are differently affected by motor deficits due to the lesion growth and edema as well as the surgical intervention. One reason for the different dynamics of disease progression and surgical outcome might be an individual potential for compensation and adaptation of the motor network. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the reorganization capacity of the motor cortex in patients with glioma by using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion tensor imaging tractography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cortical motor representation area of the first dorsal interosseous muscle was mapped preoperatively on both hemispheres in 27 patients suffering from glioma (WHO grade ≥ II) in the primary or secondary motor cortex and in 17 follow-up patients (median 7 [IQR 6.5, 8.5] months after surgery). Twenty-eight healthy volunteers served as the control group. Motor function was evaluated based on the British Medical Research Council scale. Corticospinal excitability was determined by the resting motor threshold (RMT) and recruitment curve, and the cortical representation by mapping of the motor area with 105% RMT. Intracortical inhibition was reflected by the cortical silent period. The corticospinal tract integrity was determined by diffusion tensor imaging tractography including fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A motor paresis was preoperatively seen in 47% of the patients, which diminished to 23% at follow-up. The preoperatively observed RMT difference between the hemispheres diminished after 7 months (p < 0.05). An increased cortical excitability at follow-up was also indicated by less cortical inhibition (p < 0.05). A preoperatively small motor area size, excitability, and volume increased the risk for postoperative motor deficit (p < 0.05). Corticospinal tract disintegrity was associated with motor impairment (p < 0.05). Motor area reshaping expressed by a hotspot and center of gravity relocation could be observed in patients recovering from a motor deficit (p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study confirmed prior findings on glioma-induced reorganization of primary motor areas. The association between functional recovery and reorganization, especially resizing and excitability changes, suggests an individual neuronal reserve explaining differences in disease progression. The authors support the extended consideration of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation data for preoperative risk stratification and patient-tailored treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2025.1.JNS241103","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Patients suffering from rolandic gliomas are differently affected by motor deficits due to the lesion growth and edema as well as the surgical intervention. One reason for the different dynamics of disease progression and surgical outcome might be an individual potential for compensation and adaptation of the motor network. The aim of the present study was therefore to investigate the reorganization capacity of the motor cortex in patients with glioma by using navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation and diffusion tensor imaging tractography.

Methods: The cortical motor representation area of the first dorsal interosseous muscle was mapped preoperatively on both hemispheres in 27 patients suffering from glioma (WHO grade ≥ II) in the primary or secondary motor cortex and in 17 follow-up patients (median 7 [IQR 6.5, 8.5] months after surgery). Twenty-eight healthy volunteers served as the control group. Motor function was evaluated based on the British Medical Research Council scale. Corticospinal excitability was determined by the resting motor threshold (RMT) and recruitment curve, and the cortical representation by mapping of the motor area with 105% RMT. Intracortical inhibition was reflected by the cortical silent period. The corticospinal tract integrity was determined by diffusion tensor imaging tractography including fractional anisotropy and apparent diffusion coefficient.

Results: A motor paresis was preoperatively seen in 47% of the patients, which diminished to 23% at follow-up. The preoperatively observed RMT difference between the hemispheres diminished after 7 months (p < 0.05). An increased cortical excitability at follow-up was also indicated by less cortical inhibition (p < 0.05). A preoperatively small motor area size, excitability, and volume increased the risk for postoperative motor deficit (p < 0.05). Corticospinal tract disintegrity was associated with motor impairment (p < 0.05). Motor area reshaping expressed by a hotspot and center of gravity relocation could be observed in patients recovering from a motor deficit (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions: This study confirmed prior findings on glioma-induced reorganization of primary motor areas. The association between functional recovery and reorganization, especially resizing and excitability changes, suggests an individual neuronal reserve explaining differences in disease progression. The authors support the extended consideration of navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation data for preoperative risk stratification and patient-tailored treatment strategies.

神经胶质瘤手术中的神经元储备:经颅磁刺激和扩散张量成像神经束造影检查运动网络的功能重组。
目的:罗兰神经胶质瘤患者由于病变生长和水肿导致的运动障碍以及手术干预的不同而受到不同程度的影响。疾病进展和手术结果的不同动力学的一个原因可能是运动网络的补偿和适应的个体潜力。因此,本研究的目的是通过导航经颅磁刺激和弥散张量成像技术来研究胶质瘤患者运动皮层的重组能力。方法:对27例原发性或继发性神经胶质瘤(WHO分级≥II级)患者和17例随访患者(术后中位7 [IQR 6.5, 8.5]个月)术前在双脑半球绘制第一背骨间肌皮层运动表征区。28名健康志愿者作为对照组。运动功能根据英国医学研究委员会量表进行评估。皮质脊髓兴奋性由静息运动阈值(RMT)和招募曲线确定,并通过105% RMT映射运动区域的皮质表征来确定。皮质内抑制反应为皮质沉默期。采用弥散张量成像法测定皮质脊髓束的完整性,包括各向异性分数和表观扩散系数。结果:47%的患者术前出现运动麻痹,随访时减少到23%。术前观察7个月后两半球间RMT差异减小(p < 0.05)。随访时皮质兴奋性增加,皮质抑制减少(p < 0.05)。术前较小的运动面积、兴奋性和体积增加了术后运动功能障碍的风险(p < 0.05)。皮质脊髓束不完整与运动障碍相关(p < 0.05)。运动缺陷恢复期患者可观察到以热点和重心重新定位表达的运动区域重塑(p < 0.0001)。结论:本研究证实了先前关于神经胶质瘤诱导初级运动区重组的发现。功能恢复和重组之间的联系,特别是大小调整和兴奋性变化,表明个体神经元储备解释了疾病进展的差异。作者支持扩大考虑导航经颅磁刺激数据的术前风险分层和患者量身定制的治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信