Dexmedetomidine as a Promising Neuroprotective Sedoanalgesic in Neonatal Therapeutic Hypothermia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Neonatology Pub Date : 2025-05-02 DOI:10.1159/000546017
Enrico Cocchi, Juleda Shabani, Arianna Aceti, Gina Ancora, Luigi Corvaglia, Federico Marchetti
{"title":"Dexmedetomidine as a Promising Neuroprotective Sedoanalgesic in Neonatal Therapeutic Hypothermia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Enrico Cocchi, Juleda Shabani, Arianna Aceti, Gina Ancora, Luigi Corvaglia, Federico Marchetti","doi":"10.1159/000546017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a leading cause of neonatal mortality and neurodevelopmental disabilities. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the standard of care, but optimized sedoanalgesic strategies remain critical. Dexmedetomidine shows promise as an alternative to traditional sedatives, but its role in this context remains systematically underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in neonates undergoing TH for HIE.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, WOS, ClinicalTrials, and Cochrane Library identified studies published from January 2014 to October 2024. Studies focusing on dexmedetomidine in neonatal TH with relevant outcomes were included. Selection followed PRISMA guidelines, with independent quality assessments. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024605817). Results are presented as meta-analyses or evidence-based discussions when pooling was unfeasible.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven studies involving 609 neonates were included: four cohort studies (n = 486) and three case series (n = 123). Dexmedetomidine provided comparable sedation to traditional agents (MD = -0.01 [-0.68 - 0.66], p = 0.99) and significantly reduced seizure risk (OR 0.31 [0.10 - 0.98], p < 0.05) with a non-inferior safety profile. Trends suggested shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and time to full enteral feeding. Substantial heterogeneity in dosing protocols highlights the need for standardization.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dexmedetomidine appears to be a safe and promising sedative in neonatal TH for HIE, with potential neuroprotective, respiratory, and gastrointestinal benefits. Despite limited evidence and the absence of randomized clinical trials, its non-inferior efficacy and safety warrant further exploration and urges the development of standardized dosing protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":94152,"journal":{"name":"Neonatology","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neonatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000546017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is a leading cause of neonatal mortality and neurodevelopmental disabilities. Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) is the standard of care, but optimized sedoanalgesic strategies remain critical. Dexmedetomidine shows promise as an alternative to traditional sedatives, but its role in this context remains systematically underexplored.

Objective: This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine in neonates undergoing TH for HIE.

Methods: A systematic search of Medline, Scopus, EMBASE, WOS, ClinicalTrials, and Cochrane Library identified studies published from January 2014 to October 2024. Studies focusing on dexmedetomidine in neonatal TH with relevant outcomes were included. Selection followed PRISMA guidelines, with independent quality assessments. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024605817). Results are presented as meta-analyses or evidence-based discussions when pooling was unfeasible.

Results: Seven studies involving 609 neonates were included: four cohort studies (n = 486) and three case series (n = 123). Dexmedetomidine provided comparable sedation to traditional agents (MD = -0.01 [-0.68 - 0.66], p = 0.99) and significantly reduced seizure risk (OR 0.31 [0.10 - 0.98], p < 0.05) with a non-inferior safety profile. Trends suggested shorter duration of mechanical ventilation and time to full enteral feeding. Substantial heterogeneity in dosing protocols highlights the need for standardization.

Conclusions: Dexmedetomidine appears to be a safe and promising sedative in neonatal TH for HIE, with potential neuroprotective, respiratory, and gastrointestinal benefits. Despite limited evidence and the absence of randomized clinical trials, its non-inferior efficacy and safety warrant further exploration and urges the development of standardized dosing protocols.

右美托咪定作为一种有前途的神经保护sedo镇痛药用于新生儿治疗性低温:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)是新生儿死亡和神经发育障碍的主要原因。治疗性低温(TH)是标准的护理,但优化的热镇痛策略仍然至关重要。右美托咪定有望作为传统镇静剂的替代品,但其在这方面的作用仍未得到系统的探索。目的:本荟萃分析评价右美托咪定在新生儿接受TH治疗HIE的安全性和有效性。方法:系统检索Medline、Scopus、EMBASE、WOS、ClinicalTrials和Cochrane Library,确定2014年1月至2024年10月发表的研究。纳入了有关右美托咪定在新生儿TH中的相关结果的研究。选择遵循PRISMA指导方针,并进行独立的质量评估。该协议在PROSPERO (CRD42024605817)中注册。当汇集不可行时,结果以荟萃分析或循证讨论的形式呈现。结果:共纳入7项研究,涉及609名新生儿:4项队列研究(n = 486)和3项病例系列研究(n = 123)。右美托咪定的镇静效果与传统药物相当(MD = -0.01 [-0.68 - 0.66], p = 0.99),显著降低癫痫发作风险(OR = 0.31 [0.10 - 0.98], p < 0.05),且安全性不差。趋势提示机械通气持续时间和完全肠内喂养时间缩短。给药方案的巨大异质性突出了标准化的必要性。结论:右美托咪定似乎是一种安全且有前景的镇静药,用于新生儿TH治疗HIE,具有潜在的神经保护、呼吸和胃肠道益处。尽管证据有限,缺乏随机临床试验,但其非劣势的疗效和安全性值得进一步探索,并敦促制定标准化的给药方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信