Take Two: Second Systolic Blood Pressure Provides Prognostic Information in Trauma.

IF 1.2 Q3 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-11-05 DOI:10.4103/jets.jets_62_24
Esther J Kim, Marquis Winston, Alison L Muller, Anthony P Martin, Christopher A Butts, Eugene F Reilly, Thomas A Geng, Adam P Sigal, Adrian W Ong
{"title":"Take Two: Second Systolic Blood Pressure Provides Prognostic Information in Trauma.","authors":"Esther J Kim, Marquis Winston, Alison L Muller, Anthony P Martin, Christopher A Butts, Eugene F Reilly, Thomas A Geng, Adam P Sigal, Adrian W Ong","doi":"10.4103/jets.jets_62_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>An initial systolic blood pressure (SBP1) of <110 mmHg has been shown to predict mortality. However, SBP1 may not reflect hemodynamic changes during initial resuscitation. We aimed to determine if the second recorded blood pressure (SBP2) could provide additional prognostic value.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An 8-year retrospective chart review was performed including patients who underwent trauma activations at a single institution. The initial systolic blood pressure (SBP 1) and second systolic blood pressure (SBP 2) were analyzed. Difference between the first and second systolic blood pressure (ΔSBP) was defined as SBP2 - SBP1. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was receipt of ≥2 units of blood in the first 4 h of admission. Univariable analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the relationship of SBP2 and ΔSBP with the study outcomes. Regression model fit was assessed by the likelihood ratio test and Akaike information criterion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eight thousand seven hundred and ninety-eight patients were included with 12% and 13% presenting with SBP1 <110 mmHg and SBP2 <110 mmHg, respectively. Four hundred and six (5%) died and 327 (4%) received ≥2 units of blood in the first 4 h. The addition of ΔSBP to regression models improved model fit in explaining the primary and secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis found that the addition of ΔSBP improved model fit for those with penetrating mechanism of injury and those with Injury Severity Score of ≥9, but not for those with blunt moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SBP2 offers additional prognostic value in predicting trauma outcomes. Incorporating subsequent hemodynamic data during resuscitation beyond the initial SBP in trauma databases should be considered.</p>","PeriodicalId":15692,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","volume":"18 1","pages":"10-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020936/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jets.jets_62_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: An initial systolic blood pressure (SBP1) of <110 mmHg has been shown to predict mortality. However, SBP1 may not reflect hemodynamic changes during initial resuscitation. We aimed to determine if the second recorded blood pressure (SBP2) could provide additional prognostic value.

Methods: An 8-year retrospective chart review was performed including patients who underwent trauma activations at a single institution. The initial systolic blood pressure (SBP 1) and second systolic blood pressure (SBP 2) were analyzed. Difference between the first and second systolic blood pressure (ΔSBP) was defined as SBP2 - SBP1. The primary outcome was inhospital mortality, and the secondary outcome was receipt of ≥2 units of blood in the first 4 h of admission. Univariable analysis and logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the relationship of SBP2 and ΔSBP with the study outcomes. Regression model fit was assessed by the likelihood ratio test and Akaike information criterion.

Results: Eight thousand seven hundred and ninety-eight patients were included with 12% and 13% presenting with SBP1 <110 mmHg and SBP2 <110 mmHg, respectively. Four hundred and six (5%) died and 327 (4%) received ≥2 units of blood in the first 4 h. The addition of ΔSBP to regression models improved model fit in explaining the primary and secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis found that the addition of ΔSBP improved model fit for those with penetrating mechanism of injury and those with Injury Severity Score of ≥9, but not for those with blunt moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.

Conclusion: SBP2 offers additional prognostic value in predicting trauma outcomes. Incorporating subsequent hemodynamic data during resuscitation beyond the initial SBP in trauma databases should be considered.

第二篇:二次收缩压提供创伤预后信息。
方法:对在同一家医院接受创伤激活治疗的患者进行了8年回顾性图表回顾。分析初始收缩压(SBP 1)和第二次收缩压(SBP 2)。第一和第二收缩压差(ΔSBP)定义为SBP2 - SBP1。主要终点是住院死亡率,次要终点是入院前4小时接受≥2单位血液。采用单变量分析和logistic回归分析评估SBP2和ΔSBP与研究结果的关系。采用似然比检验和赤池信息准则评价回归模型的拟合。结果:共纳入88798例患者,分别有12%和13%的患者表现为SBP1。结论:SBP2在预测创伤预后方面具有额外的预后价值。应考虑在创伤数据库中合并复苏期间初始收缩压以外的后续血流动力学数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
52
审稿时长
39 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信