Worldwide Regulatory Reliance: Results of an Executed Chemistry, Manufacturing and Control Post Approval Change Pilot.

Q3 Medicine
Cynthia Ban, Jamie Graham, Lyne Le Palaire, Priya Persaud, Franziska Brehme, Olivier Faure, Allison Rameau, Ana Luisa Silva
{"title":"Worldwide Regulatory Reliance: Results of an Executed Chemistry, Manufacturing and Control Post Approval Change Pilot.","authors":"Cynthia Ban, Jamie Graham, Lyne Le Palaire, Priya Persaud, Franziska Brehme, Olivier Faure, Allison Rameau, Ana Luisa Silva","doi":"10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003023.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-approval changes (PACs) are integral to pharmaceutical product lifecycle management ensuring that the product remains safe, effective, and compliant with evolving standards. However, managing these changes across multiple regulatory jurisdictions remains a challenging endeavor due to diverse regulatory requirements and timelines across national regulatory authorities (NRAs). This results in delays obtaining approval from NRAs, impacting global supply chains, and ultimately jeopardizing timely access of essential medical products to patients. In 2021, the WHO issued the Good Reliance Practices (GReIP) guidance to encourage streamlined PAC review and approval process while maintaining access to quality-assured, safe, and effective medicinal products. NRAs are encouraged to rely on the assessment completed by a reference authority that agrees to provide the outcomes of its regulatory expertise. The ultimate objective of this guidance is to accelerate the overall process for PACs, ultimately fostering more equitable and timely access of medical products to populations who need them. This approach was tested in a CMC PAC pilot to determine the feasibility of using the principles of regulatory reliance based on the recommendations outlined in the GReIP with the goal of establishing a predictable, 6-month approval timeframe across multiple NRAs. The design and management of this pilot is described in Gastineau et al.This paper describes the outcomes of the pilot which demonstrates that regulatory reliance is feasible. Of the 21 Regulatory NRAs that agreed to participate, 55% were able to complete the review within 6 months; within 10 months, 95% of approvals were received and, after 16 months, all participating countries had approved the PAC. The use of a Q&A SharePoint Tool allowed for visibility of the questions raised and company responses amongst NRAs. Feedback on this reliance pilot was solicited from the participating NRAs and provides further support for future CMC PAC reliance cases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19986,"journal":{"name":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PDA Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5731/pdajpst.2024-003023.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-approval changes (PACs) are integral to pharmaceutical product lifecycle management ensuring that the product remains safe, effective, and compliant with evolving standards. However, managing these changes across multiple regulatory jurisdictions remains a challenging endeavor due to diverse regulatory requirements and timelines across national regulatory authorities (NRAs). This results in delays obtaining approval from NRAs, impacting global supply chains, and ultimately jeopardizing timely access of essential medical products to patients. In 2021, the WHO issued the Good Reliance Practices (GReIP) guidance to encourage streamlined PAC review and approval process while maintaining access to quality-assured, safe, and effective medicinal products. NRAs are encouraged to rely on the assessment completed by a reference authority that agrees to provide the outcomes of its regulatory expertise. The ultimate objective of this guidance is to accelerate the overall process for PACs, ultimately fostering more equitable and timely access of medical products to populations who need them. This approach was tested in a CMC PAC pilot to determine the feasibility of using the principles of regulatory reliance based on the recommendations outlined in the GReIP with the goal of establishing a predictable, 6-month approval timeframe across multiple NRAs. The design and management of this pilot is described in Gastineau et al.This paper describes the outcomes of the pilot which demonstrates that regulatory reliance is feasible. Of the 21 Regulatory NRAs that agreed to participate, 55% were able to complete the review within 6 months; within 10 months, 95% of approvals were received and, after 16 months, all participating countries had approved the PAC. The use of a Q&A SharePoint Tool allowed for visibility of the questions raised and company responses amongst NRAs. Feedback on this reliance pilot was solicited from the participating NRAs and provides further support for future CMC PAC reliance cases.

全球监管依赖:执行化学,制造和控制后批准变更试点的结果。
批准后变更(PACs)是药品生命周期管理不可或缺的一部分,可确保产品保持安全、有效并符合不断发展的标准。然而,由于国家监管机构(nra)的监管要求和时间表不同,在多个监管管辖区管理这些变化仍然是一项具有挑战性的工作。这导致延迟获得国家监管机构的批准,影响全球供应链,并最终危及患者及时获得基本医疗产品。2021年,世卫组织发布了良好信赖规范(GReIP)指南,以鼓励简化PAC审查和批准流程,同时保持对质量有保证、安全和有效的药品的获取。鼓励nra依赖由同意提供其监管专业知识结果的参考机构完成的评估。本指南的最终目标是加速药品供应中心的总体进程,最终促进有需要的人群更公平和及时地获得医疗产品。该方法在CMC PAC试点中进行了测试,以确定根据GReIP中概述的建议使用监管依赖原则的可行性,目标是在多个nra之间建立可预测的6个月审批时间框架。Gastineau等人描述了该试点的设计和管理。本文描述了该试点的结果,表明监管依赖是可行的。在同意参与的21家监管机构中,55%能够在6个月内完成审查;在10个月内,获得了95%的批准,16个月后,所有参与国家都批准了PAC。使用问答SharePoint工具,可以看到nra提出的问题和公司的回应。我们向参与的国家监管机构征求了关于该信赖试验的反馈意见,并为未来CMC PAC信赖案例提供了进一步的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信