Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review of Outcomes From Systemic Therapies.

IF 1.5 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
International Journal of Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-04-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/ijh/1083642
Dujinthan Jayabalan, Sugam Dhakal, Aarohanan Raguragavan, Akshat Saxena, Gary P Jeffrey, Luis Calzadilla-Bertot, Leon A Adams, Michael C Wallace
{"title":"Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Health-Related Quality of Life: A Systematic Review of Outcomes From Systemic Therapies.","authors":"Dujinthan Jayabalan, Sugam Dhakal, Aarohanan Raguragavan, Akshat Saxena, Gary P Jeffrey, Luis Calzadilla-Bertot, Leon A Adams, Michael C Wallace","doi":"10.1155/ijh/1083642","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Poor outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) coupled with potential significant treatment side effects underpin a strong rationale to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in those treated with systemic therapies. This study is aimed at quantifying the effect of systemic therapies on HRQOL outcomes in HCC patients when compared to baseline or placebo, other systemic therapies, and transarterial radioembolisation (TARE). <b>Methods:</b> In May 2024, two independent reviewers searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for studies comparing postsystemic therapy HRQOL scores in adult patients with HCC to baseline or placebo, other systemic therapies, or to TARE. Narrative synthesis was used to synthesise results. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. This review was structured according to PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO register (CRD42024521699). <b>Results:</b> Twenty-nine studies with 10,472 patients using eight HRQOL instruments were included. Compared to baseline, patients on atezolizumab/bevacizumab and sorafenib both experienced significant declines in HRQOL, and lenvatinib nonsignificantly decreased HRQOL. HRQOL remained unchanged in patients on pembrolizumab or nivolumab. Atezolizumab/bevacizumab and lenvatinib both significantly delayed HRQOL deterioration compared to sorafenib. Compared to TARE, atezolizumab/bevacizumab delayed time-to-deterioration in HRQOL, whereas sorafenib had significantly worse HRQOL. <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite worsening HRQOL outcomes compared to baseline, the first-line agents atezolizumab/bevacizumab and lenvatinib had superior HRQOL outcomes in comparison to sorafenib. Sorafenib significantly worsened HRQOL compared to TARE. As the majority of included studies included sorafenib, which has been largely superseded by newer therapies, further trials evaluating HRQOL with these newer therapies are required.</p>","PeriodicalId":46297,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Hepatology","volume":"2025 ","pages":"1083642"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11996279/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/ijh/1083642","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Poor outcomes in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) coupled with potential significant treatment side effects underpin a strong rationale to assess health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in those treated with systemic therapies. This study is aimed at quantifying the effect of systemic therapies on HRQOL outcomes in HCC patients when compared to baseline or placebo, other systemic therapies, and transarterial radioembolisation (TARE). Methods: In May 2024, two independent reviewers searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Google Scholar for studies comparing postsystemic therapy HRQOL scores in adult patients with HCC to baseline or placebo, other systemic therapies, or to TARE. Narrative synthesis was used to synthesise results. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2 and ROBINS-I. This review was structured according to PRISMA guidelines and was prospectively registered in the PROSPERO register (CRD42024521699). Results: Twenty-nine studies with 10,472 patients using eight HRQOL instruments were included. Compared to baseline, patients on atezolizumab/bevacizumab and sorafenib both experienced significant declines in HRQOL, and lenvatinib nonsignificantly decreased HRQOL. HRQOL remained unchanged in patients on pembrolizumab or nivolumab. Atezolizumab/bevacizumab and lenvatinib both significantly delayed HRQOL deterioration compared to sorafenib. Compared to TARE, atezolizumab/bevacizumab delayed time-to-deterioration in HRQOL, whereas sorafenib had significantly worse HRQOL. Conclusion: Despite worsening HRQOL outcomes compared to baseline, the first-line agents atezolizumab/bevacizumab and lenvatinib had superior HRQOL outcomes in comparison to sorafenib. Sorafenib significantly worsened HRQOL compared to TARE. As the majority of included studies included sorafenib, which has been largely superseded by newer therapies, further trials evaluating HRQOL with these newer therapies are required.

肝细胞癌与健康相关生活质量:系统性治疗结果的系统回顾
目的:晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)预后不佳,加上潜在的显著治疗副作用,为评估接受全身治疗的患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)提供了强有力的依据。本研究旨在量化与基线或安慰剂、其他全身治疗和经动脉放射栓塞(TARE)相比,全身治疗对HCC患者HRQOL结果的影响。方法:2024年5月,两名独立评审员检索了PubMed、EMBASE和谷歌Scholar,以比较成年HCC患者全身治疗后HRQOL评分与基线或安慰剂、其他全身治疗或TARE的研究。使用叙事综合来综合结果。使用rob2和ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险。本综述按照PRISMA指南构建,并预期在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024521699)中注册。结果:纳入29项研究,10472例患者,使用8种HRQOL仪器。与基线相比,阿特唑单抗/贝伐单抗和索拉非尼组患者的HRQOL均显著下降,lenvatinib组患者的HRQOL无显著下降。使用派姆单抗或纳武单抗的患者HRQOL保持不变。与索拉非尼相比,Atezolizumab/bevacizumab和lenvatinib均可显著延缓HRQOL恶化。与TARE相比,阿特唑单抗/贝伐单抗延缓了HRQOL的恶化时间,而索拉非尼的HRQOL明显更差。结论:尽管HRQOL结果与基线相比有所恶化,但与索拉非尼相比,一线药物阿特唑单抗/贝伐单抗和lenvatinib具有更好的HRQOL结果。与TARE相比,索拉非尼显著恶化了HRQOL。由于大多数纳入的研究包括索拉非尼,这在很大程度上已被新疗法所取代,因此需要进一步的试验来评估这些新疗法的HRQOL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Hepatology
International Journal of Hepatology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Hepatology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to the medical, surgical, pathological, biochemical, and physiological aspects of hepatology, as well as the management of disorders affecting the liver, gallbladder, biliary tree, and pancreas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信