Patient Validation of Estimation of Health Utility Values in Alopecia Areata.

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS
Caleb Dixon, Thomas Price, Elin Gruffydd, Andrew Lloyd, Ernest H Law
{"title":"Patient Validation of Estimation of Health Utility Values in Alopecia Areata.","authors":"Caleb Dixon, Thomas Price, Elin Gruffydd, Andrew Lloyd, Ernest H Law","doi":"10.1007/s41669-025-00576-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Current patient-reported burden measures, which guide decision-making, may not be sensitive to pertinent impacts of alopecia areata (AA). The UK public previously valued patient/caregiver vignettes using the time trade-off (TTO) method in interviews; however, the public may not fully understand the impact of AA. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the content validity of the vignettes using TTO interviews with patients with AA and to compare patient-derived utilities for each health state with the utilities derived from the UK public.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To understand their perspective surrounding trade-offs between quantity and quality of life, and to confirm the UK public's utility values, adult participants in the UK with AA currently experiencing scalp hair loss or with no scalp hair loss but experiencing hair loss in the last 12 months were recruited. In total, five AA vignettes that described health states by hair loss and its impacts and one caregiver vignette describing caring for an adolescent patient (aged 12-17 years) with AA were presented to participants in interviewer-guided sessions. Participants imagined themselves in the health state or as a caregiver, then valued each state using a visual analog scale (VAS) and traded time from 10 years in full health in 6-month increments to avoid living in each health state to evaluate the TTO utilities (0 [dead] to 1 [full health]).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among participants (N = 50), mean VAS scores (Severity of Alopecia Tool [SALT] 0-10: 74.3; SALT 11-20: 59.0; SALT 21-49: 39.4; SALT 50-100: 29.6; SALT 50-100 [no eyebrows/eyelashes]: 26.0; and caregiver [adolescent SALT 50-100]: 58.6) and TTO utility values (SALT 0-10: 0.93; SALT 11-20: 0.87; SALT 21-49: 0.67; SALT 50-100: 0.54; SALT 50-100 [no eyebrows/eyelashes]: 0.45; and caregiver [adolescent SALT 50-100]: 0.81) were lower for states with greater hair loss, similar to the mean UK public utility values. Over a 10-year time horizon, the average patient with AA was willing to trade approximately 5 years of life (mean TTO utility, 0.537 [standard deviation, 0.448]) to avoid impacts associated with 50-100% scalp hair loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first known study to evaluate how patients with AA would make trade-offs between quantity of life and disease-specific quality of life. A high willingness to trade off duration of life was observed, consistent with the UK public study and supporting a high disease burden of AA.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-025-00576-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Current patient-reported burden measures, which guide decision-making, may not be sensitive to pertinent impacts of alopecia areata (AA). The UK public previously valued patient/caregiver vignettes using the time trade-off (TTO) method in interviews; however, the public may not fully understand the impact of AA. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the content validity of the vignettes using TTO interviews with patients with AA and to compare patient-derived utilities for each health state with the utilities derived from the UK public.

Methods: To understand their perspective surrounding trade-offs between quantity and quality of life, and to confirm the UK public's utility values, adult participants in the UK with AA currently experiencing scalp hair loss or with no scalp hair loss but experiencing hair loss in the last 12 months were recruited. In total, five AA vignettes that described health states by hair loss and its impacts and one caregiver vignette describing caring for an adolescent patient (aged 12-17 years) with AA were presented to participants in interviewer-guided sessions. Participants imagined themselves in the health state or as a caregiver, then valued each state using a visual analog scale (VAS) and traded time from 10 years in full health in 6-month increments to avoid living in each health state to evaluate the TTO utilities (0 [dead] to 1 [full health]).

Results: Among participants (N = 50), mean VAS scores (Severity of Alopecia Tool [SALT] 0-10: 74.3; SALT 11-20: 59.0; SALT 21-49: 39.4; SALT 50-100: 29.6; SALT 50-100 [no eyebrows/eyelashes]: 26.0; and caregiver [adolescent SALT 50-100]: 58.6) and TTO utility values (SALT 0-10: 0.93; SALT 11-20: 0.87; SALT 21-49: 0.67; SALT 50-100: 0.54; SALT 50-100 [no eyebrows/eyelashes]: 0.45; and caregiver [adolescent SALT 50-100]: 0.81) were lower for states with greater hair loss, similar to the mean UK public utility values. Over a 10-year time horizon, the average patient with AA was willing to trade approximately 5 years of life (mean TTO utility, 0.537 [standard deviation, 0.448]) to avoid impacts associated with 50-100% scalp hair loss.

Conclusions: This is the first known study to evaluate how patients with AA would make trade-offs between quantity of life and disease-specific quality of life. A high willingness to trade off duration of life was observed, consistent with the UK public study and supporting a high disease burden of AA.

斑秃患者健康效用价值评估的患者验证。
背景:目前指导决策的患者报告的负担指标可能对斑秃(AA)的相关影响不敏感。英国公众以前在访谈中使用时间权衡(TTO)方法来评估患者/护理人员的小插曲;然而,公众可能并不完全了解机管局的影响。因此,本研究旨在通过对AA患者的TTO访谈来评估小短文的内容效度,并将每个健康状态的患者衍生效用与英国公众衍生效用进行比较。方法:为了了解他们对生活数量和质量之间权衡的看法,并确认英国公众的效用价值,我们招募了英国成年AA参与者,他们目前正在经历头皮脱发或没有头皮脱发,但在过去的12个月里经历了脱发。总共有五个AA小短文描述了脱发的健康状况及其影响,一个小短文描述了照顾一个患有AA的青少年患者(12-17岁)。参与者想象自己处于健康状态或作为照顾者,然后使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)对每种状态进行评估,并以6个月为单位,从10年的完全健康状态交换时间,以避免生活在每种健康状态中,以评估TTO效用(0[死亡]到1[完全健康])。结果:在参与者中(N = 50),平均VAS评分(脱发严重程度工具[SALT] 0-10: 74.3;盐11-20:59.0;盐21-49:39.4;盐50-100:29.6;SALT 50-100[无眉毛/睫毛]:26.0;照顾者[青少年SALT 50-100]: 58.6)和TTO效用值(SALT 0-10: 0.93;盐11-20:0.87;盐21-49:0.67;盐50-100:0.54;SALT 50-100[无眉毛/睫毛]:0.45;和照顾者[青少年SALT 50-100]: 0.81)在脱发较多的州更低,与英国公用事业的平均值相似。在10年的时间范围内,AA患者平均愿意牺牲大约5年的生命(平均TTO效用,0.537[标准差,0.448]),以避免与50% -100%头皮脱发相关的影响。结论:这是已知的第一个评估AA患者如何在生存时间和疾病特异性生活质量之间进行权衡的研究。我们观察到,人们非常愿意权衡寿命长短,这与英国的公共研究一致,并支持AA的高疾病负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信